What begins the great tribulation ? And What ends the great tribulation ?Yes, I am. I am not convinced by anything you say about any of this even a tiny bit. Our views couldn't possibly be further apart on this.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What begins the great tribulation ? And What ends the great tribulation ?Yes, I am. I am not convinced by anything you say about any of this even a tiny bit. Our views couldn't possibly be further apart on this.
Marty, Jesus did not come to earth to execute judgement at the time of the 70 AD attack on Jerusalem by the Romans. Jesus did not partake in the destruction of the temple and city.Yes and that happening here on earth was showing that Jesus was the son of man up in heaven. It was the sign of Jesus coming in judgement on apostate Israel who rejected Him and killed Him, they didn’t recognize who He was and that He came to them.
The great tribulation started the Steven was stoned to death and is still happening today.What begins the great tribulation ? And What ends the great tribulation ?
Marty, Jesus did not come to earth to execute judgement at the time of the 70 AD attack on Jerusalem by the Romans. Jesus did not partake in the destruction of the temple and city.
Had the Jews accepted Jesus as their King of Israel messiah, the 70 AD attack by the Romans would never had happened, because Jesus would have removed the Roman occupation of the land of Israel..
Marty,The great tribulation started the Steven was stoned to death and is still happening today.
If you're talking about what Jesus called "great tribulation" and "great distress in the land" in the Olivet Discourse, then what started it was the Roman armies surrounding Jerusalem and then attacking the people in the city while destroying the city itself including its temple buildings around 70 AD.What begins the great tribulation ? And What ends the great tribulation ?
What? NNOOooooooo......If you're talking about what Jesus called "great tribulation" and "great distress in the land" in the Olivet Discourse, then what started it was the Roman armies surrounding Jerusalem and then attacking the people in the city while destroying the city itself including its temple buildings around 70 AD.
Merry Christmas Doug.Hi Marilyn,
The kjv version for Zecharian 14:5 has "saints".
The bride of Christ in Revelation 19 are His saints, accompanying Jesus in Revelation 19:14, as His army of heaven, Revelation 19:19. Jesus coming with all his saints is also in 1Thessalonains3:13. And 1Thessalonians 2:19.
There will be holy angels of heaven that will also accompany Jesus. Likely to deal with Satan's angels that will have been cast down to earth in the middle part of the seven years. In Revelation 20:1-3, an angel from heaven will bind Satan in chains and cast Satan into the bottomless pit.
When you disagree with me, that only confirms even more that what I believe is true. You are wrong about everything.What? NNOOooooooo......
Uh huh. And Luke 21:20-24 is a parallel passage to Matthew 24:15-21. What is described there matches what happened in 70 AD in Jerusalem.In Matthew 24:15-21 is the great tribulation.
Yes, and, just as Jesus prophesied, believers fled to the mountains when they saw the Roman armies surrounding Jerusalem and avoided being killed or taken captive when the armies came in and destroyed the city and its temple buildings while killing many Jews and leading the rest into captivity to all nations.Jesus, in Matthew 24:15, referred to what Daniel wrote about the abomination of desolation Daniel 12:11-12.
No, you try again. You need to start from scratch because your current end times beliefs are all wrong.Try again.
Matthew 24:15-21 is end times, proved so by the preceding verse of Matthew 24:14.Uh huh. And Luke 21:20-24 is a parallel passage to Matthew 24:15-21. What is described there matches what happened in 70 AD in Jerusalem.
The preceding verse proves nothing. You are proving that you don't understand where Jesus answered the question about when the temple buildings would be destroyed. His answer to that question is found in Matthew 24:15-21. The parallel passage of Luke 21:20-24 describes things exactly as they happened in 70 AD.Matthew 24:15-21 is end times, proved so by the preceding verse of Matthew 24:14.
You have the wrong understanding of what "the time of the end" means. The prophecies in Daniel were unsealed during New Testament times. The New Testament shows us what those prophecies mean. The meaning of "the time of the end" is similar to the meaning of "the last days". According to scripture, the last days had begun already long ago. Peter related the things that were happening on the day of Pentecost to the last days (Acts 2:16-21) and he indicated that the last days would continue up until the future second coming of Christ (2 Peter 3:3-4). You just assume that "the time of the end" only refers to a short period of time, but you fail to consider that other terms like "the last days" cover the entire time period between the first and second coming of Christ.14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
The abomination of desolation of Daniel 12:11-12 is time of the end, not 70AD.
Daniel 12:
8 And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things?
9 And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.
No, you try again. You are wrong about almost everything, if not literally everything. You need to try again from scratch.Try again.
Yes, they asked him about the sign of his “parousia” (presence) not his “erchomai” (coming)....there is an important difference in the use of these two words, mistranslated like many others.Jesus and the disciples routinely over-nighted on the mount of Olives. That is where the disciples asked the question to Jesus about the sign of his coming.
No, Jesus was speaking about the same event......the last days of the Jewish system also pictured the last days of the present world system, about which Daniel wrote. In the time of the last ruing powers pictured by the toes of the image. (Dan 2:44)Why did they even ask that question... ?
It was because Jesus had already spoke about his second coming in Luke 21:27 while in the temple courtyard surrounded by an audience listening to him speak (Luke 20:45).
That is a new thought to me, but it does not agree with the rest of Scripture....So when the disciples and Jesus left the temple complex, they went to the mount of Olives, where the disciple inquired further to Jesus about his second coming, in Matthew 24:3.
Part of their inquiring was ""what shall be the sign of thy coming" ? "second" coming is implied because Jesus had already talked about it while in the temple courtyard speaking to the audience gathered around.
No, Matthew 24:14 transitions to the end times, after the gospel of the kingdom had been preached unto all nations.The preceding verse proves nothing. You are proving that you don't understand where Jesus answered the question about when the temple buildings would be destroyed. His answer to that question is found in Matthew 24:15-21.
I provided scripture of the angel telling John when and what the great tribulation is it’s different from the wrath of GodMarty,
The great tribulation will start when the abomination of desolation is set up on the temple mount.
Matthew 24:
15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand: )
16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:
17 Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house:
18 Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes.
19 And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!
20 But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day:
21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
Or perhaps you do.....what does the evidence show?You have the wrong understanding of what "the time of the end" means.
Here is where you veer off track. Daniel was told to “seal up” the book of his prophesies until the “time of the end” because nothing in them would make sense until then.....The prophecies in Daniel were unsealed during New Testament times. The New Testament shows us what those prophecies mean. The meaning of "the time of the end" is similar to the meaning of "the last days". According to scripture, the last days had begun already long ago.
The “last days” of the Jewish system were looming in Peter’s day, but according to the Revelation given to John, it was the eviction of Satan and his demons from heaven that also signalled the beginning of the last days.Peter related the things that were happening on the day of Pentecost to the last days (Acts 2:16-21) and he indicated that the last days would continue up until the future second coming of Christ (2 Peter 3:3-4). You just assume that "the time of the end" only refers to a short period of time, but you fail to consider that other terms like "the last days" cover the entire time period between the first and second coming of Christ.
The evidence shows what I said. I certainly won't ever accept correction from a Jehovah's Witness. You need to come out of the Jehovah's Witnesses cult so that you can discover the truth.Or perhaps you do.....what does the evidence show?
You veered off track as soon as you joined the Jehovah's Witnesses cult. I don't need you to try to tell me I've veered off track when I know that you know nothing.Here is where you veer off track.
Sense is made of the Old Testament prophecies, including Daniel's, in the New Testament. Do you think that the gospel authors and the NT authors like Paul an Peter didn't understand Daniel's prophecies despite being filled with the Holy Spirit and being inspired by the Holy Spirit to write the New Testament? Again, I believe "the time of the end" corresponds with "the last days" and scripture indicates that the last days cover the time period between the first and second coming of Christ (the New Testament time period).Daniel was told to “seal up” the book of his prophesies until the “time of the end” because nothing in them would make sense until then.....
Marty, I think you copied and pasted from Revelation 7:9-17, correct ? The great multitude that John saw in heaven before the throne of God, and before the Lamb.I provided scripture of the angel telling John when and what the great tribulation is it’s different from the wrath of God
Here is an example of how you manipulate the text to fit your doctrine.The great tribulation will be a unmatched time of difficulty. And if not limited in length, no flesh on earth will survive.
No, the great tribulation will be global.The context of this "great tribulation" is that it would occur in Judea, not in the whole world. So, to say that if it's duration wasn't limited, no flesh on earth will survive is a case of taking His words completely out of context. The context is that no flesh in Judea would survive if the time wasn't shortened, not that no flesh on earth would survive.

Them in Judaea fled prior to 70 AD when they saw Jerusalem compassed with armies (Luke 21:20).No, the great tribulation will be global.
The reason them in Judea, the region in Israel encompassing Jerusalem, are warned to flee to the mountains right away when they see the AoD set up on the temple mount is - because the false prophet is going to start rounding people up in the area and bringing them to the temple mount to worship the statue image - or be executed if refusing to do so.
Look at this verse in Revelation 20...
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
View attachment 76420