You're mixing me up with theefaith again! I am not a RC and I don't have RCC beliefs.The discussion that brought this about was your RCC belief that a priest in a confessional can forgive sins ...
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You're mixing me up with theefaith again! I am not a RC and I don't have RCC beliefs.The discussion that brought this about was your RCC belief that a priest in a confessional can forgive sins ...
In your other post, you used Luke 10:16 which, when compared, is very similar to John. 20:23.
"He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me, and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me." (Luke 10:16)When a person confess his sins to a priest instead of asking forgiveness from anyone other that Christ, he is putting that priest above Christ; therefore creating an idol because it undermines and rejects the authority that was given to Christ to forgive us of our sins.
But it was shortly before Jesus' ascension that He spoke the following words about forgiveness in John 20:23 to his apostles.
"If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained." (John 20:23)
The Roman Catholic Church teaches that Christ was actually granting to the apostles the authority to forgive sins, and that the apostles passed on to their successors (supposedly the Roman priesthood) the same license to pardon sin.
This position is false. No interpretation is to be placed upon a difficult and obscure passage (such as this one) that would place it in direct conflict with numerous other clear texts.
The fact is, though all Christians are to forgive one another, by have a forgiving attitude (Eph. 4:32), ultimately, only God can bestow absolute pardon (cf. Psa. 130:4; Isa. 43:25; Dan. 9:9; Mic. 7:18; Acts 8:22). The Lord did not grant that right to the apostles or anyone else.
The grammar in John 20:23 is important in order to get the right interpretation of John 20:23. The Greek tenses of John 20:23 make it clear that the apostles were authorized only to announce the terms of forgiveness on the basis of God’s previous appointment.
Literally, the text suggests:
“Those whose sins you forgive, have already been forgiven; those whose sins you do not forgive, have not already been forgiven.”
The first verbs in the two clauses are aorist tense forms, while the second verbs are in the perfect tense. The perfect tense verbs imply an abiding state which commenced before the action of the aorists.
In other words, the apostles (and others since that time) were only authorized to declare forgiveness consistent with what the Lord had already determined.
Lastly, in Acts 2, which is the best example of John 20:23, the disciples were only authorized to announce the terms of salvation rather than personally granting it is confirmed by the fact that on that day of Pentecost, in harmony with the Spirit’s guidance, they did not personally forgive the sins of anyone. Rather, they merely proclaimed the conditions of pardon to which men and women complied eagerly.
To those believers who sincerely inquired: “What shall we do?”, Peter responded,
"Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.” (Acts 2:37-38).
Immediately after, Peter told them what they had to do for themselves scripture says that:
"...those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.” (Acts 2:41).
Therefore, upon the basis of responding to Peter's sermon, they received the forgiveness of their sins. This account surely is the pattern of what God inspired Peter to do for receiving forgiveness for their part in the crucifixion of Jesus and for their own personal salvation and stands for the basis of the foundation of Christs' church on earth until He comes at the end of this age.
John 20:23 does not sanction the modern Catholic clergy procedure of granting absolution from sin and to do so is heresy otherwise.
In your other post, you used Luke 10:16 which, when compared, is very similar to John. 20:23.
"He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me, and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me." (Luke 10:16)When a person confess his sins to a priest instead of asking forgiveness from anyone other that Christ, he is putting that priest above Christ; therefore creating an idol because it undermines and rejects the authority that was given to Christ to forgive us of our sins.
But it was shortly before Jesus' ascension that He spoke the following words about forgiveness in John 20:23 to his apostles.
"If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained." (John 20:23)
The Roman Catholic Church teaches that Christ was actually granting to the apostles the authority to forgive sins, and that the apostles passed on to their successors (supposedly the Roman priesthood) the same license to pardon sin.
This position is false. No interpretation is to be placed upon a difficult and obscure passage (such as this one) that would place it in direct conflict with numerous other clear texts.
The fact is, though all Christians are to forgive one another, by have a forgiving attitude (Eph. 4:32), ultimately, only God can bestow absolute pardon (cf. Psa. 130:4; Isa. 43:25; Dan. 9:9; Mic. 7:18; Acts 8:22). The Lord did not grant that right to the apostles or anyone else.
The grammar in John 20:23 is important in order to get the right interpretation of John 20:23. The Greek tenses of John 20:23 make it clear that the apostles were authorized only to announce the terms of forgiveness on the basis of God’s previous appointment.
Literally, the text suggests:
“Those whose sins you forgive, have already been forgiven; those whose sins you do not forgive, have not already been forgiven.”
The first verbs in the two clauses are aorist tense forms, while the second verbs are in the perfect tense. The perfect tense verbs imply an abiding state which commenced before the action of the aorists.
In other words, the apostles (and others since that time) were only authorized to declare forgiveness consistent with what the Lord had already determined.
Lastly, in Acts 2, which is the best example of John 20:23, the disciples were only authorized to announce the terms of salvation rather than personally granting it is confirmed by the fact that on that day of Pentecost, in harmony with the Spirit’s guidance, they did not personally forgive the sins of anyone. Rather, they merely proclaimed the conditions of pardon to which men and women complied eagerly.
To those believers who sincerely inquired: “What shall we do?”, Peter responded,
"Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.” (Acts 2:37-38).
Immediately after, Peter told them what they had to do for themselves scripture says that:
"...those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.” (Acts 2:41).
Therefore, upon the basis of responding to Peter's sermon, they received the forgiveness of their sins. This account surely is the pattern of what God inspired Peter to do for receiving forgiveness for their part in the crucifixion of Jesus and for their own personal salvation and stands for the basis of the foundation of Christs' church on earth until He comes at the end of this age.
John 20:23 does not sanction the modern Catholic clergy procedure of granting absolution from sin and to do so is heresy otherwise.
also they must hear our sins in order to know if they are going to forgive or retain them.
For someone to claim to forgive sins is blasphemy.
Mark 2:3-10
"3 And they come unto him, bringing one sick of the palsy, which was borne of four.
4 And when they could not come nigh unto him for the press, they uncovered the roof where he was: and when they had broken it up, they let down the bed wherein the sick of the palsy lay.
5 When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee.
6 But there was certain of the scribes sitting there, and reasoning in their hearts,
7 Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?
8 And immediately when Jesus perceived in his spirit that they so reasoned within themselves, he said unto them, Why reason ye these things in your hearts?
9 Whether is it easier to say to the sick of the palsy, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and take up thy bed, and walk?
10 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,)"
Only the Father and the Son can.
Isa. 43:25 "I, yes I, am He who blots out your transgressions for My own sake and remembers your sins no more."
And we are all priests. Who said this?? Peter!!Whoa!
1 Peter 2[:9] says, "You are a royal priesthood and a priestly kingdom," and Revelation [5:10], "Through your blood you have made us into priests and kings."
But who mediates for us?
1Tim 2:55 "For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,"
So, @theefaith you don't confess your sins to God or Jesus? Ever?
then why does Christ give this power to the apostles? Jn 20:23
why do they have the same mission ministry power and authority as Christ Jn 20:21
why do they have the ministry of reconciliation?
2 Corinthians 5:18
And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;
Ooooops! I do have to work on that!You're mixing me up with theefaith again!
What great questions!!
Ministry of reconciliation is to preach and teach the gospel and repair the relationship between God and man. All pastors, teachers, and us when we speak about Jesus to others participate in it.
Let's look at the forgiveness of sins another way. Some Catholics believe that the priest is the conduit which mediates the request for forgiveness through him to God. OK. The Bible says that there is only "ONE mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus" 1 Tim 2:55. So now we have a problem. Which is correct? If it is true that we only have one mediator, than confessing to a priest is not what we are supposed to do. We are told we can come boldly to the throne of grace. "“Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.” Hebrews 4:16
So what do we do? There is a problem here.
Why should you be confessing your sins to a sinner like a priest....or to Mary who was a sinner also???also they must hear our sins in order to know if they are going to forgive or retain them.
Why do Catholics always equate "the Church" with "the Catholic Church" when they are poles apart? You should also become a "fundamentalist" and give up all the Catholic claptrap. In fact, when you stand before Christ He will ask you why you preferred the lies to the truth when He is the Truth?but you fundamentalist must understand that Christ and his church are one! Acts 9:4 eph 5:32
Why should you be confessing your sins to a sinner like a priest....or to Mary who was a sinner also???
Here you see the Jewish leaders attempting to get the apostles to do as they wanted them to do. Take note of what they did instead.
Act 4:5...On the morrow their rulers and elders and scribes were gathered together in Jerusalem,
Act 4:18...So they called them and charged them not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus.
Act 4:19-20...But Peter and John answered them, "Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge; for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard."
What did the apostles refuse to do? They stood their ground and refused to follow the multitude of traditions that the religious leaders had imposed on the people and listened to God instead of the falsehood of the Jewish councils.
It is the RCC that hold fear over their membership by putting the "traditions of men" over their heads just as those Jewish leaders did. But those apostles knew who defy and instead chose to follow the words of Christ instead of the imposing burdened yoke of the Jewish leaders. You have to make a choice to decide who to follow also. Who takes priority in your life? A sinner priest, a sinner Mary? Or a sinless Christ?
Why should you be confessing your sins to a sinner like a priest....or to Mary who was a sinner also???
Here you see the Jewish leaders attempting to get the apostles to do as they wanted them to do. Take note of what they did instead.
Act 4:5...On the morrow their rulers and elders and scribes were gathered together in Jerusalem,
Act 4:18...So they called them and charged them not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus.
Act 4:19-20...But Peter and John answered them, "Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge; for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard."
What did the apostles refuse to do? They stood their ground and refused to follow the multitude of traditions that the religious leaders had imposed on the people and listened to God instead of the falsehood of the Jewish councils.
It is the RCC that hold fear over their membership by putting the "traditions of men" over their heads just as those Jewish leaders did. But those apostles knew who defy and instead chose to follow the words of Christ instead of the imposing burdened yoke of the Jewish leaders. You have to make a choice to decide who to follow also. Who takes priority in your life? A sinner priest, a sinner Mary? Or a sinless Christ?
Why should you be confessing your sins to a sinner like a priest....or to Mary who was a sinner also???
Here you see the Jewish leaders attempting to get the apostles to do as they wanted them to do. Take note of what they did instead.
Act 4:5...On the morrow their rulers and elders and scribes were gathered together in Jerusalem,
Act 4:18...So they called them and charged them not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus.
Act 4:19-20...But Peter and John answered them, "Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge; for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard."
What did the apostles refuse to do? They stood their ground and refused to follow the multitude of traditions that the religious leaders had imposed on the people and listened to God instead of the falsehood of the Jewish councils.
It is the RCC that hold fear over their membership by putting the "traditions of men" over their heads just as those Jewish leaders did. But those apostles knew who defy and instead chose to follow the words of Christ instead of the imposing burdened yoke of the Jewish leaders. You have to make a choice to decide who to follow also. Who takes priority in your life? A sinner priest, a sinner Mary? Or a sinless Christ?
Why do Catholics always equate "the Church" with "the Catholic Church" when they are poles apart? You should also become a "fundamentalist" and give up all the Catholic claptrap. In fact, when you stand before Christ He will ask you why you preferred the lies to the truth when He is the Truth?
Mary a sinner?
Gen 3:14 lk 1:28 rev 12:1
A good tree!
Matthew 7:18
A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
The fruit of the tree of Mary is our salvation! Matt 1:21 Lk 2:30 Jesus is our salvation! This reflects the immaculate conception of Mary and the miraculous conception of Jesus!
Lk 1:30 Mary found our salvation!
Lk 1:38 consented to our salvation!
A good tree (immaculate conception) Lk 1:49 God has done this and it is marvelous in our eyes!
Isa 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
Matt 1:23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
A sinner would be an evil tree with evil fruit, but the fruit of Mary is salvation!
Mary brings in the good fruits of our redemption and salvation!
Proving Mary most holy, ever virgin mother of God & mother of our salvation is not a sinner!
Lk 1:28 Hail, Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee, blessed art thou among women.
How can God fill a sinner with grace, and remain a sinner?
Hail Mary full of grace!
How can the Lord be with sinner?
The lord is with thee!
How can sinner be blessed!
Blessed art thou, and all generations shall call me blessed!
Lk 1: 43 And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
How can a sinner be the mother of God?
Lk 1: 45 And blessed is she that believed: for there shall be a performance of those things which were told her from the Lord.
How could sinner be faithful?
Lk 1: 46 And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord,
How could a sinner magnify the Lord?
Lk 1:48 For he hath regarded the low estate of his handmaiden: for, behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed.
How could sinner be humble?
Lk 1:49 For he that is mighty hath done to me great things; and holy is his name.
How could sinner be the immaculate conception and the have the Holy Spirit accomplish the Miraculous conception of Jesus in Her?
Matt 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people from their sins.
22 Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying,
23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
How could sinner be a perpetual Virgin bringing forth the savior of the world?
Jn 19:27 Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.
How could sinner be our spiritual mother?
Lk 2:30 I have seen my salvation!
How could a sinner be the mother of our salvation?
Lots of words; lots of false doctrine; lots of waste of time because no one is buying what you are trying to sell us. It is obvious that you are sooooo deep into Roman Catholicism that I'm not sure if you are either a priest or a nun; but you don't seem to have the ears to hear or the eyes to see the truths of scripture.Mary of the New creation: spiritual
Lots of words; lots of false doctrine; lots of waste of time because no one is buying what you are trying to sell us. It is obvious that you are sooooo deep into Roman Catholicism that I'm not sure if you are either a priest or a nun; but you don't seem to have the ears to hear or the eyes to see the truths of scripture.
Mary the New Creation? Really?
Proof of her being a sinner
Firstly, all men have sinned, including Mary, and fallen short of the glory of God [Rom 3:23], and through one man sin entered the world and death spread to all men [Rom 5:12]. King David writing in Psalms says that he was brought forth in iniquity and in sin when his mother conceived him - biblical proof of mankinds sinful nature from the time of conception. [Psa 51:5]. According to the law of Moses every mother that conceived, either a male or female, had to after an appointed time offer sacrifices to God: one as a burnt offering, and one as a sin offering [Lev.12]. Mary, after conceiving Jesus made these sacrifices in accordance and obedience to the Law God gave to Moses. This is clearly indicated to us in the book of Luke chap. 2 ver. 21-24, as Mary applies this very observance as is required of every Jewish woman who conceives her first born son. Read Leviticus 12 is first, understand what is being said, then read Luke 2:21-24. Once reading and understanding what is being said, it is clear that the offering Mary offers makes according to ... law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons. [Lk.2:24], ... the one for the burnt offering, and the other for a sin offering: ... [Lev. 12:8]. The sin offering Mary gives is sufficient evidence Mary's carnality.
In need of a Saviour
Other proof of Mary being a sinner is found when Mary declares the need of a saviour. One is only in need of a saviour when realizing they are helpless and hopeless; that God in Christ having paid the penalty for the sins of mankind, is the One in Whom we are able to find redemption. [Col.1:12-14]. Mary also said, "My soul doth magnify the Lord, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour" [Luke 1:46,47]. Again, Mary admits her estate as the handmaiden of God and not "Mother of God". Admiting her estate as a handmaiden because God used her instrumentally as a vessel to conceive the Lord Jesus Christ. By Mary s own words, she removes any idea of pre-emanance so as not to assume exaltation above God s calling upon her life. "For he hath regarded the low estate of his handmaiden: for, behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed" [Luke 1:48].
Had more than four children
The Scriptures catergorically state the family Jesus had, and that Mary did conceive after the birth of Jesus. She never remained a virgin, and can never be considered "immaculate" as the Roman Catholic Church has exalteded her to be. "Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas? And his sisters, are they not all with us? Whence then hath this man all these things?" (Mat 13:55,56).
Not Mediatrix
Mary as mediatrix is unfounded in Scripture. Scripture tells us who makes intercession for the saints before the Father.
There are two mediators in Scripture, who are:
Firstly, the Lord Jesus Christ.
By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.
And they truly were many priests, because they were not suffered to
continue by reason of death: But this man, because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable priesthood. Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them. [Heb 7:22-25].
Secondly, the Holy Spirit.
Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God. [Rom 8:26,27].
I HOPE AND PRAY THAT SOME OF THIS WILL OPEN YOUR EYES! I have family that are RCC's and they are not as indoctrinated as you seem to be.