pandaflower
Well-Known Member
That's how they get out of having to study the meat of the word.I could cite the verse, but if you are going to turn everything into symbolism/allegory, we won't agree.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That's how they get out of having to study the meat of the word.I could cite the verse, but if you are going to turn everything into symbolism/allegory, we won't agree.
It’s the substance that’s missing, and Jericho knows this, Panda. The evidence wasn’t forthcoming, as I would have asked them to provide the interpretation, something that would have led Jericho down a path they prefer to avoid.That's how they get out of having to study the meat of the word.
If it's a highly symbolic verse and you do not know the interpretation of the section of Scripture, then you are wise not to quote it.
Sometimes the issue isn't whether something is symbolic or literal, but rather the notions and ideas people attach to certain words, ideas that must be tested and validated against the Word of God.Have you considered that not everything is symbolic or that you may have confused the symbolism?
Are you going to accuse God of evil on Judgment Day? I think you'll be looking for a place to HIDE!Many Christians equate Satan with the Devil – and insist they are one and the same. But let’s assume for the sake of argument that this identification is correct:
That Satan, the Accuser, is also the Devil – the personification of evil.
Then the question becomes unavoidable:
If Satan is the Devil – and God is sovereign over Satan – isn’t God ultimately responsible for all the evil Satan causes?
You can’t have it both ways. Either:
God permits Satan’s actions and uses him as a tool (as seen in Job 1),
or
God is opposed to Satan but somehow powerless to stop him, which undermines divine sovereignty.
Most orthodox positions choose the first: God is in control, and Satan operates only with divine permission. But that leads to an unsettling conclusion:
> All suffering, deception, war, and religious strife are part of a divine script – a cosmic drama where Satan plays his role under God’s direction.
If that’s the case, then:
Human suffering becomes a prewritten element of God’s plan.
Religious wars, mass delusion, genocide, and even the “end times” become part of a divine performance.
Human dignity, free will, and the meaning of moral choice are reduced to scripted reactions in a play authored by God.
Is this really consistent with the God revealed by Jesus?
A God who:
Weeps with the brokenhearted (John 11:35)
Wishes that none should perish (2 Peter 3:9)
Warns against religious pride (Matthew 23)
Calls us to love even our enemies (Matthew 5:44)
How can such a God deliberately authorize a supernatural evil force to mislead, destroy, and cause misery?
This theological trap stems largely from a medieval synthesis of biblical and extra-biblical tradition. In the Hebrew Bible, haSatan is not the devil – he is God’s prosecutor, not his opponent. The devil, as a figure of ultimate rebellion and chaos, developed later and was merged with Satan.
If we don’t distinguish between Satan (God’s tester) and the Devil (false god, deceiver), we end up with a theology where:
Evil is part of God’s plan.
People are judged for roles they were assigned.
And the Gospel becomes a rescue from God himself – not from sin or injustice.
The dignity of human life suffers under this view.
It becomes a divine chess game, where our pain serves some “higher purpose” we can never challenge – because Satan is doing God’s will.
So I ask:
If Satan is the Devil, and God is his master, how do we avoid making God the author of all evil?
And if we can’t… isn’t it time to revisit the assumptions?
God allowed evil to enter creation for His reasons. Mankind has not been told why and to make guesses if foolishness.Many Christians equate Satan with the Devil – and insist they are one and the same. But let’s assume for the sake of argument that this identification is correct:
That Satan, the Accuser, is also the Devil – the personification of evil.
Then the question becomes unavoidable:
If Satan is the Devil – and God is sovereign over Satan – isn’t God ultimately responsible for all the evil Satan causes?
You can’t have it both ways. Either:
God permits Satan’s actions and uses him as a tool (as seen in Job 1),
or
God is opposed to Satan but somehow powerless to stop him, which undermines divine sovereignty.
Most orthodox positions choose the first: God is in control, and Satan operates only with divine permission. But that leads to an unsettling conclusion:
> All suffering, deception, war, and religious strife are part of a divine script – a cosmic drama where Satan plays his role under God’s direction.
If that’s the case, then:
Human suffering becomes a prewritten element of God’s plan.
Religious wars, mass delusion, genocide, and even the “end times” become part of a divine performance.
Human dignity, free will, and the meaning of moral choice are reduced to scripted reactions in a play authored by God.
Is this really consistent with the God revealed by Jesus?
A God who:
Weeps with the brokenhearted (John 11:35)
Wishes that none should perish (2 Peter 3:9)
Warns against religious pride (Matthew 23)
Calls us to love even our enemies (Matthew 5:44)
How can such a God deliberately authorize a supernatural evil force to mislead, destroy, and cause misery?
This theological trap stems largely from a medieval synthesis of biblical and extra-biblical tradition. In the Hebrew Bible, haSatan is not the devil – he is God’s prosecutor, not his opponent. The devil, as a figure of ultimate rebellion and chaos, developed later and was merged with Satan.
If we don’t distinguish between Satan (God’s tester) and the Devil (false god, deceiver), we end up with a theology where:
Evil is part of God’s plan.
People are judged for roles they were assigned.
And the Gospel becomes a rescue from God himself – not from sin or injustice.
The dignity of human life suffers under this view.
It becomes a divine chess game, where our pain serves some “higher purpose” we can never challenge – because Satan is doing God’s will.
So I ask:
If Satan is the Devil, and God is his master, how do we avoid making God the author of all evil?
And if we can’t… isn’t it time to revisit the assumptions?
Correct through the creation of a shrewd Serpent to test the first pair.God allowed evil to enter creation for His reasons. Mankind has not been told why and to make guesses if foolishness.
NO, SATAN HAD ALREADY FALLEN AND IN HABOITED THE SERPENT. His goal wwas to get them to disobey so he could gain temporary control of the earth as he did.Correct through the creation of a shrewd Serpent to test the first pair.
There is no evidence, this is simply hearsay, where someone imagines something and repeats it so often that people stop seeking proof and accept the falsehood as truth.NO, SATAN HAD ALREADY FALLEN AND IN HABOITED THE SERPENT. His goal wwas to get them to disobey so he could gain temporary control of the earth as he did.
If Satan is the devil, is God responsible for all evil?
On March 5th, 1944, Maria Valtorta took a dictation from Jesus, writing down what He said about the origin of evil: Below is an excerpt:
Jeremiah 23:21 “I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran: I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied.”
Please, Sabe, let's maintain integrity in what we share. Posting content like this claiming “the Lord spoke to me” without clear scriptural grounding only adds to the spiritual confusion already present among believers. If every personal claim of divine revelation were shared publicly, we would face even more chaos, especially among Christians who struggle to rightly interpret the written Word of God.There have been true and false prophets of God. Maria Valtorta wasn't a prophet, though her Works where God is the Author remain inspired.
Please, Sabe, let's maintain integrity in what we share. Posting content like this claiming “the Lord spoke to me” without clear scriptural grounding only adds to the spiritual confusion already present among believers. If every personal claim of divine revelation were shared publicly, we would face even more chaos, especially among Christians who struggle to rightly interpret the written Word of God.
Sabe, accept the warning and please don’t assume a higher faith, especially when you know that quote is impossible to substantiate!Why do you fear? Jesus taught how to recognize true and false spokespersons of His. Where's your faith? What will it take for you to trust that God will make His true and false spokespersons known, just as He's always done?
Sabe, accept the warning and please don’t assume a higher faith, especially when you know that quote is impossible to substantiate!
You post comes with a touch of arrogance.
What's next? Bleeding statues?
I'm not about empowering arrogance Sabe.What's next? Hopefully you answering my questions in post #95.

I'm not about empowering arrogance Sabe.
March 5th, 1944, Maria Valtorta took a dictation from Jesus, writing down what He said about the origin of evil: Below is an excerpt:
"...evil is a force that originated by itself like certain monstrous diseases in the most wholesome body.
Lucifer was an angel, the most beautiful of all the angels, a perfect spirit, inferior only to God, and yet in his bright essence a vapour of pride arose and he did not scatter it. On the contrary, he condensed it by brooding over it. And evil was born of this incubation. It existed before man. God had hurled him out of Paradise, the cursed incubator of Evil, who had desecrated Paradise. But he is the eternal incubator of Evil and as he can no longer soil Paradise, he has soiled the earth." (The Poem of the Man-God: Vol. I)
Can you prove this?
No that is the bible.There is no evidence, this is simply hearsay, where someone imagines something and repeats it so often that people stop seeking proof and accept the falsehood as truth.