Wow! I was not expecting that! I believe in the plenary inspiration of Scripture, myself.I'm just saying that we have the precedent that inaccuracies, unintentionally, were propagated by the chief Apostle, and God didn't correct him for a long time, so why would we not allow that John, the eldest (upon writing), and obviously most Christ-centric, had more time to receive correction, and had/has a more accurate/edifying Grace-pointed message? His Gospel actually sounds Monergist.
By "the chief Apostle", who do you mean?
Much love!