I have to take another bite of this apple.
I know another poster rejected the claim that Paul was angry. However, let's explore Paul's emotions, in particular, and men's emotions, in general ... For decades feminists have been claiming they want men to be more emotional. Here the truth is revealed. They don't want men to be more emotional.
Women want men to feel the way women want them to feel. This is not equality but manipulation, which is
disrespectful.
Implied is that the women are
automatic victims of a man feeling a way she does not approve of. Paul's angry?
Ever hear of self-righteous anger? It's as though there is no possible way the women could be in the wrong for their actions AND Paul has every right to be angry about it.
Regarding the right to feel the way one does; also for decades we've heard feminists lecture men that all emotions are valid and should be validated.
- Except when a man has emotions.
- Except when a man has emotions a woman does not approve of.
- Then shaming language is used to neutralize the truth about how a man feels.
- "Equality."