I am not taking sides with anyone bro.
But just stating the story of what Hitler was on about and it happens to be a fact.
-- True. Hitler's efforts were (at the start) to get land back that his country had lost through a previous war of aggression on their part.
You seem fine with that, but oppose the reclaiming of land that was taken from a country illegally. Go figure.
Now Hitler and you are on the same wave length and your ranting and raving about the home land .
-- You use words like "stupdi" and "ignorant" and then you complain about someone ELSE ranting and raving.
LOL Priceless.
What you are on about with the Jew loosing their home land ( that it was unfair ) shows you are ignorant of the scriptures. they lost it because they rejected God! and he vomited them out and that's a fact! no one could be so stupid to not understand the vineyard story ?
The UN's blessing HA! come of it! we know who is on drugs now.
-- We have been discussing it from a strictly secular viewpoint and now you want to hurl insults and accuse me of not knowing the scriptural basis just because I haven't brought it up?
How pathetically childish of you LOL
Yes, I understand the scriptural basis for what happened. The same reason God let them be taken by the Babylonians.
BUT - if you were honest and you want to base this argument on Scripture - then you have to admit that ACCORDING TO GOD'S OWN WORDS, that land belongs to Israel and He promised to give it back to them.
And - if you were honest - you would admit it is a miracle (and fulfillment of prophecy) that Israel has returned as a nation.
And - if you were honest - you would also acknowledge that it is NOTHING SHORT OF AN ACTUAL MIRACLE that they survived the several coordinated simultaneous attacks from multiple countries possessing several times more men and equipment.
The question is - and it is a valid question - are you honest?
II don't know what some people get out of trying to twist someones words just to suit some silly position of theirs.
-- Great question. Why are you doing that?