The Myth of the Poverty of Jesus

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Foreigner

New Member
Apr 14, 2010
2,583
123
0
Well you know what you can do with that.

-- If I am not mistaken, this is your third attempt to tell me you don't care what my opinion is.
Dude, you're doing it wrong :lol:
But I do appreciate how Christ-like your responses are. No, really.......

Yet, the problem I see on this board - including your posts in the past, is the reoccurring idea that molestation and other sex crimes between clergy and children are associated with the Catholic church, as if it is a reflection on the truthfulness of Catholic doctrine.

-- Boloney, and if you know it.
I have never once even implied that the Priest's molestation of children "is a reflection of the truthfulness of Catholic doctrine."
Not once. Not even close.
The molestations and the hierarchy's refusal to address them are the fault of weak men.
While it was systematic within the Catholic church, it has had nothing at all to do with Catholic doctrine.
 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
508
113
73
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
While it was systematic within the Catholic church, it has had nothing at all to do with Catholic doctrine.
While it happened sometimes, it is a gross exaggeration to say it was systematic. You have no evidence but for a few guilty bishops who followed world trends instead of obeying canon law. In the book of Ezekiel, God doesn't obliterate the people of God for their sins, He cleanses and purifies; it was painful then, and it is painful now. The following commentary sheds some light on Ezekiel and how it applies to the Church today. I would say it applies to all believers.

Fr. Barron comments on The Prophet Ezekiel and the Sex Abuse Crisis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OE00MMOh_z0
 

Foreigner

New Member
Apr 14, 2010
2,583
123
0
While it happened sometimes, it is a gross exaggeration to say it was systematic. You have no evidence but for a few guilty bishops spanning 40 years.


-- Am curious. Just how many THOUSAND children have to be sexually assaulted before it is no longer "sometimes?"

And you have no concept of reality whatsoever if you think this has been happening over just the last 40 years.
And do you r-e-a-l-l-y think that all those Bishops made those decisions to send the abusers on to other parishes unilaterally?
How naive (intentionally or otherwise).
 

neophyte

Member
Apr 25, 2012
669
12
18
It just goes to prove that Jesus must have started the Catholic/Apostolic Church and not the myriad of other multi-quasi Christian churches stemming from the 16th century,.His One and Only Church is comprised of sinners,, as Jesus stated, but all the other churches & their break-away cults [ everyone KJV advocates ] beleve they are saints and not sinners. Saved!you say saved, in a pigs eye "saved". You people that believe your "saved" are judging yourselves, forgetting that Jesus is our Judge.
Good and bad members in His Church is foretold by Jesus in [ Matt.13:24-30 ]
The fact of sinful men [ and women ] who are members of God's Covenant people can be seen thoughout the Bible.
 

Strat

Member
Mar 25, 2012
784
29
28
-- If I am not mistaken, this is your third attempt to tell me you don't care what my opinion is.
Dude, you're doing it wrong :lol:
But I do appreciate how Christ-like your responses are. No, really.......

Jerks amuse me....how would i be doing it right ? allowing your ignorant arrogance and stupidity to go unchallenged....the purpose of the thread was to point out that Jesus was not poor....your limitations prohibit you from even comprehending what i meant,which is obvious since now the topic is child molestation....christ like responses..LOL as if you know anything about that





-- Boloney, and if you know it.
I have never once even implied that the Priest's molestation of children "is a reflection of the truthfulness of Catholic doctrine."
Not once. Not even close.
The molestations and the hierarchy's refusal to address them are the fault of weak men.
While it was systematic within the Catholic church, it has had nothing at all to do with Catholic doctrine.
 

aspen

“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Apr 25, 2012
14,110
4,778
113
54
West Coast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Foreigner - if your many posts about sex abuse within the Catholic Church has no reflection on Catholic authority or morality (both included in doctrine) then why do you keep bringing it up? I've never seen you mention sex abuse in schools or other churches - it is always associated with Catholicism according to your posts. Certainly you would agree that 'weak men' are found within every institution.....
 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
508
113
73
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
-- Am curious. Just how many THOUSAND children have to be sexually assaulted before it is no longer "sometimes?"

And you have no concept of reality whatsoever if you think this has been happening over just the last 40 years.
And do you r-e-a-l-l-y think that all those Bishops made those decisions to send the abusers on to other parishes unilaterally?
How naive (intentionally or otherwise).
For the second time, if you are going to quote a statistic, cite your source. Please, count the number of bishops who were convicted of aiding and abbeting a felon. With the media and the internet the way it is, you shouldn't have any problem coming up with whatever figure holds the most shock value. It must give you great pleasure to rub poop in peoples faces. But Catholics aren't real people, are they Foreigner.

Maybe when I see you treating us Catholics like we were human beings, and write as if your mother or your pastor was looking over your shoulder, I'll take you off my ignore list. I will pray that the Lord heal you of whatever it is that makes you so anti-Catholic. May God illuminate your mind and soul with grace. Hope to talk to you later.

How many times have you heard about how poor and destitute Jesus was,those who say this do not know the meaning of the word poverty,true poverty is when you have nothing,no way of getting anything,no authority to command anything,no ability to create anything,no ability to change anything....Jesus had the riches of the Universe at his disposal,he created from nothing what was needed,he commanded the wind and the waves,he had total command of biology,physics and all other things,there is no record of him suffering any physical abuse at the hand of anyone until his time came,he had complete control of every situation,every encounter,every discussion...knowing the thoughts of those he encountered...and in the end he voluntarily laid down his life and said that no man could take it from him....no man other than Jesus has known such a life in this world.

The modern veiw of Jesus as some poor downtrodden,helpless,hapless man just trying to get people to listen to him is nonsesne bordering on blasphemy...he submitted to authority while no man had authority over him,he submitted to suffering voluntarily,it did not just happen to him like it does us where we have no choice but to endure it,if Jesus didn't eat it was because he chose not to not because there was no money to buy food,he had no place to lay his head because he chose it but he did have a place when he chose not to...if we have no food to eat or place to sleep it is highly unlikely that we chose it for ourself....choice is choice while poverty is no choice.

It is we who are poor,we who are destitute and we who suffer without a choice and we who have no control over anything despite all of the nonsense that tells us we do...our only hope is prayer and faith.

Yes, and freedom.

One of the most favorite words people use is the word freedom. It is mostly used in politics since it attracts so many and loved by many. It is something to be perfected. Freedom perfected is when the man himself becomes truly free.
Freedom's obligation is to make man truly free. Many have made a caricature of the word freedom. Freedom is not doing whatever you choose. Freedom is given so that a person has a chance to be good. Goodness however, is not subjective, but objective. In other words, it's not a person doing what he feels is good, but rather, doing what is truly good, such as doing virtuous acts.
If moral values were not objective, then we can't condemn an evil act. Condemning evil actions shows that we presuppose an objective standard to which people apply. To abuse freedom and do evil acts would make you lose your freedom. The more evil actions you do the less freedom you would get.

For example, evil people go to jail or even lose their life since they need to be kept out from the public because we know they can't be trusted when they are free. This is because we ought to do what is right with our freedom.

Freedom is in itself good. However, it is imperfect. A good will followed by a good action perfects the free will. Actions then become a habit and would eventually build a character. This is true for either a good will or a bad will. For example, a person who consents to a bad will, like doing drugs, would make that action a habit and would eventually become a drug addict. However, a person who consents to a good will, like doing virtuous acts, would act upon it, and will make it a habit, and would eventually become a virtuous person. A person who is virtuous is one who is truly free and also happy.
When can man be truly free? A man is truly free when he is not determined by outward circumstances, when he is so far above environment as to be uninfluenced by it. In other words, he is independent. However, an independent person is actually dependent. In fact, every declaration of independence is a declaration of dependence.

Take the Declaration of Independence of the United States for example. In it, it says that people have inalienable rights. However, where did they get this idea from? It came from its theological foundations, that the Creator gave it to them, that makes it "inalienable." In order for the United States to be independent from England, they needed to be dependent on something higher, which is the Creator. If it came from the government, then the government could take it away.

This is where communism failed. Communism destroys human freedom. Man is free in two ways: economic and spiritual. The economic freedom man has is private property since it enables him to call something his own which is outside him. The spiritual freedom is his soul, which makes him independent of dictatorship. Communism destroyed private property and from its atheism, persecuted religion. Not only did it destroy freedom, it destroyed itself since it took out all objective standards.
In this way, politicians could become democratic one day, and become deceitful and full of lies the next day. Every idea according to Karl Marx is "true." When this happens, the country cannot be dependent on something strong. It is built on a shaky foundation which could be swept away. This is what America needs to stay away from.

America has been strong because she is built on a solid foundation, dependent on the Creator. If America does not stay away from relativism, she would end up like a dictatorship and would destroy herself. No society has lasted where its foundation was relativism. This is because a man can't truly be free if relativism is its foundation. Man would make contradictions again and again and would exhaust himself. He needs to be dependent on something which cannot be destroyed. When he does that, then no prison bar, no despair, and no humiliation can affect him. He has peace within himself and this is when he reaches happiness, which is the desire of all men, either consciously or unconsciously.

This is freedom perfected; freedom's obligation.

Apolonio Latar

WARNING: source is Catholic.
 

us2are1

Son Of Man
Sep 14, 2011
895
26
0
Jesus had no material wealth, nor did He have authority over creation, within Himself - the NT says that He came down from Heaven and humbled Himself to the will of the Father. It was His faith and perfect union with the Father's will that gave Him His authority over creation. I do not think anyone believes that Jesus was spiritually poor - many poor people today are actually spiritually rich, as well - but they still have to eat.

I doubt very much if a supermarket of today could have fed 5,000 people with all the fish and bread that they have in stock. Yet Christ did it and carried none of it with Him. Here it is coming around again.
 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
508
113
73
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Jesus had authority over creation. He walked on water, calmed the sea, raised the dead, healed the sick....Interestingly, the Feeding of the Multitudes is the only miracle that appears in all four gospels. What happens next is related, for if He has the authority to multiply temporary food, He certainly has the authority to multiply Eternal Food.
 

Comm.Arnold

New Member
Apr 7, 2011
662
14
0
41
The idea of christs poverty and he was in a state of being beaten down or meek or weak is always troublesome for me. The two main problems are that we generally need some form of shelter, I almost feel like it's a sin to desire a nice house with the granite countertops or one of them nice fancy showers. A homeless shelter and no job almost feel like the only acceptable route for a true follower of christ according to that version of Jesus. It seems like the ultimate commitment to give up all that comfort and even your own space I wish we new more actual facts about Jesus sometimes. Seems like a strange way to provide hope to such a messed up world.
 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
508
113
73
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Comm.Arnold, I can understand how you would get that impression based on the following verses:
Luke 9:58 Matthew 8:20 And Jesus said unto him, Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man has nowhere to lay his head​

[sup]Matthew 5:3 [/sup]“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven​

Let's take a look at some commentaries.
Mathew 8:20. By the fox is meant craft and cunning, by the birds pride. Thus then our blessed Lord answered him; pride and deceit dwell in your heart, but you have left no place for the Son of Man to rest his head, who can rest only in the meek and humble. (St. Augustine) ---​

Jesus Christ rejected this scribe, because he wished to follow Jesus rather through the desire of glory and wealth, hoping to be great in his kingdom, than with the design of perfecting himself in virtue; so that our Saviour answers him: You cannot expect riches from me; who am poorer than the beasts of the field, or birds of the air; they have a place of rest, whereas I have none. (Menochius)​

Matthew 5:3 “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.​

Ver. 3. The poor in spirit;[1] which, according to the common exposition, signifies the humble of mind and heart. Yet some understand it of such as are truly in poverty and want, and who bear their indigent condition with patience and resignation. (Witham) --- That is, the humble; and they whose spirit is not set upon riches. (Challoner) --- It is not without reason that the beatitudes are disposed of in this order. Each preceding one prepares the way for what immediately follows, furnishing us in particular with spiritual arms of such graces as are necessary for obtaining the virtue of the subsequent beatitude. Thus the poor in spirit, i.e. the truly humble, will mourn for their transgressions, and whoever is filled with sorrow and confusion for his own sins, cannot but be just, and behave to others with meekness and clemency; when possessed of these virtues, he then becomes pure and clean of heart. Peace of conscience reigns in this assemblage of virtues, and cannot be expelled the soul by any tribulations, persecutions, or injustices of men. (St. Chrysostom, hom. xv.) What is this poverty of spirit, but humility and contrition? This virtue of humility is placed in the first place, because it is the parent of every other virtue, as pride is the mother of every vice. Pride deprived our first parents of their original innocence, and nothing but humility can restore us to our former purity. We may pray and fast, we may be possessed of mercy, chastity, or any virtues, if humility do not accompany them, they will be like the virtue of the Pharisee, without foundation, without fruit. (Hom. xv.)​

I think there is a difference between biblical poverty and destitution. Biblical poverty rests on the pillar of humility, not the size of your bank account. From my observation, good Christians feel like second class Christians when they don't get healed or don't get financially blessed. They wish they could be like brother/sister so-and-so who sit at the front and clap the loudest. So they sit at the back feeling like they don't have enough faith, when all the while God has called them to a higher purpose: to accept the trials of everyday life and pick up their cross and follow Him. Us Christians often let these people down because they don't get healed and they can't get out of debt and have the appearance of being a second class Christians because they "don't have enough faith". That is putting faith in faith, not faith in God. Wearing your healing and blessing as if it were a badge of spiritual superiority, is pride, not humility...so who is the destitute?

We are supposed to live in the truth in our relationship with God, ourselves, and our neighbor. First of all, we need to remember that God is God and we are not. We live out our relationship with God by being lovingly obedient. Secondly, we live in the truth with ourselves by being just who we are and not trying to be something that we are not.

Finally, we live in truth with our neighbor through mutual respect, kindness, and acceptance. Humble people are delightful to work with and easy to live with. Humble people make great friends and are always fun to be with. Humble people are a joy to dialogue with in forums.

Humility is not an easy virtue to acquire. Benjamin Franklin once wrote: "There is perhaps no one of our natural passions so hard to subdue as pride. Beat it down, stifle it, mortify it as much as one pleases, it is still alive. Even if I could conceive that I had completely overcome it, I should probably be proud of my humility".​

Humility is a gift. We need to ask God to make us humble. But, asking for humility is not enough; we need to do acts of humility. We have many opportunities every day to do many acts of humility. The more we exercise the virtue of humility, the humbler we will become.

A famous football coach was on vacation with his family in Maine. When they walked into a movie theater and sat down, the handful of people that were present in the theatre applauded. He thought to himself, "I can't believe it. People recognize me all the way up here." Then a man came over to him and said, "Thanks for coming. They won't start the movie for less than ten people." :p

The opposite of the virtue of humility is pride. Pride is a very ugly sin that causes terrible disharmony, division and sadness. Humble people are people filled with joy and peace. Humble people know how to build community and be team players. Humble people are wonderful to be with because they are forgetful of themselves. Humble people are kind and compassionate to all those around them.

The proud cultivate an inflated notion of their own consequence. They attribute to themselves those personal traits, abilities, or attributes that they may not really possess.

Those who are ruled by pride yearn to be accounted superior to all others, to dominate them, to impose their own ideas upon them. Proud people constantly strive to be singled out, seeking honors and privileges that will set them apart from more commonplace people.

The proud desire the esteem of other people. They thirst voraciously for adulation, and they thrive on it. They boast of their own qualities and achievements; ostentatious and pompous in their relationships with others, the proud are prone to hypocrisy, assuming the appearance of virtue in order to cover their vices. The only remedy for pride is the virtue of humility.​

Jesus talks about the virtue of poverty but He begins with humility. To accuse others of being puffed up with pride is a sin of pride in itself so we all need to be careful in the way we submit our replies. I admit to punching people back when I get my face slapped, but I keep trying to do better, because the Internet is a ministry that God has called me to and I keep screwing it up.

WARNING: all sources are Catholic. It's for information, I don't proselytize. To those who chronically scour my links/videos/quotes looking for bats to beat Catholics with, please don't click on them or quote me.
 

Comm.Arnold

New Member
Apr 7, 2011
662
14
0
41
As long as you mean to help or do good I don't care if it is Catholic. I'll probably be doing pretty well in a little bit here I'm one of those guys I like the top of the line flat screen and the Porsche and the fancy entry way and staircase to the house and all that. Some days I really don't think Jesus would approve, or ill look like a faker to the true followers.
 

Episkopos

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2011
14,006
21,591
113
66
Montreal
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Comm.Arnold, I can understand how you would get that impression based on the following verses:
Luke 9:58 Matthew 8:20 And Jesus said unto him, Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man has nowhere to lay his head​

[sup]Matthew 5:3 [/sup]“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven​

Let's take a look at some commentaries.

Mathew 8:20. By the fox is meant craft and cunning, by the birds pride. Thus then our blessed Lord answered him; pride and deceit dwell in your heart, but you have left no place for the Son of Man to rest his head, who can rest only in the meek and humble. (St. Augustine) ---​

Jesus Christ rejected this scribe, because he wished to follow Jesus rather through the desire of glory and wealth, hoping to be great in his kingdom, than with the design of perfecting himself in virtue; so that our Saviour answers him: You cannot expect riches from me; who am poorer than the beasts of the field, or birds of the air; they have a place of rest, whereas I have none. (Menochius)​

Matthew 5:3 “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.​

Ver. 3. The poor in spirit;[1] which, according to the common exposition, signifies the humble of mind and heart. Yet some understand it of such as are truly in poverty and want, and who bear their indigent condition with patience and resignation. (Witham) --- That is, the humble; and they whose spirit is not set upon riches. (Challoner) --- It is not without reason that the beatitudes are disposed of in this order. Each preceding one prepares the way for what immediately follows, furnishing us in particular with spiritual arms of such graces as are necessary for obtaining the virtue of the subsequent beatitude. Thus the poor in spirit, i.e. the truly humble, will mourn for their transgressions, and whoever is filled with sorrow and confusion for his own sins, cannot but be just, and behave to others with meekness and clemency; when possessed of these virtues, he then becomes pure and clean of heart. Peace of conscience reigns in this assemblage of virtues, and cannot be expelled the soul by any tribulations, persecutions, or injustices of men. (St. Chrysostom, hom. xv.) What is this poverty of spirit, but humility and contrition? This virtue of humility is placed in the first place, because it is the parent of every other virtue, as pride is the mother of every vice. Pride deprived our first parents of their original innocence, and nothing but humility can restore us to our former purity. We may pray and fast, we may be possessed of mercy, chastity, or any virtues, if humility do not accompany them, they will be like the virtue of the Pharisee, without foundation, without fruit. (Hom. xv.)​

I think there is a difference between biblical poverty and destitution. Biblical poverty rests on the pillar of humility, not the size of your bank account. From my observation, good Christians feel like second class Christians when they don't get healed or don't get financially blessed. They wish they could be like brother/sister so-and-so who sit at the front and clap the loudest. So they sit at the back feeling like they don't have enough faith, when all the while God has called them to a higher purpose: to accept the trials of everyday life and pick up their cross and follow Him. Us Christians often let these people down because they don't get healed and they can't get out of debt and have the appearance of being a second class Christians because they "don't have enough faith". That is putting faith in faith, not faith in God. Wearing your healing and blessing as if it were a badge of spiritual superiority, is pride, not humility...so who is the destitute?


We are supposed to live in the truth in our relationship with God, ourselves, and our neighbor. First of all, we need to remember that God is God and we are not. We live out our relationship with God by being lovingly obedient. Secondly, we live in the truth with ourselves by being just who we are and not trying to be something that we are not.

Finally, we live in truth with our neighbor through mutual respect, kindness, and acceptance. Humble people are delightful to work with and easy to live with. Humble people make great friends and are always fun to be with. Humble people are a joy to dialogue with in forums.

Humility is not an easy virtue to acquire. Benjamin Franklin once wrote: "There is perhaps no one of our natural passions so hard to subdue as pride. Beat it down, stifle it, mortify it as much as one pleases, it is still alive. Even if I could conceive that I had completely overcome it, I should probably be proud of my humility".​

Humility is a gift. We need to ask God to make us humble. But, asking for humility is not enough; we need to do acts of humility. We have many opportunities every day to do many acts of humility. The more we exercise the virtue of humility, the humbler we will become.

A famous football coach was on vacation with his family in Maine. When they walked into a movie theater and sat down, the handful of people that were present in the theatre applauded. He thought to himself, "I can't believe it. People recognize me all the way up here." Then a man came over to him and said, "Thanks for coming. They won't start the movie for less than ten people." :p

The opposite of the virtue of humility is pride. Pride is a very ugly sin that causes terrible disharmony, division and sadness. Humble people are people filled with joy and peace. Humble people know how to build community and be team players. Humble people are wonderful to be with because they are forgetful of themselves. Humble people are kind and compassionate to all those around them.

The proud cultivate an inflated notion of their own consequence. They attribute to themselves those personal traits, abilities, or attributes that they may not really possess.

Those who are ruled by pride yearn to be accounted superior to all others, to dominate them, to impose their own ideas upon them. Proud people constantly strive to be singled out, seeking honors and privileges that will set them apart from more commonplace people.

The proud desire the esteem of other people. They thirst voraciously for adulation, and they thrive on it. They boast of their own qualities and achievements; ostentatious and pompous in their relationships with others, the proud are prone to hypocrisy, assuming the appearance of virtue in order to cover their vices. The only remedy for pride is the virtue of humility.​

Jesus talks about the virtue of poverty but He begins with humility. To accuse others of being puffed up with pride is a sin of pride in itself so we all need to be careful in the way we submit our replies. I admit to punching people back when I get my face slapped, but I keep trying to do better, because the Internet is a ministry that God has called me to and I keep screwing it up.

WARNING: all sources are Catholic. It's for information, I don't proselytize. To those who chronically scour my links/videos/quotes looking for bats to beat Catholics with, please don't click on them or quote me.



Very good post! The way of Christ makes no sense when looked at from the selfish perspective. Children have no trouble with it, however! ;)
 

Foreigner

New Member
Apr 14, 2010
2,583
123
0
For the second time, if you are going to quote a statistic, cite your source. Please, count the number of bishops who were convicted of aiding and abbeting a felon. With the media and the internet the way it is, you shouldn't have any problem coming up with whatever figure holds the most shock value. It must give you great pleasure to rub poop in peoples faces. But Catholics aren't real people, are they Foreigner.

-- Tell me Kepha, do you really need statistics to help you understand how wide-spread this issue is?
http://articles.cnn....harter?_s=PM:US


Draft survey: 4,450 priests accused of sex abuse

February 17, 2004
pixel.gif


Children accused more than 4,000 priests of sexual abuse between 1950 and 2002, according to a draft survey for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
The survey, to be released February 27, found that children made more than 11,000 allegations of sexual abuse by priests. The 4,450 accused priests represent about 4 percent of the 110,000 priests who served during the 52 years covered by the study.
The report is based on a nationwide survey of church records, and was compiled by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice for the conference. The bishops' conference commissioned the survey to get a better understanding of the scope of the crisis.
pixel.gif

pixel.gif

CNN reviewed a draft copy of the survey. Officials said it may be slightly changed before its release.
More than half of the accused priests had only one allegation against them. Nearly 25 percent, or 1,112 priests, had two or three allegations, and almost 13 percent, or 578 priests, had four to nine allegations, according to the draft report. Nearly 3 percent, or 133 of the priests, had 10 or more allegations.
The report said that 6,700 of the 11,000 allegations were investigated and substantiated, and another 1,000 were unsubstantiated. The remaining 3,300 were not investigated because the priests involved had died by the time the allegation was made.
The director of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests said Monday that the survey's numbers are low.
"Bishops have tried to hide this for years, so there is no reason to believe all of a sudden they would change their ways," David Clohessy said. "The only prudent thing to do is to assume this is not the entire truth. This is a survey, not a report or investigation."
SNAP, founded in 1989, describes itself on its Web site as the nation's largest, oldest and most active support group for people victimized by religious authority figures.
The president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a written statement calling the reports "a very sobering and important milestone."
"I have not seen the reports, and so I cannot comment on their substance," the statement from Bishop Wilton D. Gregory said. "But I want to reaffirm that the bishops requested these studies so that we could understand as fully as possible what caused this terrible occurrence in the life of our community to make sure that it never happens again.

So what do we take from just this one article?
- THOUSANDS of children were indeed molested
- Roughly one out of every 25 priests was accused
- The 'multiple allegations' against individual priests means they were likely moved from parish to parish without warning the people.
- There are some accusations that are unsubstantiated, but there are likely many more where the victims didn't come forward out of fear or shame.
- We are talking only about the last 50 years. (Do you really think these abuses only started 50 years ago?)
- We are only talking about the U.S. (Do you really think these abuses didn't happen in Europe, Africa, South America, Mexico, Canada, Australia, etc.?)


And as a sidebar: http://www.nytimes.c...wanted=all&_r=0
"Vatican Declined to Defrock Priest Who Abused Boys."
Interesting read. It even involves the current Pope.
It is the institutionalized activities within the church that are the problem. Not the individual Catholics.
Sounds to me it is the individual Catholics who are paying the highest price for the Church's culture.


As far as your lame, "But Catholics aren't real people, are they Foreigner" you really need to quit with the childish rhetoric.
I have many Catholic family members whom I love dearly. Two of my very best friends are Catholic. One active and one lapsed.
It is not the Catholics that are the problem, it is the church itself.

The only time I have problems with individual Catholics it is when they start sharing tripe about the members of their church being the only ones who are saved, and trying to justify all their church's policies based on church-alone sources.
Sound like anyone you know?


Maybe when I see you treating us Catholics like we were human beings, and write as if your mother or your pastor was looking over your shoulder, I'll take you off my ignore list. I will pray that the Lord heal you of whatever it is that makes you so anti-Catholic. May God illuminate your mind and soul with grace. Hope to talk to you later.

-- Kepha, I think you are mature enough to handle a little criticism. Especially if that criticism is supported by facts.
Especially when you prove yourself repeatedly ready to criticize the beliefs of others here.
Victimhood is not your best quality.

Foreigner - if your many posts about sex abuse within the Catholic Church has no reflection on Catholic authority or morality (both included in doctrine) then why do you keep bringing it up? I've never seen you mention sex abuse in schools or other churches - it is always associated with Catholicism according to your posts. Certainly you would agree that 'weak men' are found within every institution.....

-- Aspen, what do you mean you have never seen me "mention sex abuse in schools or other churches."
THIS was my second post in this thread:

"-- What on earth is the problem with his post?
Thousand of children HAVE been molested at the hands of Priests.
The majority of them have been boys (which indicates a seperate issue altogether).
Many protestant leaders HAVE been busted for sexual perversions and misappropriation of money.
What is he going to be busted for? "Inconvenient accuracy?""


And the only reason I posted that was because Kepha was reporting Axehead just because he mentioned the abuses within the Catholic Church.

If no one has said a word about that thread acknowledging the issue in both Catholic and Protestant churches, that would have been the end of it.

It is you guys commenting, asking questions and making demands that cause the topic to continue.
(Look above. I presented Kepha with facts and links. Still, there is no way he is going to let that drop.)

What you guys have done is make a number of comments, asked questions and then demanded answers..........and then criticize me for talking about it too much.

lol give me a break.

Weak men ARE found in every institution. But as the previous article I posted shows, Protestant churches are more likely to report it and address it, not cover it up.

They address the issue and do everything they can to stop it. But it has been almost the complete opposite within the Catholic Church - at least until recently.




.
 

aspen

“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Apr 25, 2012
14,110
4,778
113
54
West Coast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Jesus had authority over creation. He walked on water, calmed the sea, raised the dead, healed the sick....Interestingly, the Feeding of the Multitudes is the only miracle that appears in all four gospels. What happens next is related, for if He has the authority to multiply temporary food, He certainly has the authority to multiply Eternal Food.

His authority was given to Him from the Father.


Fair enough, Foreigner.

You know that I hardly every respond to post about the sexual abuse scandal within the Catholic Church - there is no defense for such behavior anywhere. However, I have noticed that it is often used against my my church and I wanted to be clear that unfortunately, we all have this problem
 

us2are1

Son Of Man
Sep 14, 2011
895
26
0
Jesus had authority over creation. He walked on water, calmed the sea, raised the dead, healed the sick....Interestingly, the Feeding of the Multitudes is the only miracle that appears in all four gospels. What happens next is related, for if He has the authority to multiply temporary food, He certainly has the authority to multiply Eternal Food.
He has given it all to us.

12 "Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes in Me, the works that I do he will do also;

10 Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak on My own authority; but the Father who dwells in Me does the works.

36 But I have a greater witness than John's; for the works which the Father has given Me to finish--the very works that I do--bear witness of Me, that the Father has sent Me.

5 Remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent and do the first works,
 

Foreigner

New Member
Apr 14, 2010
2,583
123
0
Fair enough, Foreigner.

You know that I hardly every respond to post about the sexual abuse scandal within the Catholic Church - there is no defense for such behavior anywhere. However, I have noticed that it is often used against my my church and I wanted to be clear that unfortunately, we all have this problem

-- I do indeed see where you are coming from.
As I have mentioned before, the pastor of my church has said (and I agree) "There are people in the Catholic Church two blocks away who will be going to heaven, but there are people in these pews today who likely will not be."
Salvation is individual, not collective.
 

neophyte

Member
Apr 25, 2012
669
12
18

Foreigner,Jesus said this: "'If the world hates you, know that it has hated me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you, "A servant is not greater than his master." If they persecuted me, they will persecute you; if they kept my word, they will keep yours also. But all this they will do to you on my account, because they do not know him who sent me." (Jn 15:18-21)​
So here we have the cover up, the scandal, yes Foreigner I agree with you, that all the guilty so involved are very worthy of punishment. But at the same time we have many of the accusers yelling crucify those who are guilty and yet many of those same people are defending abortion rights, homosexuality, gay marriage. Most of these same people hate the Catholic Church and would just love to profit from her suffering.
Rather than focusing on the majority of priests world-wide and down through history whose account of good work, preaching the "Good News "of The Gospel of Jesus and yes martyrdom ,those people will focus only on those that betrayed their Lord. Of course we must never forget the terrible scandle of child molestation that we witnessed and to take measures to never let it happen again. Nobody is saying those guilty should go with out punishment,but what really gripes me is that the anti-Catholic and social media almost never focus on those majority of good faithful clergy who remain loyal to our Lord and His Teachings, who live lives of holiness and dedication as humanly possible. Foreigner , you write 1 in 25 priests were accused, Jesus had 1 in 12 . It doesn't make it right , I'm not saying that, what I am trying to say is that Christ's Church contains sinners, sinners all , including clergy, this tension of there being "good" and " bad" members including clergy of the Church is one foretold by Jesus in Matt. 13: 24-30.