How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

MonoBiblical

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2024
1,560
257
83
52
midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Let's try again:

John 15:2
A 2 "Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit, He takes away;
one type of branch IT gets taken away.

B and every branch that bears fruit, He prunes it so that it may bear more fruit; another type of branch IT gets pruned.

Branch A does not bear fruit -it gets taken away.

Branch B does bear fruit-it gets pruned.
What would settle this? Prune may be only fruit related in English.
 

GodsGrace

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2017
17,514
8,609
113
Tuscany
Faith
Christian
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
What would settle this? Prune may be only fruit related in English.
Take away means to remove from the vine.
The branches that do not bear fruit, get taken away.

Prune means to cut in such a way as to allow the branch to make more fruit...
it does NOT get taken away but remains on the vine.

It's Jesus using a vine and branches to speak of Himself and us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MonoBiblical

MonoBiblical

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2024
1,560
257
83
52
midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Take away means to remove from the vine.
The branches that do not bear fruit, get taken away.

Prune means to cut in such a way as to allow the branch to make more fruit...
it does NOT get taken away but remains on the vine.

It's Jesus using a vine and branches to speak of Himself and us.
Sharped or cut away, but the next verb does not mean prune, though it used only 2 times in Stephanus' TR. It might be Scriveners' TR in the BLB.
 

GodsGrace

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2017
17,514
8,609
113
Tuscany
Faith
Christian
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
Sharped or cut away, but the next verb does not mean prune, though it used only 2 times in Stephanus' TR. It might be Scriveners' TR in the BLB.
I don't know the sources you've posted.
I do see that when we prune a tree it makes more fruit.

And if a branch is dead,,,it gets removed from the tree.

You could reply, but I'm shutting down till tomorrow...
 

TazzJazz

Active Member
Jun 16, 2025
133
132
43
34
Canton
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
YOU believe the end is fast approaching?
Interesting
Jesus said we cannot know the time but only our Father in heaven. Mark 13
Wait... you don't believe the end is coming soon? That is interesting.

Yes, Jesus said that we wouldn't know 'the day or hour', but He gave signs to look for. (Matthew 24, Luke 21, Mark 13) Signs
that started being fulfilled in 1914.

Jesus said to "keep in expectation" for His return. "Keep on the watch." (Matthew 24:42) But you know this.

In fact, Jesus indicated in Matthew 24:48, that it would be a wicked slave who would say, "My Master is delaying", and then act wickedly.

Have a good night.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aunty Jane

rvmb

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2025
1,252
330
83
Adelaide
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Hey Tazz, I believe that Matt 24:48 refers to a period after 1 Thess 4:17 :)
 

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
8,936
5,047
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
UH-OH Aunty
That’s not really a response David....are you going to disagree with me scripturally?

You are welcome to disagree on any particular point.....but please substantiate it with Scripture.
We can discuss.....
 

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
8,936
5,047
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
I'll try to remember to look those references up one fine day.

No, i'm a rather ignorant person...
I only speak English, Italian, Spanish and possibly, according to some, a 4th language.

And you will NOT be learning Greek by using Strongs.


Oh,,but I've already confessed to being ignorant Auntie Jane.
YOU believe the end is fast approaching?
Interesting.
Jesus said we cannot know the time but only our Father in heaven. Mark 13

I wouldn't answer those questions.
Because YOU already know EVERYTHING.
You are behaving like someone backed into a corner.....questions are a good way to determine what a person believes and why they believe it.....this is a Bible discussion site after all, and it is not my intention to have you become so defensive that you feel threatened and reply the way you have.

A debate on any Bible topic is for the benefit of all who want to read it.....readers can evaluate beliefs and activities of those who profess to be Christians....and make decisions for themselves about what they hear. There are many more readers here than posters....we owe them at least a civil exchange.

This is the forum to discuss “unorthodox” topics....OK?
 

The Learner

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2022
4,833
1,453
113
69
Brighton
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The Father is not the Logos.

The Word/Logos is the logic/reason/plan/meaning

The Word/Logos became flesh/Jesus.

Logos in the Gospel of John​

The leading use of logos in its unique sense occurs in the opening chapter of John’s Gospel. This chapter introduces the idea that Jesus is the Word: the Word that existed prior to creation, the Word that exists in connection to God, the Word that is God, and the Word that became human, cohabited with people, and possessed a glory that can only be described as the glory of God (John 1:1 , 14 ).

As the Gospel of John never uses logos in this unique, technical manner again after the first chapter, and never explicitly says that the logos is Jesus, many have speculated that the Word-prologue predates the Gospel in the form of an earlier hymn or liturgy.2 However, there is little evidence for this, and attempts to recreate the hymn are highly speculative.3 While there is a multitude of theories for why the Gospel writer selected the logos concept-word, the clear emphasis of the opening of the Gospel and entrance of the Word into the world is cosmological, reflecting the opening of Genesis 1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: St. SteVen

MonoBiblical

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2024
1,560
257
83
52
midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States

Logos in the Gospel of John​

The leading use of logos in its unique sense occurs in the opening chapter of John’s Gospel. This chapter introduces the idea that Jesus is the Word: the Word that existed prior to creation, the Word that exists in connection to God, the Word that is God, and the Word that became human, cohabited with people, and possessed a glory that can only be described as the glory of God (John 1:1 , 14 ).

As the Gospel of John never uses logos in this unique, technical manner again after the first chapter, and never explicitly says that the logos is Jesus, many have speculated that the Word-prologue predates the Gospel in the form of an earlier hymn or liturgy.2 However, there is little evidence for this, and attempts to recreate the hymn are highly speculative.3 While there is a multitude of theories for why the Gospel writer selected the logos concept-word, the clear emphasis of the opening of the Gospel and entrance of the Word into the world is cosmological, reflecting the opening of Genesis 1.
The main LOGOS in John's theology is still the Father. The son is secondary.

In the beginning, it was a word, and a word it was with a God, and the God it was. A word another it was in the beginning with a God.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Learner

The Learner

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2022
4,833
1,453
113
69
Brighton
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
This is a good question. Let's take a look at both sides
In defense of it:
View attachment 74477

Evidence against it:

1) All wrote extensively on the Trinity and never cite 1 John 5:7.
  • Athanasius
  • Basil the Great
  • Gregory of Nyssa
  • Gregory Nazianzen
  • Chrysostom
  • Cyril of Alexandria
This silence is considered decisive evidence against its originality.

2) The earliest Latin Fathers do not cite the heavenly witnesses clause:
  • Tertullian
  • Cyprian (important because some claim he quoted it)
  • Augustine
  • Jerome (in his authentic writings)
  • Ambrose
None of these men quote the Comma Johanneum as found in the KJV

3) What About Cyprian?
Cyprian wrote (c. AD 250):

Key points:
  • Cyprian is not quoting Scripture here; he is applying verse 8 (the Spirit, water, and blood) typologically to the Trinity.
  • Early Latin manuscripts of 1 John do not contain the Comma at this time.
  • All modern textual scholars agree Cyprian did not know the Comma Johanneum.

Conclusion? 1 Jn 5:7 was probably a marginal note that was later forced into the text. However, the doctrine of the Trinity can still be defended without it.
Cyprian quotes 1 John 5:7 in the year 250 A.D.
ANF05. Fathers of the Third Century: Hippolytus, Cyprian, Caius, Novatian, Appendix | Christian Classics Ethereal Library

"The Lord warns, saying, "He who is not with me scattereth." He who breaks the peace and the concord of Christ, does so in opposition to Christ; he who gathereth elsewhere than in the Church, scatters the Church of Christ. The Lord says, "I and the Father are one;" and again it is written of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit," And these three are one."
 

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
8,936
5,047
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
The main LOGOS in John's theology is still the Father. The son is secondary.
The son is always secondary to the Father in all things....he never once elevated himself to be equal to his God and Father....and stated clearly that what he taught was not of his own initiative, but everything was from his Father...the one who “sent” him. (John 7:14-16; John 8:42)
In the beginning, it was a word, and a word it was with a God, and the God it was. A word another it was in the beginning with a God.
We first of all have to understand what it means where the Logos is said to have been “in the beginning with God”, stated twice by John in verses 1 & 2.

Since God, Yahweh is an eternal,Being, he did not have a “beginning”. So what is this the “beginning” of?

Revelation 3:12 answers that question....

“And to the angel of the church in Laodicea write: ‘The words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of God's creation.” (ESV)

Jesus is called “the Amen” because he is the guarantee of all of God’s promises. He is also his Father’s greatest Witness, as his whole ministry revolved around teaching others about his God and Father.

So, the meaning if the word “logos” covers a wide range of applications....

Strongs defines “logos” as....

of speech
  1. a word, uttered by a living voice, embodies a conception or idea
  2. what someone has said
    1. a word
    2. the sayings of God
    3. decree, mandate or order
    4. of the moral precepts given by God
    5. Old Testament prophecy given by the prophets
    6. what is declared, a thought, declaration, aphorism, a weighty saying, a dictum, a maxim”

So calling Jesus by that title, basically meant that Jesus spoke God’s words, or spoke as his representative.

As the appointed “mediator between God and men” (1 Tim 2:5) Jesus’ role as God’s spokesman was invaluable. As no sinful human can come before God, Jesus is the ‘bridge’ or “go between”, who intercedes on our behalf so that we can still communicate with our God through him.

The teaching of the trinity makes that role redundant because if Jesus is God, we would need a mediator between us and him as well.....

So the logos could become flesh and communicate with sinful humans because he was the divine “son of God” appointed to act on our behalf, as well to act on behalf of his Father. The trinity loses sight of his role as “mediator” who is the one appointed to bring about reconciliation between two estranged parties.....he therefore cannot be one of the parties.

He is also the sacrifice that facilitates forgiveness of our sins, leading to everlasting life.
As God is immortal, he cannot die, so he “sent” his son to die instead of us.

The trinity just messes up a fairly simple exchange that God arranged to rescue us from the rebellion that took place in Eden, that is what robbed us of the life that God planned for us at the beginning.....Jesus came to get it back for us....(Rev 21:2-4) The greatest act of love ever offered to mankind.....

Not complicated at all.
 

GodsGrace

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2017
17,514
8,609
113
Tuscany
Faith
Christian
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
Wait... you don't believe the end is coming soon? That is interesting.
AI might be causing the end to come - in my humble opinion.

But I can't say this for sure.
Yes, Jesus said that we wouldn't know 'the day or hour', but He gave signs to look for. (Matthew 24, Luke 21, Mark 13) Signs
that started being fulfilled in 1914.
Right.
Except I see these signs all throughout history.
Every generation believed the end was near.
Think of the holocaust...if we were alive we certainly would have thought it was the end...
and yet we're still here.

I DO see increasing wickedness...partly due to post modernism and the subjective value/moral system that the young are embracing.
Jesus said to "keep in expectation" for His return. "Keep on the watch." (Matthew 24:42) But you know this.

In fact, Jesus indicated in Matthew 24:48, that it would be a wicked slave who would say, "My Master is delaying", and then act wickedly.

Have a good night.
Replied to above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Learner

GodsGrace

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2017
17,514
8,609
113
Tuscany
Faith
Christian
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
You are behaving like someone backed into a corner.....questions are a good way to determine what a person believes and why they believe it.....this is a Bible discussion site after all, and it is not my intention to have you become so defensive that you feel threatened and reply the way you have.

A debate on any Bible topic is for the benefit of all who want to read it.....readers can evaluate beliefs and activities of those who profess to be Christians....and make decisions for themselves about what they hear. There are many more readers here than posters....we owe them at least a civil exchange.

This is the forum to discuss “unorthodox” topics....OK?
I'm NEVER backed into a corner.
I just find it difficult to discuss with you...
it's not personal.
You write a lot and I don't have a lot of time here
and you just keep repeating the same over and over
and your HATRED for the CC is most unchristianly.
I dislike reformed/calvinist theolgy and yet I feel no HATRED for that church.
Hatred should not be part of our attitude.

You make silly comments like: The bible was not written in English.

@BreadOfLife is doing a good job of replying to your comments and I leave you to him,,,who has much more stamina than I ever will.

And yes,,, this discussion does belong in the UNORTHODOX FORUM
because JWs IS an unorthodox religon/faith/belief system.
 
  • Love
Reactions: The Learner

rvmb

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2025
1,252
330
83
Adelaide
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
That’s not really a response David....are you going to disagree with me scripturally?

You are welcome to disagree on any particular point.....but please substantiate it with Scripture.
We can discuss.....
Trinity is a tag used by some who believe as I do that The Father, The Son(in some form), The HS pre-existed Creation
 
  • Love
Reactions: The Learner

St. SteVen

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2023
18,269
6,823
113
71
Minneapolis
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Trinity is a tag used by some who believe as I do that The Father, The Son(in some form), The HS pre-existed Creation
I would say, there was no Trinity before the Incarnation. When the Word (Logos) became flesh.
At the point of Jesus' conception, there was God the Father and God the Son and God the Holy Spirit.
 
  • Love
Reactions: The Learner

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
8,936
5,047
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Trinity is a tag used by some who believe as I do that The Father, The Son(in some form), The HS pre-existed Creation
It’s more than just a tag...it’s the very foundation upon which Christendom is built....so you can’t just pass it off as something as simple as you said. You have to understand at a very deep level what is taught about these three in the whole Bible, as Jesus and his apostles taught about them.

It is a salvation issue, as Jesus said.....
“And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.” (ESV)
We have to “know” “the only true God” because the devil is the promoter of false gods who enslave people all over the world. Has he perverted the identity of the “one God” of the Hebrew Scriptures? (Deut 6:4) What a great way to induce people to disobey God....by lying to them.....isn’t this what happened in Eden?

And Jesus said we need to “know” the one whom God “sent”.
So where is the equal third party here? Why don’t we need to “know” the “Holy Spirit” if he is part of who God is?

Who did the apostles collectively say was their “one God”?
1 Cor 8:5-6...
“For although there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth—as indeed there are many “gods” and many “lords”— yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist.” (ESV)

Again..no third party is mentioned.....why? Because in the first century, the trinity did not exist, and was not taught by the apostles. It was a later adoption, introduced by the “weeds” whom Jesus said were sown by the devil, in a counterfeit “Christianity”.

I also believe that the Father, the son, and the Holy Spirit pre-existed creation because that is what Scripture teaches....but none of them are presented in the Bible as three parts of one God.

There is not a single Scripture where Jesus or his Father categorically states that they are equal parts of God with the Holy Spirit. If you can find one, I’ll show you with other Scripture that it is a deliberate mistranslation to promote a doctrine....not Bible based truth.