Yes, God was saying he was going to create all humans in His image. And He started small on the sixth day, two total, one male and the other female
Seems I am the only one true to God's Word. Every one else is way out there in Satan's deception.
Eve did not exist on the 6th Day. God does not start out small. Even you all Amil think the number 144k represents the entire church body from Adam on. Perhaps there were 1200 created on the 6th day. Or 144k?
God starts the Tribulation with 144k sealed individuals and that number grows throughout the tribulation.
Perhaps God started with just 2 lights in the sky then, and every time a human was born added a star into the sky? Why would God start out big with everything, and then you think God only created 1 single human?
On the day (singular) of creation, God watched many generations thrive on earth. How does multiple generations thrive in 24 hours?
"These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens,"
Is this merely symbolic to you? Did one singular man just represent many generations? Or does the term in Genesis 1:26-27 literally mean many. Mankind in general instead of a single person who could not even procreate unless both genders were in a single body. How many times did Adam multiply before God decided to seperate the woman from the man who was both male and female?
So many are stuck in evolution that they think that for millions of years there was just one male dividing into a host of other humans and thus we get a subdued earth?
It is not way out there to think that corporate humankind existed and filled the earth prior to God placing one of them into a Garden God just declared as solely for that single representive to live in and be God's caretaker of these two trees that God placed specifically in this Garden.
The NT never states that by one single man all humankind came into existence.
Paul says it was by one man, sin entered the world. How have we been so far removed from the reality of God's Word to think God started humankind with just 1 individual?
Luke 2:38
Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.
Is this symbolic or literal? Was Adam the sole son of God? Was Adam a son of God? Were there not many sons of God created on the 6th day. We just know the most infamous son of God. Then we are told that Jesus was the only begotten son of God. Because all the other sons of God were created, not begotten. Then people immediately assume Adam was the only created son of God. Being a son of God is merely being one of those designated as adamkind or humankind. We are all adam because that is the transliterated Hebrew word for mankind. So all adamites were sons of God in a corporate sense.
Out of all the sons of God, only Adam and Eve were in a state of physical death. They no longer had a permanent incorruptible physical body. They now had temporal corruptible bodies of dead flesh.
Eventually that dead flesh became appealing to the other sons of God generations removed from those created on the 6th day. How long after Seth was born was Noah born? That is the time the sons of God also had many generations of offspring. But you cannot view these sons of God as fallen humanity, when Adam disobeyed. They were the original humans though. Adam was originally a son of God, created in God's direct image. When Seth was born, he was born in Adam's dead corruptible flesh image. That is direct from God's Word.
"This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created. And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth:"
God now makes a distinction between Adam and those sons of God created on the 6th day. Adam was no longer in the image God created him in. Man called the sons of God were still in God's image. Now we see that Seth passed on Adam's image, not God’s image as a son of God. Seth was that first dead flesh image of Adam and Eve, thus only the first of all living whom Eve was the mother of in her now sinful state. Eve was the mother of all dead flesh, literally through Seth and and offspring born after Seth.
So the distinction is made in Genesis from that point on that humans were in Adam's dead flesh, and the sons of God were still in God's image. But the offspring between the sons of God and Adam's offspring are those who became exceedingly sinful to the point that in Noah's generation, not prior generations, but that particular generation and on, that only sinful Noah in a state of death, was more righteous than any other individual on earth of that generation and on for 500 years. In fact Noah did not even have offspring until he was 500 years old. All he saw in his generation was evil continually.
So yes, you taking a statement from a proud boastful sinner who just broke the only law, and plunged his offspring into an everlasting state of death, and you now claim that phrase was inspired of God, wherein you form a doctrine of man stating Eve was the only one responsible for all other humans being born, is foolishness. There were multitudes of sons of God, men of renown hundreds of years and many generations before Adam even gave that name to his wife, after the two of them were sinners. God told Moses what to write down, and this was an example of Adam's arrogance. Then your human doctrine declares that no one could have existed prior to Adam and Eve based on this arrogance. Thus all other Scripture is interpreted with this doctrinal bias, born of arrogance.