Hi veteran,
Thanks for your patient reply.
I don't think we can simply imply Satan's angels in the same comparisons like what Jacob saw.
I don't think Jesus was referring to Satan's angels, either. That is my point, though, that both they,
and holy angels, are already on earth.
It's a mistake to try and apply the limitations of power in our earthly realm to the heavenly realm. Satan is a spirit, and he works just as other spirits do on the earth. That operation is similar to how The Holy Spirit works in us, which John revealed when speaking of the "spirit of antichrist" working through wicked men on earth.
You see, Satan did not literally take over Peter's body like some possession sequence from movies
I understand how 'possession' works, (and I haven't seen the movies).
Rather than Peter, Judas is a better example.
John 13:25 He then lying on Jesus' breast saith unto him, Lord, who is it? 26 Jesus answered, He it is, to whom I shall give a sop, when I have dipped [it]. And when he had dipped the sop, he gave [it] to Judas Iscariot, [the son] of Simon. 27 And after the sop Satan entered into him. Then said Jesus to him, That thou doest, do quickly.
Was Jesus speaking to Judas or Satan? How can we tell? (I don't know, but Jesus wasn't resisting him.)
I agree that 'possession' is (probably) not what people think it is, but that a person can yield themselves consciously, deliberately, hopefully and even imploringly, to be filled with evil spirits, is verified by the experiences of those who do that. And Judas was, clearly, an idolater at heart, making him just the sort of person who would have no resistance whatever, to Satan's intrusion.
I'd like to clarify that I was not conscious of trying to link Rev 12:7 - 9 with anything. You seem to have asserted that Satan and his angels weren't/won't be thrown out of heaven until a time in the near future, whereas I believe they've been out of heaven since before the fall, confirmed by Jesus saying before His crucifixion, '
I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven', Luke 10:18.
He placed His statement in immediate apposition to
'And the seventy returned again with joy, saying, Lord, even the devils are subject to us through thy name', Luke 10:17 and,
Luke 10:19 Behold, I give unto you power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy: and nothing shall by any means hurt you. 20 Notwithstanding in this rejoice not, that the spirits are subject unto you; but rather rejoice, because your names are written in heaven.
I don't believe Jesus was speaking figuratively in v 18, and, I believe the authority which we receive through the Holy Spirit, is both necessary and sufficient to close down demonic activity which we encounter. Clearly, this is a privilege of Christians - to pray and to speak in the name of Jesus Christ - but the fact it's needed at all, shows Satan's emissaries present. V18 was a valid statement, similar to John 8:58 in its eternal reach.
Regarding your abandonment of the 'Here' in 'Hereafter', in John 14:30, I think you've taken an indefinable quantity of licence to ignore the 'here'; ;) because the
whole word is
anchored on the 'Here' (meaning 'right this moment where I'm standing'), and as such, the crucifixion
can, correctly, be included in 'hereafter', when He wouldn't speak to them much.
Surely His time on the cross parallels Zech 3:1 - 5, when Satan would most be in His face, accusing Him of all the sins He was bearing?
In light of Luke 10:18, we, like Jesus, should be able to say,
'Get thee behind me Satan'. Mark 8:33, Luke 4:8.
In light of Pentecost, we should be laying hold on words like,
'Greater is He that is in you(/me), than he that is in the world'; 1 John 4:4; that is, if we
believe we have Christ in us by the Holy Spirit, and authority from Him to tread on serpents and scorpions.
We have no real idea how much time He spent with the twelve after His resurrection, but the impression given by Luke and John, is that He appeared and disappeared, rather than
lived with them as He had before the cross.
They teach it meant Christ defeated the devil by His crucifixion and leave off the rest of what He said. And then some take that and run with it further making even more un-Biblical traditions that Christ's Kingdom is now de facto manifested here on earth WITHOUT the requirement of Christ's future return to do that.
I am not denying that Christ will return again bodily. I disagree completely with total Preterism.
But, there could be some merit in seeing Revelation as
a combination of history and prophecy, rather than assuming it is all in the future, as some have been taught, contrarily to the teachings of the historical Church.
Since even fallen spirits can move around, I'm not making any claim for when Rev 12:7 - 9 took, or, takes place, as there is nothing to stop the fallen angels storming the holy angels, and losing again; but why does this have to be a future event?
The presence of Satan and his fallen angels on earth, seems indisputable since before the fall. for many reasons. Happenings in heaven before he was cast out, meant that the tabernacle which the Lord pitched, waited to be purged by a 'better sacrifice'. Heb 9:11, 23.
Therefore, I find difficult to believe it's going to be messed up again - by 'war in heaven' - since He cried, 'It is finished!', and, after His Asension, He has been seated at the Father's right hand waiting for His enemies to be made His footstool. Hebrews 10:12, 13.