The UK started WW2 and it's even been stated by the Jews that the UK even created it, but some people got killed in all ?
Does anyone know about this.
The German people thought at the start of the war it would be all over in say 6 months due to the stupid Idiots running Poland being seen for what they were, low life idiots.
Hitler did not start WW2 and that's a fact. the UK started it. and it did not have to become WW2 as the Polish German conflict could of been sorted out peacefully.
This is what an old Jewish German told me about 40 years ago and he was locked up by Hitler because he was 2ed removed from being a Jew in worship.
There may be a little... tid bit... of truth to that, with some of the facts rearranged.
See Georgetown history professor Carrol Quigley's 1960's work
Tragedy And Hope. He outlines some of the secret history of "the establishment" which he claimed to be a part of, and thereby was allowed to preview their secret records for two years.
How Hitler came to political power per secular history Quigley doesn't outright deny. But there was secret communications between him and Britain involving Germany's claim for "elbow room" (i.e., more land). Some of the lands east of Germany held a greater population of German speaking peoples, and Hitler wanted to annex those areas. Some leaders in Britain strategically sought to use Hitler's expansionist aims and Germany as a type of "buffer" zone between the Soviets and western Europe. They told Hitler to wait a little and he'd get what he wanted (this per Quigley).
When Prime Minister Chamberlain returned with a signed agreement of peace from Hitler, Britain thought they had achieved the waiting period for allowing Germany to annex certain lands (part of Yugoslavia if I recall. Some information from another source exists to show how certain Wall Street conglomerates had sent funds to Germany, which is how they got funds to build up their military machine (see Anthony Sutton's
Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler). This suggests (in my opinion) the money powers in the West mostly being behind this; some in the U.S., some in Britain, Switzerland, etc. I don't believe Hitler could have built up Germany's pre-war military machine without foreign financial aid. If looked at on a practical economic level, Hitler's Germany did in a very few years what no other European nation could do, not without foreign economic aid. If I recall, Quigley in his work was careful to not even suggest this part, although he was more than apt to cover all possible and probable angles of a historical matter.
Hitler refused to wait. Instead, he saw Britain as weak. It was then that Britain saw the near-future need to start building up their military, which they did with many planes which saved their bacon in the later Battle of Britain. Hitler had followed the footsteps of his early political idol, Mussolini, and then did what Mussolini only dreamed of. The German people loved Hitler because of his helping the economy to get back on its feet (via the money powers), especially after the post-WWI Treaty of Versaille had busted the Germany economy.
That's as far as Quigley goes on Britain's involvement with pre-war Germany and Hitler. Britain wanted Germany as a buffer state in Europe, and then saw Germany eventually as a threat to Britain's and Europe's existence, revealing most likely the 'money powers' are to blame for Germany becoming a threat against peace again. It suggests two separate political arms existing in Britain, one acting 'with' the money powers (funding Hitler), and another outsider group suspicious of the money powers (wanting to make a deal with Germany as a buffer state).
