Biden staffers met with Special Counsel Jack Smith’s aides before Trump indictment Aug 26, 2023
- Thread starter Truth7t7
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Because those who want to destroy keep trying to change it into something it's not. As if men could be women and women men! Insanity!
Looking at the post above this one . . . it seems you are bringing it up! Fancy that!
Much love!
"Woman" is a word that describes the mature form of one of the two sexes, male and female. Can you guess which one?
Much love!
BarneyFife
Well-Known Member
Oh, and because nearly all of your participation takes place in threads where it's likely to come up. That might have something to do with it, too. You're not kidding anyone but yourself.
.
TinMan
Well-Known Member
TinMan
Well-Known Member
TinMan
Well-Known Member
Yep the question was being asked so i asked the one posing the question to answer it. They couldn't.
and apparently neither can you.
Neither.Toaster or car?
how bout this one...toaster or car?
Hm. Is the point here that if you take your car into your garage with your torches and saws and sheet metal, and you construct a "toaster-looking" shell to put around the car, that it magically transforms into a toaster? It that the idea? I don't think that happens.
If you chop the headlights off a car does it stop being a car? If you flock the body, does that mean it's now a toaster? Of course not! We all know that's just silly!
Much love!
TinMan
Well-Known Member
TinMan
Well-Known Member
From a picture in the modern day of body modifications? Do you seriously believe that if a man puts on a dress it makes him a woman?? Or if a woman has body modification surgury, and takes some hormones to get that beard going, they magically become a man? Wow! What a position to be arguing from!
Much love!
BarneyFife
Well-Known Member
I can speak for myself, thank you. English is my first and only fluent language. I didn't say nor imply anything about Trump, because I don't have much to say about him. So there's no need for you to interpret and restate what I said as having anything to do with him.
My point was that your activity is limited to socio-political discussion which is most likely to include lots of inflammatory socio-political issues, not the least of which is perversion in society and in the church.
This website has a handy search feature that makes it easy to see what individuals like to talk about.
@amigo de christo didn't ask for a definition. He merely pointed out that some folks are confused about it.
You seize upon such things—that's on you.
Anyway, here's what ChatGPT says:
A woman is an adult human female. In terms of biological sex, women typically have two X chromosomes...
...but it's important to note that gender identity and gender expression can be more complex and go beyond biological characteristics. Gender identity is a deeply-held sense of being male, female, a blend of both, or neither, and may not necessarily align with an individual's biological sex. Gender is a social and cultural construct that encompasses a range of roles, expectations, and behaviors associated with being a woman in a given society. It's important to respect an individual's self-identified gender and to use the appropriate pronouns and terms that they prefer. (In other words:
I've learned that AI answers like this can be fairly reliable all the way up until they get to the "but" part.
and apparently, you haven't.
(Largely because AI learned from the same people who "taught" you.)
And people are increasingly behaving the same way. Notice that the chatbot commences answering a question that hasn't even been asked after the "but" part.
Too bad there isn't an impressive, scientific term like "biological" to put before the word "sex" that would give "gender identity" the same weight as "biological sex" to a person who possesses a properly functioning frontal lobe. (Don't be offended—most folks don't—"conservatives" included.)
You've made it very clear even in this now dreadfully off-topic thread that the definition you're trying to drag out of people who were taught very clearly what a woman is before folks got so thoroughly deceived about it must unequivocally fall within the lowest-common-denominator parameters in which you've so sadly been pickled.
WE GET IT.
AND WE'RE NOT BUYING THE WILDLY IRONIC (yeah) NOTION THAT PEOPLE "ARE" PROBLEMS AS OPPOSED TO "HAVING" PROBLEMS, NOR THE PHONY "HATE" LABEL YOU INSIST ON APPLYING TO THE REJECTORS OF YOUR FAILED SALE.
The Bible decides what both problems and women are—not science falsely so-called (1 Timothy 6:20).
.
@BarneyFife
Don't laugh too hard, I'm serious. I don't believe I have a properly functioning frontal lobe. The entire cerebral cortex I think. I don't think my amygdala is in great shape either. Or my hypocampus. And I'm pretty sure my hypothalamus is severely underperforming, just listen to the ringing in my ears when something goes awry! I'm telling you brother, my head is a mess!!
Its a wonderful thing that the new creation spirit doesn't rely on this ol' brain!
Much love!
Let's try Biden on the laws he actually broke. Stolen Classified documents from the Schiff in the Senate. Illegal storage and having attorneys without top secret clearances rifle through everything.
Name the crime in the Presidential Records Act .......There is none.
Like your fantasy about About Amendment 14 ......Seems a lot of you socialists should go back to school and actually learn something useful. Amendment 14 states that Congress needs to enact a law .....Never did and never will.
Your President is an actual criminal .........
I think there's a problem with my entire brain. I'm not psycho, I'm schizo, but when I hear rotten and offensive jokes on facebook I'm like:
I haven't seen that in a long time! Maybe I'll get if from the library.I think there's a problem with my entire brain. I'm not psycho, I'm schizo, but when I hear rotten and offensive jokes on facebook I'm like:
I started to catalog my triggers, but I ran out of space on my hard drive.
Much love!
I already posted this in another thread, yet it's so applicable even today:
We've had others that spend their time on socio-political threads. And?I can speak for myself, thank you. English is my first and only fluent language. I didn't say nor imply anything about Trump, because I don't have much to say about him. So there's no need for you to interpret and restate what I said as having anything to do with him.
My point was that your activity is limited to socio-political discussion which is most likely to include lots of inflammatory socio-political issues, not the least of which is perversion in society and in the church.
This website has a handy search feature that makes it easy to see what individuals like to talk about.
@amigo de christo didn't ask for a definition. He merely pointed out that some folks are confused about it.
You seize upon such things—that's on you.
Anyway, here's what ChatGPT says:
A woman is an adult human female. In terms of biological sex, women typically have two X chromosomes...
...but it's important to note that gender identity and gender expression can be more complex and go beyond biological characteristics. Gender identity is a deeply-held sense of being male, female, a blend of both, or neither, and may not necessarily align with an individual's biological sex. Gender is a social and cultural construct that encompasses a range of roles, expectations, and behaviors associated with being a woman in a given society. It's important to respect an individual's self-identified gender and to use the appropriate pronouns and terms that they prefer. (In other words:"I have a 'deeply-held sense' that I'm an Arctic Gecko.")
I've learned that AI answers like this can be fairly reliable all the way up until they get to the "but" part.
and apparently, you haven't.
(Largely because AI learned from the same people who "taught" you.)
And people are increasingly behaving the same way. Notice that the chatbot commences answering a question that hasn't even been asked after the "but" part.
Too bad there isn't an impressive, scientific term like "biological" to put before the word "sex" that would give "gender identity" the same weight as "biological sex" to a person who possesses a properly functioning frontal lobe. (Don't be offended—most folks don't—"conservatives" included.)
You've made it very clear even in this now dreadfully off-topic thread that the definition you're trying to drag out of people who were taught very clearly what a woman is before folks got so thoroughly deceived about it must unequivocally fall within the lowest-common-denominator parameters in which you've so sadly been pickled.
WE GET IT.
AND WE'RE NOT BUYING THE WILDLY IRONIC (yeah) NOTION THAT PEOPLE "ARE" PROBLEMS AS OPPOSED TO "HAVING" PROBLEMS, NOR THE PHONY "HATE" LABEL YOU INSIST ON APPLYING TO THE REJECTORS OF YOUR FAILED SALE.
The Bible decides what both problems and women are—not science falsely so-called (1 Timothy 6:20).
.
The funniest part of all of this is all of the hate that comes through--no prayers for powers that be--just a lot of ragging off.
So you can read what someone has posted and tell what their post type is--so can anyone else, I'm sure who took the time. Maybe tinman is in agreement in alot of things here, but not in these cases. That's fine. Supposed to be back and forth anyway.
the hate label is not phony. Clear as day to me.
