Do you believe this statement: "Jesus is YHWH", Yes or No?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Do you believe and agree with the following statement: "Jesus is YHWH." Yes or No?


  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .

dak

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2013
1,457
188
63
Messianica
sites.google.com
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Abba FATHER Says you should believe My WORD, for if you do, the HOLY SPIRIT will be your Guide

Okay, what about this WORD:

Exodus 20:3 WLC
לֹֽ֣א יִהְיֶֽה־ לְךָ֛֩ אֱלֹהִ֥֨ים אֲחֵרִ֖֜ים
עַל־ פָּנָֽ֗יַ

You shall have no other elohim to/unto/against My face

עַל ‛al
BDB Definition:
1) upon, on the ground of, according to, on account of, on behalf of, concerning, beside, in addition to, together with, beyond, above, over, by, on to, towards, to, against (preposition)
1a) upon, on the ground of, on the basis of, on account of, because of, therefore, on behalf of, for the sake of, for, with, in spite of, notwithstanding, concerning, in the matter of, as regards
1b) above, beyond, over (of excess)
1c) above, over (of elevation or pre-eminence)
1d) upon, to, over to, unto, in addition to, together with, with (of addition)
1e) over (of suspension or extension)
1f) by, adjoining, next, at, over, around (of contiguity or proximity)
1g) down upon, upon, on, from, up upon, up to, towards, over towards, to, against (with verbs of motion)
1h) to (as a dative)
2) because that, because, notwithstanding, although (conjunction)
Part of Speech: see above in Definition
A Related Word by BDB/Strong’s Number: properly, the same as H5920 used as a preposition (in the singular or plural often with prefix, or as conjunction with a particle following)
Same Word by TWOT Number: 1624p
Total KJV Occurrences: 2327

Lol, Hebrew עַל is extremely similar to Greek προς: they could have actually rendered it correctly by the same word, (even without the pointing, as there was none in the first century), but they chose according to their dogma.

John 1:1
1 εν αρχη ην ο λογος και ο λογος ην προς τον Θ̅Ν και Θ̅C ην ο λογος


Greek #4314 πρός
1. forward to, i.e. toward
2. (genitive case) the side of, i.e. pertaining to
3. (dative case) by the side of, i.e. near to
4. (accusative case, usually) the place, time, occasion, or respect (which is the destination of the relation, i.e. whither or for which it is predicated)

HELPS Word-studies
4314
prós (a preposition) – properly, motion towards to "interface with" (literally, moving toward a goal or destination).

4314 /prós ("towards, with") indicates "extension toward a goal, with implied interaction or reciprocity (L & N, 1, 84.18), with "presumed contact and reaction" (L & N, 1, 84.23). 4314 (prós) naturally suggests the cycle of initiation and response (L-N, 1,90.25, 90.33).

[4314 (prós) can mean "in view of," or "in light of, but never "against," except where the context indicates an active exchange (interface) done in opposition.]

Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 4314: πρός

2. it is used of close proximity — the idea of direction, though not entirely lost, being more or less weakened;

a. answering to our at or by (German an); after verbs of fastening, adhering, moving (to): δεδέσθαι πρός τήν θύραν, Mark 11:4; προσκολλᾶσθαι, Mark 10:7 R G Tr (in marginal reading brackets); Ephesians 5:31 R G WH text; προσκόπτειν, Matthew 4:6; Luke 4:11; κεῖσθαι, equivalent to to be brought near to, Matthew 3:10; Luke 3:9 ((cf. 2 Macc. 4:33)); τιθέναι, Acts 3:2; (Acts 4:37 Tdf. (others παρά)); add, βεβλησθαι, Luke 16:20; τά πρός τήν θύραν, the forecourt (see θύρα, a.), Mark 2:2; εἶναι πρός τήν θάλασσαν (properly, toward the sea (A. V. by the sea)), Mark 4:1; θερμαίνεσθαι πρός τό φῶς, turned to the light (R. V. in the light), Mark 14:54; καθῆσθαι πρός τό φῶς, Luke 22:56; πρός τό μνημεῖον, John 20:11 Rec.; cf. Fritzsche on Mark, p. 201f
b. equivalent to (Latinapud) with, with the accusative of a person, after verbs of remaining, dwelling, tarrying, etc. (which require one to be conceived of as always turned toward one), cf. Fritzsche as above: after εἶναι, Matthew 13:56; Mark 6:3; Mark 9:19; Mark 14:49; Luke 9:41; John 1:1;

Thayer gives a large and extensive treatment of this word; so I copied only that portion which includes the usage in John 1:1, (the top portion of section 2b). Note what he says about the rendering "with". In that section, (b), he places in parenthesis, (which require one to be conceived of as always turned toward one), then gives a list which I have copied only up to where he includes John 1:1.

The statement he makes in parenthesis is no different than saying which require one to be conceived as always turned toward another. But for some strange reason he decides not to put it in that terminology, (Gee, I wonder why? perhaps he believed that one plus one plus one equals one?). Thayer tries his best to hide it but still yet he gives away the truth: we have two "ones" in the Trinitarian interpretation of John 1:1 and those two "ones" are two Gods, (whether or not you call them "persons"), because although they are in extremely close proximity, (face to face or side by side), they are still separate entities or beings. There are several different understandings and readings, which are according to the scriptures, which would correct this error: but none of them bode well for the Trinity doctrine. As I said previously in this thread: pros is a Trinitarian error rendered into the Greek text from a fault translation of the earlier Hebrew text.
 

David in NJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
16,392
8,944
113
50
Denville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Okay, what about this WORD:

Exodus 20:3 WLC
לֹֽ֣א יִהְיֶֽה־ לְךָ֛֩ אֱלֹהִ֥֨ים אֲחֵרִ֖֜ים
עַל־ פָּנָֽ֗יַ

You shall have no other elohim to/unto/against My face

עַל ‛al
BDB Definition:
1) upon, on the ground of, according to, on account of, on behalf of, concerning, beside, in addition to, together with, beyond, above, over, by, on to, towards, to, against (preposition)
1a) upon, on the ground of, on the basis of, on account of, because of, therefore, on behalf of, for the sake of, for, with, in spite of, notwithstanding, concerning, in the matter of, as regards
1b) above, beyond, over (of excess)
1c) above, over (of elevation or pre-eminence)
1d) upon, to, over to, unto, in addition to, together with, with (of addition)
1e) over (of suspension or extension)
1f) by, adjoining, next, at, over, around (of contiguity or proximity)
1g) down upon, upon, on, from, up upon, up to, towards, over towards, to, against (with verbs of motion)
1h) to (as a dative)
2) because that, because, notwithstanding, although (conjunction)
Part of Speech: see above in Definition
A Related Word by BDB/Strong’s Number: properly, the same as H5920 used as a preposition (in the singular or plural often with prefix, or as conjunction with a particle following)
Same Word by TWOT Number: 1624p
Total KJV Occurrences: 2327

Lol, Hebrew עַל is extremely similar to Greek προς: they could have actually rendered it correctly by the same word, (even without the pointing, as there was none in the first century), but they chose according to their dogma.

John 1:1
1 εν αρχη ην ο λογος και ο λογος ην προς τον Θ̅Ν και Θ̅C ην ο λογος


Greek #4314 πρός
1. forward to, i.e. toward
2. (genitive case) the side of, i.e. pertaining to
3. (dative case) by the side of, i.e. near to
4. (accusative case, usually) the place, time, occasion, or respect (which is the destination of the relation, i.e. whither or for which it is predicated)

HELPS Word-studies
4314
prós (a preposition) – properly, motion towards to "interface with" (literally, moving toward a goal or destination).

4314 /prós ("towards, with") indicates "extension toward a goal, with implied interaction or reciprocity (L & N, 1, 84.18), with "presumed contact and reaction" (L & N, 1, 84.23). 4314 (prós) naturally suggests the cycle of initiation and response (L-N, 1,90.25, 90.33).

[4314 (prós) can mean "in view of," or "in light of, but never "against," except where the context indicates an active exchange (interface) done in opposition.]

Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 4314: πρός

2. it is used of close proximity — the idea of direction, though not entirely lost, being more or less weakened;

a. answering to our at or by (German an); after verbs of fastening, adhering, moving (to): δεδέσθαι πρός τήν θύραν, Mark 11:4; προσκολλᾶσθαι, Mark 10:7 R G Tr (in marginal reading brackets); Ephesians 5:31 R G WH text; προσκόπτειν, Matthew 4:6; Luke 4:11; κεῖσθαι, equivalent to to be brought near to, Matthew 3:10; Luke 3:9 ((cf. 2 Macc. 4:33)); τιθέναι, Acts 3:2; (Acts 4:37 Tdf. (others παρά)); add, βεβλησθαι, Luke 16:20; τά πρός τήν θύραν, the forecourt (see θύρα, a.), Mark 2:2; εἶναι πρός τήν θάλασσαν (properly, toward the sea (A. V. by the sea)), Mark 4:1; θερμαίνεσθαι πρός τό φῶς, turned to the light (R. V. in the light), Mark 14:54; καθῆσθαι πρός τό φῶς, Luke 22:56; πρός τό μνημεῖον, John 20:11 Rec.; cf. Fritzsche on Mark, p. 201f
b. equivalent to (Latinapud) with, with the accusative of a person, after verbs of remaining, dwelling, tarrying, etc. (which require one to be conceived of as always turned toward one), cf. Fritzsche as above: after εἶναι, Matthew 13:56; Mark 6:3; Mark 9:19; Mark 14:49; Luke 9:41; John 1:1;

Thayer gives a large and extensive treatment of this word; so I copied only that portion which includes the usage in John 1:1, (the top portion of section 2b). Note what he says about the rendering "with". In that section, (b), he places in parenthesis, (which require one to be conceived of as always turned toward one), then gives a list which I have copied only up to where he includes John 1:1.

The statement he makes in parenthesis is no different than saying which require one to be conceived as always turned toward another. But for some strange reason he decides not to put it in that terminology, (Gee, I wonder why? perhaps he believed that one plus one plus one equals one?). Thayer tries his best to hide it but still yet he gives away the truth: we have two "ones" in the Trinitarian interpretation of John 1:1 and those two "ones" are two Gods, (whether or not you call them "persons"), because although they are in extremely close proximity, (face to face or side by side), they are still separate entities or beings. There are several different understandings and readings, which are according to the scriptures, which would correct this error: but none of them bode well for the Trinity doctrine. As I said previously in this thread: pros is a Trinitarian error rendered into the Greek text from a fault translation of the earlier Hebrew text.
You missed the Truth again.

#1 = Elohim is THREE = FATHER/WORD/HOLY SPIRIT =3
#2 - Elohim is Echad = Hear O Israel YHWH our ELOHENU YHWH is Echad = 3x
#3 - Lord Jesus Christ = YHWH YAHshua HaMashiach = 3x
#4 - HOLY HOLY HOLY = 3x
#5 - Matthew 3:16-17 = 3x
#6 - WAY the TRUTH the LIFE = 3x
#7 - in 3 days =His Resurrection
#8 - LORD GOD ALMIGHTY =
3x

and MORE
 

dak

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2013
1,457
188
63
Messianica
sites.google.com
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
Gender
Male
You missed the Truth again.

#1 = Elohim is THREE = FATHER/WORD/HOLY SPIRIT =3
#2 - Elohim is Echad = Hear O Israel YHWH our ELOHENU YHWH is Echad = 3x
#3 - Lord Jesus Christ = YHWH YAHshua HaMashiach = 3x
#4 - HOLY HOLY HOLY = 3x
#5 - Matthew 3:16-17 = 3x
#6 - WAY the TRUTH the LIFE = 3x
#7 - in 3 days =His Resurrection
#8 - LORD GOD ALMIGHTY =
3x

and MORE

If I am not the type to formulate doctrine based on numerology, (as I just said several posts back), then why would you think I would believe your doctrine based on numerology? It doesn't prove anything, it's just cherry-picked occasions where you find threes, either that or force a way to find threes in your preferred English translation(s).

The same thing can be done with sevens and probably other numbers too:

1) The Seven Yamim of the opening creation account - Gen 1->Gen 2:3
2) The Seven Plunges of the Immersion of Yohannei the Immerser - 2 Kings 5:10-14
3) The Seven Lamps of Fire burning before the throne - Rev 4:5
4) The Seven Spirits of Elohim - Rev 4:5
5) The book sealed with Seven Seals - Rev 5:1
6) The Seven Horns of the Lamb - Rev 5:6
7) The Seven Eyes of the Lamb which are the Seven Spirits of YHWH Elohim sent forth into all His land - Rev 5:6, Zec 3:9, Zec 4:10

Why therefore are you not teaching this numerology also? According to your reliance on numerology, shouldn't you now begin bowing down and worshiping the Seven Holy Spirits of Elohim, and of YHWH, and of the Lamb?

Would you like me to tell you the names of the Seven Spirits?

1) Ruach haYom - the Spirit of the Light and of the Day - Gen 3:8
2) Ruach Mishpat - the Spirit of Justice and Judgment - Isa 4:4, Isa 28:6
3) Ruach Ba`er - the Spirit of Kindling and Burning - Isa 4:4
4) Ruach Hokmah - the Spirit of Wisdom and Understanding - Isa 11:2
5) Ruach `Etzah - the Spirit of Council and Might - Isa 11:2
6) Ruach Da`at - the Spirit of Knowledge and of the reverential fear of YHWH - Isa 11:2
7) Ruach Chen - the Spirit of Grace and Compassion - Zec 12:10 (LXX), Heb 10:29

You are playing with fire.
 

JustMe

Well-Known Member
May 6, 2025
1,172
1,333
113
US
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Scripture teaches that God in His essence is invisible, and that the Father is revealed through the eternal Son, who is the image of the invisible God (John 1:18; Col 1:15).,
Can you point to the scripture where it says explicitly or by clear simple deduction there was a Son of God before he was born, who was and has always been 'eternal,' that went by the title name/designation, the Son of God, and who was revealed by his Father before he was born as the title, Son of God?

Thanks..
 
Last edited:

JustMe

Well-Known Member
May 6, 2025
1,172
1,333
113
US
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Can you point to the scripture where it says explicitly or by clear simple deduction there was a Son of God before he was born, who was and has always been 'eternal,' that went by the title name/designation, the Son of God, and who was revealed by his Father before he was born as the title, Son of God?

Thanks..
@Hazelelponi you might be busy and cannot get to my reply just yet. Well, let me add some more dialogue on my query to you concerning the use of Son of God over time, and why some say he's also dubbed the 'eternal Son.'

In scripture, ‘eternal’ or ‘everlasting’ refers to humans and angels living indefinitely under the Father's authority, contingent on continued faith. They remain subject to destruction if faith is lost; for example, Adam and fallen angels are already marked for permanent destruction, as is much of humanity. The term ‘eternal’ does not equal immortality, which implies irreversibility and independence from faith. Using ‘eternal’ rather than ‘immortal’ for the Son of God suggests a subordinate state, but applying either term to a being not equal to the Father presents a logical contradiction. Of course, there is history as to why this occurred. It just came to its illogical conclusion.

Let me know what you think, when you get to it. thanks again