Just because you assume Premil is a false doctrine, why should I believe what you cannot biblically prove? Amil forces contradictions into Scripture, and that proves Amil is indeed unbiblical.
You shouldn't! You should study for yourself to see if Amil or even Premil is biblical or not. You've made an assumption saying Amil forces contradictions into Scripture. Since we are discussing Amil could you be kind enough to bring forth the way Amil forces contradictions into God's Word? Could you provide an example?
I'll show you one example where Premil forces contradiction. Premil doctrine teaches there will be one thousand more years of time given this earth after Christ returns. Scripture tells us this earth and everything in it will be utterly burned up when Christ returns, and there will be a new heaven and new earth. How do you reconcile Premil doctrine with the following passage from Scripture? Will there be another one thousand years on this burned up earth, or should we believe the Bible that tells us then there will be a new heaven and new earth wherein dwelleth righteousness???
2 Peter 3:10-13 (KJV) But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness, Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.