TinMan
Well-Known Member
The question was are all women able to make and deliver a baby?Yes it is.... unless your mom was not a woman.... And if Mary did not birth Jesus. It is an answer.
My mother isn't all women.
so not an answer
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The question was are all women able to make and deliver a baby?Yes it is.... unless your mom was not a woman.... And if Mary did not birth Jesus. It is an answer.
Ralla's definition is focused solely on reproduction. but if all women can't for what ever reason and it's a huge number that can't. Obviously bilogical reproduction is not a criteria for defining a woman.Which does absolutely nothing to help determine the definition of "woman."
Then why do you care who is and who is not transgendered?And I can't imagine why I would ever possibly need to.
.
The vomiting is one of the nicer things he has ever done in interacting with meI'm not talking about your hate @Barney--sorry for you trying to read yourself into it. I'm talking about the hate for the powers that be. . It goes on and on under the guise of Christianity. You think the women stuff is bad--it pales in comparison to the hate of the president.
BUT
I will say that I think you have changed and I wonder if it is because you have your "Encounter Team" pants on.
"These team members are easily identified in their brightly orange/gold colours and they have been invited to join based on their positive interaction across the board, their friendly demeanour and encouragement. Hebrews 10:23-25 and fruit Gal 5:22-23."
Thank you for continuing to demonstrate your positive interaction with others. I also am very proud of @TinMan for receiving the coveted puking icon thou hast given.
I'm sorry he did that. Sometimes we do things when we are frustrated with the outside world, so then we remember someone on a message board that we can goad and remove some of that worldly frustration. Actually, it may feel therapeutic, but it really isn't. It makes us say things we wouldn't normally say. And if someone is following you around and commenting on your posts, and researching what you have written in the past--isn't that trolling?The vomiting is one of the nicer things he has ever done in interacting with me
Well, I'll give this one to you... I guess.The question was are all women able to make and deliver a baby?
My mother isn't all women.
so not an answer
you mean like name calling and belittling and dismissing someone because of their age or questioning is someone is actually a Christian?
Does defending include false witness? Dehumanizing? called for discrimination? indicating that the topic should induce vomiting?
If you were making the same posts and comments and condemnation of any other minority would it be considered to be hate?
Nope, no hate here.
Maybe you should take it up with the hijacker
You spend several posts harassing me about what threads I choose to respond to, falsely accuse me of hijacking, and when I ask if there was some rule i was breaking here you respond with a demeaning personal attack. Now there is the BarneyFIfe I know
Thanks for being such a great role model.
Well it is tough to back up hate based garbage.
And you are. Good for you.
Still can't provide a definition can you?
not if your aim is to be hypocritical
Ralla's definition is focused solely on reproduction. but if all women can't for what ever reason and it's a huge number that can't. Obviously bilogical reproduction is not a criteria for defining a woman.
Then why do you care who is and who is not transgendered?
If all women can't.... then they must be men or poodles.Ralla's definition is focused solely on reproduction. but if all women can't for what ever reason and it's a huge number that can't. Obviously bilogical reproduction is not a criteria for defining a woman.
Then why do you care who is and who is not transgendered?
Try this.... or is he also a liar?I'm missing the part where Trump offers anyone the National Guard.... Could you point that out.?
Gen. Kellogg: Trump did request Nat’l Guard troops on Jan. 6th; asks Congress to release his testimony
Retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg said last week that former President Donald Trump did in fact request National Guard troops be deployed in Washington D.C. before the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Kellogg said he was present at the time of Trump’s request, and Congress should release his testimony to the public.
Trump has repeatedly claimed he requested National Guard troops be activated in D.C. to provide security as he called on supporters to gather in D.C. to protest the certification of the 2020 election results for Joe Biden. Trump’s claim has been substantiated by members of his administration, but rejected by some members of Congress.
Kellogg, who was serving as Vice President Mike Pence’s National Security Advisor at the time of the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol breach, tweeted last week, “To be clear on 6 Jan/NG. Pg 199 of my book, ‘On 3 Jan the President asked the Def Dept to deploy NG troops’ into DC for J6 contingencies. OK for J6 Cmte to publicly release my full sworn testimony. Release Army Guard and DC Mayor J6 testimonies as well. Would be illuminating.”
Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots
The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.
Former chief Steven Sund -- who resigned his post last week after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for him to step down -- made the assertions in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday.
May 12, 202110:57 AM EDTUpdated 2 years ago
May 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.
Former Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller told a House of Representatives panel that he spoke with Trump on Jan. 3, three days before the now-former president's fiery speech that preceded the violence and led to his second impeachment.
This is why the National Guard didn’t respond to the attack on the Capitol
Hundreds of National Guard troops were posted in the streets of Washington, D.C., on Wednesday afternoon, but there was little they could do to respond as pro-Trump rioters overran the Capitol.
Investigations are imminent, to determine whether the Capitol Police were undermanned and unprepared for the threat posed by two days of rallies against the results of the 2020 election, but the answer as to why troops posted blocks away were unable to respond to the siege is as simple ― or as complicated ― as a morass of bureaucracy.
Simply put, the National Guard only shows up to D.C. when they’ve been invited, and the Capitol Police did not extend that invitation until after the breach, according to a source with knowledge of the process, who was not authorized to speak about it on the record.
don't apologize for his bad behavior.I'm sorry he did that.
TechnicallySometimes we do things when we are frustrated with the outside world, so then we remember someone on a message board that we can goad and remove some of that worldly frustration. Actually, it may feel therapeutic, but it really isn't. It makes us say things we wouldn't normally say. And if someone is following you around and commenting on your posts, and researching what you have written in the past--isn't that trolling?
I'm missing the part where Trump offers anyone the National Guard.... Could you point that out.?
Too bad you don't want to take this seriously.DOn't like the pictures?
Why isn't that information in the "report" linked?Look it up .....you know how to do that.....Try anything but MSNBC or CNN ....
Yet your response to the original pictures and the challenge was to complain about the pictures.Too bad you don't want to take this seriously.
It has nothing to do with whether or not I like your pictures but I suspect you know that, since you are keeping this at "shallow game" level.
Much love!
I wasn't complaining about your pictures, I was pointing out their insufficiency.Yet your response to the original pictures and the challenge was to complain about the pictures.