The Gift Of The Sabbath - Is It For Us? - NEW AND IMPROVED??

[GerhardEbersoehn]

the spirit in the new covenant

When did he come to life?

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

The old covenant was given, and 3000 Israelites died. The new covenant began in Acts 2, and 3000 Souls were added to the church, and born again.

Because the law kills, but the spirit gives life.

You really can talk sense as well. Buddie you are making things more and more difficult for yourself.

 

[Curtis]

When did he come to life?

The Holy Spirit IN US was not part of the old covenant, only a select few got that blessing then, but it is in the new covenant.

The letter kills but the SPIRIT gives life.

 

[Curtis]

You really can talk sense as well. Buddie you are making things more and more difficult for yourself.

Your assertion is baseless and unlearned.

 

[BarneyFife]

You obviously missed the whole point the Scriptures make.

Ecclesiastes 12:13 KJV: Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.

 

[Brakelite]

Can you test for the choir that Christians are not under that law, but have died to the law died to the law, and if you notice or pay attention, it says the check amount was in the wall brought death in the old covenant, but the law of the spirit in the new covenant brings life.

The old covenant was given, and 3000 Israelites died. The new covenant began in Acts 2, and 3000 Souls were added to the church, and born again.

Because the law kills, but the spirit gives life.

Co 3:6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.

You obviously missed the whole point the Scriptures make.

Wow. God established a covenant in order to kill 3000 people. And because it didn't work properly, ie faulty, He had a new one made up that worked just great.

 

[Enoch111]

And because it didn't work properly, ie faulty, He had a new one made up that worked just great.

Well isn't that exactly what is stated in the Bible?
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: (Heb 8:7,8)

 

[Brakelite]

Well isn't that exactly what is stated in the Bible?
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: (Heb 8:7,8)

Herein lies the perfect example of selective reading. Curtis blamed the covenant itself for 3000 deaths. You agree, claiming the Bible as your proof, but what does the bible actually say? Where did God place the fault and blame? Now. Read it again.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

2 Corinthians chapter three, where Paul says the apostles are the ministers of the new covenant and the law of the Spirit that gives life, which he contrasts with the ten commands, given to Moses on the mountain, that brings death..

Your bad learner potential cannot glare more conspicuously, <the apostles are the ministers of the new covenant>. O shut up please!

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

The Ten Commands are called the ministration of DEATH,

Utter ignorance of The Ministry of Christ. You're a waste of time

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

If the Ten Commands are still in effect, then the penalty for breaking them is still in effect

Indeed! somehow there must be some flash of light up there.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Well isn't that exactly what is stated in the Bible?
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them,

You're absolutely right depending on what you see as 'that first covenant' and what 'the second'. Clever and shrewd you naughty boy.

 

[Enoch111]

You agree, claiming the Bible as your proof, but what does the bible actually say?

Jamieson, Fausett, & Brown Commentary says it well:
8. finding fault with them—the people of the old covenant, who were not made "faultless" by it (Heb 8:7); and whose disregard of God's covenant made Him to "regard them not" (Heb 8:9). The law is not in itself blamed, but the people who had not observed it.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Jesus died because of the sin that was placed on Him, He rose because He didn't sin personally.

AH! The difference between SDA-ism and Gospel of Christ! Well defined!

But Jesus Died Because God Gave His Only Son and the Son Laid Down His Life Himself for He had the POWER and the WILL, to. CHRIST TRIUMPHED DYING THE DEATH OF DEATH. He didn't triumph because He didn't sin personally - that was matter of fact since eternity for eternity and from everlasting to everlasting.
GOD DID NOT HAVE TO TEST JESUS FIRST -- BLASPHEMOUS!

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

The Holy Spirit IN US was not part of the old covenant, only a select few got that blessing then, but it is in the new covenant.

<The Holy Spirit was not part of the old covenant> -- that's it! The old covenant's BIG FAULT exactly WAS: the <only select few that got the blessing then>. The right cord on pitch!

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Your assertion is baseless and unlearned.

HUM

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

I'm fine with that.

I thought you would.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

I don't feel compelled to keep a literal sabbath.

Who feels compelled to do that?!

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

You don't have to agree with what I say.

Thanks, you're generous.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

I've answered all of your contentions as far as I know. But if I haven't, bring them one at a time and I'll show you why I don't accept it.

PHEW!