All of us that post here speak some truth, some falsehood. But we bear testimony of our Gods. It is ashamed that someone who determines what Biblical truth is prevents others from stating their opinion, who is in favor of that?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
They are Christian, just not orthodox Christian.Im in favor of a Jehovah's Witness or Mormon cultist not deciding what should be "heard" on a "CHRISTIAN" forum.
What is the point of a forum if you cannot speak?
Why do you feel you should have the only opportunity to represent your god sir?Im in favor of a Jehovah's Witness or Mormon cultist not deciding what should be "heard" on a "CHRISTIAN" forum.
This was a great site Wrangler, people got along, was able to share their opinions, and now things are changing. Obviously new blood has came on the scene, showing favoritism to certain individuals, changing the look of the site, determining what is scriptural or not. It is a sad day for all of us. I fully realize that those who hate the true God, cannot prevent His people from reaching those who are rightly disposed, but they sure can make it harder for us.They are Christian, just not orthodox Christian.
Not much point. I'm sure a decline in post count has already been observed.
Why do you feel you should have the only opportunity to represent your god sir?
Please show me where and at what time one of these groups prevented any other professed Christians from deciding what should be heard or not heard on this forum, as I have not witnessed it anywhere on this form. However of recent I have noticed that some have attempted to censor the views of those of different faiths, and have even gone so far as to persuade the administrator of this forum not only to prohibit certain subjects from being discussed, but likewise to remove those who harbor any of these views.Im in favor of a Jehovah's Witness or Mormon cultist not deciding what should be "heard" on a "CHRISTIAN" forum.
"Just not orthodox".
What is that?
Mormon's believe
"ditto" the Catholic Cult.
And Mormon's believe
It’s OK with me that denominations have some beliefs of secondary importance that differ.Next..
The JW's do not believe
Isn’t that a reason for individual response to rule enforcement of etiquette rather than doctrinal censorship?Some of the changes have been down to how members communicate and attack one another -
It’s OK with me that denominations have some beliefs of secondary importance that differ.
Additionally, a lot of the times we SO misunderstand what other groups believe, on primary and secondary doctrines. The power of a venue like this is that we can listen and come to better understand each other. Understand doesn't mean agree, obviously, but being better informed is always a good thing.It’s OK with me that denominations have some beliefs of secondary importance that differ.
To be fair when I joined the forum I read a statement that the matter of the Trinity was a closed issue. However most of the discussions concerned the Trinity or the deity of Christ. Can you blame the administrators for taking action to enforce the rules? I understand there is still a section where discussions like that can take placeIsn’t that a reason for individual response to rule enforcement of etiquette rather than doctrinal censorship?
Fwiw, I only joined this forum because it doesn’t require you to agree to the Creeds (I have foundational issues with that) or their statements on the nature of God. And yes I do beleive Christ is the divine Son of God.To be fair when I joined the forum I read a statement that the matter of the Trinity was a closed issue. However most of the discussions concerned the Trinity or the deity of Christ. Can you blame the administrators for taking action to enforce the rules? I understand there is still a section where discussions like that can take place
Well, you are quick to speak for God with no foundation. I don’t recall the verse of such doctrinal purity that pivots salvation on NOT believing God has a ‘wife.’Its not ok with God that a CULT that you find "a-ok" Lies, and teaches that God has a "wife"
Another critical point is, after one realizes the denominational doctrines are not aligned, it is a test for one’s self control to choose not to engage further on that topic IF further discussion is too unsettling.Additionally, a lot of the times we SO misunderstand what other groups believe, on primary and secondary doctrines. The power of a venue like this is that we can listen and come to better understand each other.
That place is outside the Christian forums, a change from its proper and former place, the unorthodox forum.Can you blame the administrators for taking action to enforce the rules? I understand there is still a section where discussions like that can take place
Not much point. I'm sure a decline in post count has already been observed.
Not sure why this is a ‘however.’ If one does not want to discuss such topics, it is not required.However most of the discussions concerned the Trinity or the deity of Christ.