Brakelite
Well-Known Member
- Feb 6, 2020
- 10,876
- 7,252
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
@CTK
I would also suggest that your thinking regarding the Adventist view on the ten horns as being solely secular, is incorrect. As I mentioned in a post elsewhere, upon which I could readily elaborate if questioned, the prophecy explicitly refers to several characteristics of the little horn and the progression of the surviving 7 through the mix of clay and iron. That clay component is not secular, but religious, and the history of Europe is deeply indebted to the machinations of church/state politics and religious persecution through those states that were used as papal agents in her rise to power. The first King of the Franks is a case in point. Used by the papacy in those early days, Clovis warred relentlessly on behalf of the papacy and was responsible in a large part in the dismantling of power of the first of the 3 horns. This was that church state union that characterised the parody throughout is history and remains so today, and which is being today remarkably and prophetically implemented by the rising of the image of the beast in America... An image to that very same union which began with Clovis. Other of those horns were equally subservient to the popes, with the exception of those that refused to submit to papal authority, and were subsequently uprooted. The reason? Not secular, but religious. They were Arian. At least that was the accusation that is today commonly accepted, however I suspect the term Arian today doesn't mean precisely the same as it did centuries, and whether those nations were truly Arian in the modern sense of the word is doubtful. After all, we are taking their enemy's word for that. But nevertheless, they were defeated for religious reasons, not secular. Adventism does not view them solely as a secular paradigm, not by any means.
All those nations at one time or other accepted the gospel. That it was distorted through papal influence is a matter of history and and spiritual truth.
I would also suggest that your thinking regarding the Adventist view on the ten horns as being solely secular, is incorrect. As I mentioned in a post elsewhere, upon which I could readily elaborate if questioned, the prophecy explicitly refers to several characteristics of the little horn and the progression of the surviving 7 through the mix of clay and iron. That clay component is not secular, but religious, and the history of Europe is deeply indebted to the machinations of church/state politics and religious persecution through those states that were used as papal agents in her rise to power. The first King of the Franks is a case in point. Used by the papacy in those early days, Clovis warred relentlessly on behalf of the papacy and was responsible in a large part in the dismantling of power of the first of the 3 horns. This was that church state union that characterised the parody throughout is history and remains so today, and which is being today remarkably and prophetically implemented by the rising of the image of the beast in America... An image to that very same union which began with Clovis. Other of those horns were equally subservient to the popes, with the exception of those that refused to submit to papal authority, and were subsequently uprooted. The reason? Not secular, but religious. They were Arian. At least that was the accusation that is today commonly accepted, however I suspect the term Arian today doesn't mean precisely the same as it did centuries, and whether those nations were truly Arian in the modern sense of the word is doubtful. After all, we are taking their enemy's word for that. But nevertheless, they were defeated for religious reasons, not secular. Adventism does not view them solely as a secular paradigm, not by any means.
All those nations at one time or other accepted the gospel. That it was distorted through papal influence is a matter of history and and spiritual truth.
Last edited:






