Spiritual Israelite
Well-Known Member
No, that is not what I'm claiming. I have clarified what I'm claiming more than once so it's not even possible that you are reading everything that I'm saying carefully. What I'm claiming is that ruling/shepherding with a rod of iron relates to destruction rather than what you might normally think that ruling/shepherding would mean. There is a difference between using a wooden staff to keep the sheep in line and using a rod of iron as a weapon to ward of predators and I've made this point more than once as well.You're claiming or implying that the only thing that God does with the rod of iron is what Psalm 2:9 says He is going to do - smite them with a rod of iron, and you're claiming that He does not rule/shepherd with a rod of iron.
Also, I've made the point that it indicates that the very ones who He smites/breaks/destroys with a rod of iron and treads in the winepress of the wrath of God are the same ones He "rules" with a rod of iron, so from my perspective the onus is on you to explain how it's possible for Him to rule/shepherd people in the way you are thinking of after He has broken/destroyed them.
Of course it is, but it helps to know what an iron rod was used for in a literal way in order to understand the metaphor.Note: The iron rod is a metaphor:
Where does it say that God/Jesus ever ruled/shepherded believers with an iron rod? Is that not what you're trying to claim? It seems so. So, show me where exactly it ever indicates that He did that. According to Psalm 2:8-9 it is "the heathen" that He uses His iron rod on, not believers. This is a key point that you should be willing to address. If you can't show Him ever using a rod of iron on believers, then you have nothing to support your belief about what it means for Him to rule with a rod of iron.1. God ruled/shepherded His people of the house of Israel with an iron rod, and the time came when He smote them with the same iron rod, and sent them into exile in the nations, the iron rod in His hand with which He smote them at the time, being the king of Assyria.
2. God ruled/shepherded His people Judah with an iron rod, and the time came when He smote them with the same iron rod, and sent them into exile in Babylon, the iron rod in His hand with which He smote them at the time, being the king of Babylon.
3. God ruled/shepherded His people Judah with an iron rod, and the time came when He smote them with the same iron rod, and sent them into exile in the nations, the iron rod in His hand with which He smote them at the time, being Titus and the Romans.
4. Jesus rules/shepherds His people with an iron rod, and the time is coming when He will smite them with the same iron rod at the hand of the beast, because of the waywardness of His people.
The prophecy that Revelation references (Psalm 2:8-9) indicates that He will destroy the heathen with His rod of iron. That can't be ignored. This shows that Him ruling and judging the nations ("nations" is a bad translation - should be "heathen") with a rod of iron has to do with Him destroying them.5. The Revelation states that He will rule/shepherd (the Greek word used in the Revelation translates as shepherd) the nations with an iron rod, and He will use the same iron rod to judge the nations when He returns, the iron rod in His hand being Himself.
LOL!!! I find it difficult to believe that you weren't already aware that I don't interpret all these things the same way you do. You acted like your interpretation of those things are facts, which is not the case. You have done nothing so far to show that God/Jesus ever has or ever will deal with believers with a rod of iron. We already know from Psalm 2:8-9 that Jesus will destroy unbelievers with it (figuratively speaking, of course).I found it difficult to believe that someone as knowledgeable of scripture as you are, will actually not know this.
I, of course, since I'm not an idiot, know the general difference between those terms, but ruling/shepherding and smiting with a rod of iron is another story. If you read Psalm 2:8-9 and Revelation 19:15-18 they both paint a picture of complete destruction. How can you just ignore that?I really did believe, until now, that you understood the difference between ruling/shepherding, and smiting.
I don't pretend. You should know that by now. I'm a straight shooter and I believe that is quite clear based on my posting style. I don't play games and I don't pretend. I have no reason to do that. I think everyone else here can clearly see that. No one else besides you has ever accused me of something like this.This is why I believed you were merely pretending not to know the difference.
No, it absolutely was not. I have never done anything to indicate that I'm just here to play games and pretend to say things that I don't really mean.Forgive me for having been wrong, but judging by what I've seen of your knowledge of scripture, it was an easy assumption to make
I refuse to agree with your faulty understanding of those terms in the context of how they are used. You seem to be completely ignoring the context of complete destruction regarding the use of the rod of iron and that isn't my fault. That seems to be due to doctrinal bias. I don't know what else could cause that.- but maybe, once again, the reason why you refuse to understand the difference between ruling/shepherding and smiting when it comes to what is written in the Revelation, is because of your determination to defend a theology (i.e, Amil) which just does not add up under the scrutiny of all scripture), and to instead interpret scripture always in such a way as to comply with that theology.