covenantee
Well-Known Member
Copy paste the particulars.You made a remark to me and said my question was answered in that post
I was not discussing the present kingdom.
I pray now you see why I said your post did not answer the comment I made.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Copy paste the particulars.You made a remark to me and said my question was answered in that post
I was not discussing the present kingdom.
I pray now you see why I said your post did not answer the comment I made.
This is based on your interpretation of a bodily resurrection. Those in Abraham's bosom left their graves with physical bodies at the Cross. You condemned them to thousands of more years of death. Jesus did not, nor does He condemn any one to death after the Cross. Jesus states no one will even taste death after the Cross. Yet you state all since the Cross do taste death until a future resurrection. You put the redeemed back into Abraham's bosom, but now the place may be called Paul's bosom since he wrote more of the NT, and was a prominent father of the NT church. That is the sad implication of Amil's single future resurrection.I didn't say you did. I was saying that I don't know how other Premils could believe otherwise.
Where is the scripture, besides your understanding of Revelation 20, that you can reference that supports this claim?
How does your view line up with what Jesus taught here:
John 5:28 “Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice 29 and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned.
You have the dead being raised on at least 3 different occasions, right? How does that fit with what Jesus taught in John 5:28-29?
In terms of dead believers in particular, how does your view line up with what Paul taught here:
1 Corinthians 15:22 For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive. 23 But each in turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him. 24 Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power.
Paul indicated that believers will be resurrected when Jesus comes and does not mention them being resurrected at any other time. If believers will be resurrected at some other time(s) besides just when Jesus comes again, then why didn't Paul mention that within a passage where he gives the order of bodily resurrections (unto bodily immortality), with Christ's being the first?
Thats not the purpose of prophecy.
the purpose of prophesy is there so those who DO see it. will know that the god of the boble spoke it. and because of it turn to him
We can't change Gods word my friend
Yes he did
so the AOD happens
then 3.5 years later christ returns.
everyone will know when jesus will return and ends evil on this earth
He will not come as a thief
Copy paste the particulars.
the kingdom (church) has been here since the day of pentecost.
The kingdom (Messianic rule) has yet to arrive. (future kingdom)
Post 545 references the Kingdom which is here.
You remain silent on the river of life seen "Why"?this is ridiculous
Why warn someone UNLESS they can sin.
If sin is IMPOSSIBLE there is no need of a warning..
when God says something will happens in hears. He is not speaking symbolically. If he did. Then no one could use that prophecy to prove what he said is true. you could make it say anything.I do not want to nitpick, but if you use terms like 3.5 years you are talking as if this is scientific years, months, days, rather than a symbolic term.
What happened at the time of righting means nothing.Equally in Revelation it is spoken of the 144,000 as if this an exact number rather than a symbol of completion and finishing of the destiny of the tribes and Israel. At the time of writing revelation, the ten lost tribes were lost and people did not know if they were part of which tribe. So is this implying the tribes are staying pure from the time of writing to now and are a group who can literally be identified?
The destroys the purpose of prophecy.What I mean by this, if as an artist I am painting a picture, colour will be used to represent certain features but the boundaries and exact sizes do not matter to get the image. So revelation is a painting on a grand scale. It summarises things and brings out important points but which are literal and which metaphor is difficult to judge. A dragon, a harlot, a beast, a statue etc. all are representations of different things, cities, satan, a corrupt power etc.
If after reading all of scripture and seeing Jesus and His statements who declares He will return as a thief in the night, to say he will not come as a thief in the night suggests the emphasis of saying "Jesus will not come as a thief" is wrong, because it contradicts Jesus's sharing.
God bless you
good day sirYou remain silent on the river of life seen "Why"?
Now what are you going to do with the "Eternal" river of life flowing out of Jerusalem in Zechariah 14:8?
Zechariah 14:8KJV
8 And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and in winter shall it be.
Revelation 22:1KJV
1 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
We Agree, The River Of Life Will Flow After The Return Of Jesus, But It Will Be In "The Eternal Kingdom" And Not A Millennial Kingdom On This Earth As You Believe And Teachgood day sir
The living waters will flow from jerusalem. after jesus lands and the mountain is tore in too O am not denying that
Your denying God said people CAN SIN, and they ill be punished if they do.
again, I am done with your nonsense. after years of trying to discuss with you. I have grow weary.
I will say enough just for someone who may ready your stuff. I know you will never hear a word I say.
the passage itself speaks of 2 distinct ressurections
I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their witness to Jesus and for the word of God, who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received his mark on their foreheads or on their hands. And they lived and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.
they were killed and now live and reign thats a ressurection
5 But the rest of the dead did not live again until the thousand years were finished.
here is the second. I do not have to go to the rest of scripture. it is there in black and white. The only reason you would have to go elswhere is because your belief does not fit what is said.
we are talking about rev 20. Lets get this first.. I am not playing your game.
Its as bad as another person who says when John said if we say we have son sin, John was not talking about himself. We have to go to the rest of scripture to prove he did not talk about himself.
show me IN THE PASSAGE. where there is only 1 resurrection.
for those who are as frustrated as I am by this guys continued to reject what the prophet said.We Agree, The River Of Life Will Flow After The Return Of Jesus, But It Will Be In "The Eternal Kingdom" And Not A Millennial Kingdom On This Earth As You Believe And Teach
The River Of Life Flowing From New Jerusalem
Zechariah 14:8KJV
8 And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and in winter shall it be.
Revelation 22:1KJV
1 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
Ezekiel 47:1-12KJV
1 Afterward he brought me again unto the door of the house; and, behold, waters issued out from under the threshold of the house eastward: for the forefront of the house stood toward the east, and the waters came down from under from the right side of the house, at the south side of the altar.
2 Then brought he me out of the way of the gate northward, and led me about the way without unto the utter gate by the way that looketh eastward; and, behold, there ran out waters on the right side.
3 And when the man that had the line in his hand went forth eastward, he measured a thousand cubits, and he brought me through the waters; the waters were to the ankles.
4 Again he measured a thousand, and brought me through the waters; the waters were to the knees. Again he measured a thousand, and brought me through; the waters were to the loins.
5 Afterward he measured a thousand; and it was a river that I could not pass over: for the waters were risen, waters to swim in, a river that could not be passed over.
6 And he said unto me, Son of man, hast thou seen this? Then he brought me, and caused me to return to the brink of the river.
7 Now when I had returned, behold, at the bank of the river were very many trees on the one side and on the other.
8 Then said he unto me, These waters issue out toward the east country, and go down into the desert, and go into the sea: which being brought forth into the sea, the waters shall be healed.
9 And it shall come to pass, that every thing that liveth, which moveth, whithersoever the rivers shall come, shall live: and there shall be a very great multitude of fish, because these waters shall come thither: for they shall be healed; and every thing shall live whither the river cometh.
10 And it shall come to pass, that the fishers shall stand upon it from Engedi even unto Eneglaim; they shall be a place to spread forth nets; their fish shall be according to their kinds, as the fish of the great sea, exceeding many.
11 But the miry places thereof and the marishes thereof shall not be healed; they shall be given to salt.
12 And by the river upon the bank thereof, on this side and on that side, shall grow all trees for meat, whose leaf shall not fade, neither shall the fruit thereof be consumed: it shall bring forth new fruit according to his months, because their waters they issued out of the sanctuary: and the fruit thereof shall be for meat, and the leaf thereof for medicine.
You are actually reinforcing the Op. Premil is a non-corroborative doctrine as you admit. It is dependent on one placing a private interpretation on the most debated chapter in Scripture and in the most symbolic setting in Scripture.
And . . . when everything is "allegory" or "symbol", where is the common interpretation? Each comes to their own. I've heard maybe half a dozen interpretations of who the 144,000 are if not that many Jewish men. I've even had a few answer me of which "spiritual tribe" are they. A few different ideas of what the "seal of the living God" may actually be, whether it's on the forehead, or in the mind.when God says something will happens in hears. He is not speaking symbolically. If he did. Then no one could use that prophecy to prove what he said is true. you could make it say anything.
when God says something will happens in hears. He is not speaking symbolically. If he did. Then no one could use that prophecy to prove what he said is true. you could make it say anything.
What happened at the time of righting means nothing.
God said 144000 from each tribe will do something, take him at his word..
The destroys the purpose of prophecy.
Prophecy is God saying THIS WILL HAPPEN.
if it does not happen. we are told to ignore the prophet that said that that would happen..
I think this is a big issue with some, they just can't understand how certain things could be.What happened at the time of righting means nothing.
God said 144000 from each tribe will do something, take him at his word..
Is this your catholic answer? You can not answer my question in the passage, so you resort to the private interpretation argument?
there is nothing symbolic about this passage. God said it will happen.
If you want to take it as symbolic then feel free.
I believe when God says these things will happen. they will
you have two options.
Show me IN THE PASSAGE what you want me to see
2 Admit you can not in the passage support your view.
and I will move on to someone who actually wants to discuss the word, not someone who is spoonfed what to believe and told that the church has the truth, and anyone who disagrees has a provate interpretation.
sorry if that sounds harsh. You opened the door with your catholic nonsense
Your claims are "false" in a direct personal attack, in non-response to the scriptural facts belowfor those who are as frustrated as I am by this guys continued to reject what the prophet said.
He said that people can sin. and not only said they can, but said if they do. they will be punished.
Yet he wants us all to think this is meant for eternity future. not Gods rule here on earth.
yeas, I am SMH also!
You haven't answered me on this.When you resort to insults and name-calling you have quickly lost debate. Sadly, this is the typical Premil way of engagement online!
I Agree 100% Good Post Of Truth!When you resort to insults and name-calling you have quickly lost the debate. Sadly, this is the typical Premil way of engagement online!
- The binding of Satan is spiritual. Satan is not human and physical. He is a spirit. A spirit cannot be held by physical restraints. What is more, he is not in a physical prison or is he restrained by metal chains.
- The binding does not suggest our enemy must be motionless or does it describe inactivity. Prisoners have movement in a prison albeit in a limited capacity, under strict rules and within controlled confines.
- Revelation 20 does not suggest that the devil is unable to inflict harm on anyone while bound. Everyone knows that a prisoner can perpetrate all types of crimes within the prison precincts.
Satan is "Currently" bound from "One Specific Purpose", And One Only?
- The binding of Satan is spiritual. Satan is not human and physical. He is a spirit. A spirit cannot be held by physical restraints. What is more, he is not in a physical prison or is he restrained by metal chains.
- The binding does not suggest our enemy must be motionless or does it describe inactivity. Prisoners have movement in a prison albeit in a limited capacity, under strict rules and within controlled confines.
- Revelation 20 does not suggest that the devil is unable to inflict harm on anyone while bound. Everyone knows that a prisoner can perpetrate all types of crimes within the prison precincts.
But, this interpretation contradicts a lot of other scripture passages which teach that Christ reigns now, all of the dead will be resurrected around the same time, all people will be judged at the same time and that all unbelievers will be killed on the day Christ returns. Is that of no concern to you?
The number of times the thousand years is mentioned is irrelevant and does not determine if it's literal or not. The beast is mentioned over 30 times in the book of Revelation. Does that make it a literal beast?
We should pay attention that this is written within a book containing a great deal of symbolic text.