I can speak for myself, thank you. English is my first and only fluent language. I didn't say nor imply anything about Trump, because I don't have much to say about him. So there's no need for you to interpret and restate what I said as having anything to do with him.
My point was that your activity is limited to socio-political discussion which is most likely to include lots of inflammatory socio-political issues, not the least of which is perversion in society and in the church.
This website has a handy search feature that makes it easy to see what individuals like to talk about.
@amigo de christo didn't ask for a definition. He merely pointed out that some folks are confused about it.
You seize upon such things—that's on you.
Anyway, here's what ChatGPT says:
A woman is an adult human female. In terms of biological sex, women typically have two X chromosomes...
...but it's important to note that gender identity and gender expression can be more complex and go beyond biological characteristics. Gender identity is a deeply-held sense of being male, female, a blend of both, or neither, and may not necessarily align with an individual's biological sex. Gender is a social and cultural construct that encompasses a range of roles, expectations, and behaviors associated with being a woman in a given society. It's important to respect an individual's self-identified gender and to use the appropriate pronouns and terms that they prefer. (In other words:
"I have a 'deeply-held sense' that I'm an Arctic Gecko.")
I've learned that AI answers like this can be fairly reliable all the way up until they get to the
"but" part.
and apparently, you haven't.
(Largely because AI learned from the same people who "taught" you.)
And people are increasingly behaving the same way. Notice that the chatbot commences answering a question that hasn't even been asked after the
"but" part.
Too bad there isn't an impressive, scientific term like "biological" to put before the word "sex" that would give "gender identity" the same weight as "biological sex" to a person
who possesses a properly functioning frontal lobe. (Don't be offended—most folks don't—"conservatives" included.)
You've made it very clear even in this now dreadfully off-topic thread that the definition you're trying to drag out of people who were taught very clearly what a woman is before folks got so thoroughly deceived about it must unequivocally fall within the lowest-common-denominator parameters in which you've so sadly been pickled.
WE GET IT.
AND WE'RE NOT BUYING THE WILDLY IRONIC
(yeah) NOTION THAT PEOPLE
"ARE" PROBLEMS AS OPPOSED TO
"HAVING" PROBLEMS, NOR THE PHONY
"HATE" LABEL YOU INSIST ON APPLYING TO THE REJECTORS OF YOUR
FAILED SALE.
The Bible decides what both problems and women are—not science falsely so-called (1 Timothy 6:20).
.