This sounds like an old Peewee Herman ruse "I know I am but what are you?"May I say that you are saying an argument of silence is a fallacy of logic while arguing from silence
I am not arguing from silence. You are the one making the hertical comment there are two different churches. Yet you hardly present any scripture. Are you a student of Les Feldick?It's ok for you to argue from silence when you say Peter didn't have to teach the church members that they were the body for them, and us, to know it.
The burden of proof is on you. You are the one making the hertical comment there are two different churches. Prove it. Don't try to flip the script:If you are going to claim there is just one church and that's the body of Christ, you have to have some scripture from Jesus or the twelve saying it. Paul does teach and say that it's members are the body of Christ. If something isn't said, how can we know of it?
Eph 4:4-6
There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; One Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.
These verses do not leave room for another gospel or two separate churches of Jesus Christ.
