A recent session I had with Chatgpt pertaining to some of the Discourse

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,707
951
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Of course the People of God spiritually discern, and are spiritually discerned.

LOL!!!!

Here comes the "BUT"":
But the AOD spoken of by Daniel (Daniel 9:26,27) and Jesus, is corroborated and identified in the Matthew 24:15 parallel synoptic verse of Luke 21:20:

"And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh."

The AOD was the Roman armies compassing the holy city of Jerusalem.

Matthew 24:15, Daniel 9:26,27, and Luke 21:20 constitute a three-way corroboration.

Falsehood! :laughing:

Mat 24:15
(15) When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)

This verse requires spiritual discernment: what city, what temple, what abomination, and what army is actually being spoken of. You cannot understand this from a secular historian—especially one who is not even Christian.

You are completely wrong: wrong Jerusalem, wrong army, and wrong period of time. The Olivet Discourse is not a history book as your natural mind thinks (clearly not spiritual discerned); it is prophecy and spiritual instruction for the Church prior to the Second Coming. Your attempt to tie it to Roman armies in A.D. 70 is a misapplication of Scripture.

Enough said.
 

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
7,773
3,438
113
75
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Well duh! It is YOU who are confused.

You’ve already admitted the truth: the Temple of God is people, not physical stones. Under the Old Covenant, the people themselves pointed to Christ, who is the true Temple. They were meant to be the builders, but they rejected the Cornerstone and in doing so brought judgment upon themselves. In trying to destroy Christ—the true Temple, the true City, and the true Sanctuary—they fulfilled God’s plan. In three days, Christ rebuilt the Temple, this time as His New Covenant people. All of this happened at the Cross. The physical temple and city in A.D. 70 were never required to prove the end of the Old Covenant as so-called "physical signs" to satisfy your false doctrine.

Scripture is unambiguous.

1Co 3:16
(16) Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?

Eph 2:21-22
(21) In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
(22) In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

1Pe 2:5
(5) Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.

If the Temple is spiritual and indwelling, then no physical building needed to be destroyed to mark the end of the Old Covenant. Scripture already tells us when the Old Covenant ended as you should already agreed with:

Heb 10:9
(9) Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.

Col 2:14
(14) Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;

The Old Covenant ended at the Cross, not in A.D. 70.

Moreover, believers became Christians, received the Spirit, and were called God’s Temple while the physical temple was still standing (Acts 2; Acts 7; Acts 21). That alone destroys the claim that A.D. 70 was “required” to prove anything covenantally. :rolleyes:

Jesus Himself tied true worship away from physical structures:

John 4:21-24
(21) Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.
(22) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.
(23) But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.
(24) God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

So you can’t have it both ways.

If the Kingdom is within (Luke 17:21) and the Temple is the People, then insisting on a necessary physical destruction in A.D. 70 is not biblical—it’s theological baggage only for the fools.

The Old Covenant died when Christ died, especially the first two verses of Olivet Discourse. But for the rest of the chapter, you are Christ’s Words through the wrong temple, wrong congregation, wrong army, wrong land, etc. because they are a type of the New Testament Congregation which "IS" a holy place on this side of the Cross ever since the Old Covenant ends. If anyone have spiritual ears, let him hear!
Awaiting your response to my post 145. :laughing:
 

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
7,773
3,438
113
75
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
LOL!!!!

Here comes the "BUT"":


Falsehood! :laughing:

Mat 24:15
(15) When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)

This verse requires spiritual discernment: what city, what temple, what abomination, and what army is actually being spoken of. You cannot understand this from a secular historian—especially one who is not even Christian.

You are completely wrong: wrong Jerusalem, wrong army, and wrong period of time. The Olivet Discourse is not a history book as your natural mind thinks (clearly not spiritual discerned); it is prophecy and spiritual instruction for the Church prior to the Second Coming. Your attempt to tie it to Roman armies in A.D. 70 is a misapplication of Scripture.

Enough said.
Yes, Daniel was "a secular historian who is not even Christian".

Keep that "discernment" coming. :laughing:
 

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,707
951
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Yes, Daniel was "a secular historian who is not even Christian".

Keep that "discernment" coming. :laughing:

Still making empty sarcastic remarks?

And you are wrong.

Daniel was “saved by faith,” even before Christ’s earthly coming, because salvation has always been by faith in God. Romans 4:3 says, “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness.” The same principle applies to Daniel: he trusted God wholeheartedly, obeyed His commands, and depended on God for deliverance—so in that sense, he was saved by faith just like Christians are today, even though he didn’t know Jesus personally.

So, while Daniel was a Jew under the Old Covenant historically, spiritually he is considered part of the same “faith family” as Christians because faith in CHRIST, not law-keeping, was the basis of his righteousness.

And no he didn’t prophesied physical destruction of 70AD. You don’t even know what abomination of desolation is spoke of Daniel the prophet anyway.

Grow up, fool and you have been placed on ignore list.
 

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,722
2,482
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It stopped being the holy place when the veil of the temple was torn in two when Jesus died on the cross.

Christ declared the holy place of Old to be desolate before He went to the cross. When He said "Behold, your house if left unto desolate"!

Luke 13:31-35 (KJV) The same day there came certain of the Pharisees, saying unto him, Get thee out, and depart hence: for Herod will kill thee. And he said unto them, Go ye, and tell that fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and I do cures to day and to morrow, and the third day I shall be perfected. Nevertheless I must walk to day, and to morrow, and the day following: for it cannot be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem. O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.
 

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,722
2,482
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Matthew 27:53
And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

It was referred to as the holy city even after Jesus' resurrection.

This is an excellent verse! Where is the holy city they appeared unto many in after the resurrection of Christ? If it were the holy city of Old they would have been resurrected physically, but there is no verse of Scripture to prove these saints came out of the grave in physical bodies. Because none shall be bodily resurrected from the graves before an hour that is coming when the last trumpet sounds and time shall be no longer.

John 5:28-29 (KJV) Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

See Jo 6:39,49,44,54. 1 Corinthians 15:51-52 (KJV) Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

The only holy city the bodies of the saints of Old arose to after the resurrection of Christ is heavenly Jerusalem, the city of the living God. They came out of the graves and as spiritual body, a living soul they ascended with the spirit of Christ (Lu 23:46) because before ascending to heaven, Christ first descended into the lower parts of the earth, (Eph 4:8-10) the place of the dead of Old, called Abraham's bosom, and emptying the graves took them with Him to heaven. Because believers are both natural body of flesh, raised a spiritual body after physical death. "There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body." Who in heaven did the spiritual body of Christ, living souls appear to in heaven. An innumerable multitude of angels as well as the whole hosts of heaven.

Matthew 27:52-53 (KJV) And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

Revelation 21:2 (KJV) And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

Hebrews 12:22-24 (KJV)
But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels, To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect, And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.

1 Corinthians 15:44 (KJV) It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
 

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,722
2,482
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If not Jerusalem, what and where do you think that it was?


Nothing required that.

Heavenly Jerusalem! The city of the living God. Since the advent of Christ Paul tells us when we are absent from the body, we are present with the Lord! After His resurrection Christ was seen ascending in immortal/incorruptible flesh up into heaven. Because flesh and blood shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.

2 Corinthians 5:8 (KJV) We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord.

Acts 1:9-11 (KJV)
And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight. And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel; Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.

1 Corinthians 15:49-50 (KJV) And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly. Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.

In what body were they resurrected and seen in Jerusalem of Old, since the physical mortal body at death returns to the dust of the earth? Our mortal body shall not be resurrected again before the hour coming when the last trumpet sounds.

Genesis 3:19 (KJV) In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.

Only the spirit of man returns to God, while our mortal body of flesh returns to dust. That's how we know, since the advent of Christ the mortal body returns to dust, and we, as spiritual body of Christ, living souls return to God in heaven.

Ecclesiastes 12:7 (KJV) Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.
 

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
7,773
3,438
113
75
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Heavenly Jerusalem! The city of the living God. Since the advent of Christ Paul tells us when we are absent from the body, we are present with the Lord! After His resurrection Christ was seen ascending in immortal/incorruptible flesh up into heaven. Because flesh and blood shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.

2 Corinthians 5:8 (KJV) We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord.

Acts 1:9-11 (KJV)
And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight. And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel; Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.

1 Corinthians 15:49-50 (KJV) And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly. Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.

In what body were they resurrected and seen in Jerusalem of Old, since the physical mortal body at death returns to the dust of the earth? Our mortal body shall not be resurrected again before the hour coming when the last trumpet sounds.

Genesis 3:19 (KJV) In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.

Only the spirit of man returns to God, while our mortal body of flesh returns to dust. That's how we know, since the advent of Christ the mortal body returns to dust, and we, as spiritual body of Christ, living souls return to God in heaven.

Ecclesiastes 12:7 (KJV) Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.
Matthew 27
52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

They were physical appearances.
 

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,707
951
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This is an excellent verse!

God's Word is excellent but he lacks spiritual understanding.

I don't deny that many indeed saw the body of saints, as we cannot deny scripture. I absolutely believe that the body of saints appeared unto many, just as the word of God reports. But, get this, this miracle performed by God, like every other miracle done by God directly or through the Prophets, Christ and the Apostles, were simply a sign pointing to some "deeper" spiritual truth. Note God's word says the graves were opened and "the body of saints" arose, not the souls. God's Word is not incidental or by happenstance, it is every jot and title God breathed. Because the physical body is the only thing that was down in the grave. Selah! This is a miracle of God in reconstituting the bodies of the saints, that they appeared unto many as a "sign!"

Matthew 27:50-53
  • "Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
    And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
  • And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
  • And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many."
The tearing of the physical veil of the physical Temple building was a sign signifying the end of the Old Covenant and the beginning of the New Covenant in the resurrection of Christ. The body of Moses resurrected not by law, but by a New and Living way, that is through the veil, which is Christ's flesh (Hebrews 10:20). Thus, the Instant we read here that Christ died, the veil was torn from top to bottom and many people see this miracle of graves opening and bodies resurrected. These are not the glorified bodies of the saints, as glorified bodies do not appear as normal human bodies. This was obviously done as another sign that Christ was the resurrection and the Life, just as when He raised Lazarus. Therefore, this is not a confirmation that the physical city, Jerusalem, at the cross or in 70AD was holy as a fool thought.

What we really are clearly told here, is that the bodies "of" the saints came out of the grave after His resurrection, and appeared unto many. Not the souls of the saints, or the saints themselves, but the bodies of the saints. These "bodies" [soma] came out of the grave after His resurrection and went into the Holy city and appeared unto many as a sign. By the normal use of grammatical expression, we would understand bodies coming out of the grave (on earth) and appearing unto many, as referring to things happening on earth. It doesn't say nor imply that dead bodies went into heaven and appeared unto Spirits, Angels or to God in Heaven. There is no reason to "read into this text" that they went into heaven and appeared unto many spirits there, but ample reason that they should appear unto men on earth as a sign, and those men TESTIFIED of this.

And there was NOTHING holy about the earthly Jerusalem after the resurrection, including 70AD. Nevertheless, it was still called the Holy City (Matthew 4:5).

Mat 4:5-6
(5) Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple,
(6) And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.

Even as it is to this day. And for "God's purposes" it was called that here. And that is how the testimony of Jerusalem would be recorded that we understand the deeper spiritual meaning of bodies rising out of the grave after Christ's resurrection and going into it. Since Jerusalem is "called" the Holy City. The Building is "called" the Holy Temple. The nation "called Israel, the Holy nation. This is done in Scripture specifically because God is "signifying" by this, the deeper Spiritual truth. Namely, the resurrection of the saints from "Spiritual death" unto New Jerusalem, manifested in this bodily resurrection from physical death and these bodies going into earthly Jerusalem.

Vis-à-vis, think about this carefully, the resurrection of Lazarus spiritually, is manifested to us in the resurrection of Lazarus physically. The healing of people spiritually, is manifested to us by the healing of people physically. The Poisoning of men spiritually, is manifested to us by the poisoning of men physically. The feeding of the hungry spiritually, is manifested to us by the feeding of the hungry physically. The list of such miraculous phenomenon goes on and on. And the point of "ALL" of them is some spiritual truth that transcends these physical miracles on Earth. Selah!

So even as physical healing really has nothing to do with true salvation, so corpses leaving the grave and appearing to many in the Holy City of Jerusalem, has nothing to do with spiritual resurrection. But it is a "picture" or snapshot of this true Resurrection for all to consider. And that's why it's in the Bible. The same reason the Bible tells you to lay hands on the sick, and they will recover.

Acts 21:28
  • "Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place."
Yes, there is nothing Holy about this place, but it's still "called" the holy place by men. And indeed, God could have reduced Jerusalem to a speck of dust, never to be heard from again. But He didn't. That men still know this city as the Holy City, and the temple built there as the Holy place, even though it is no longer standing even to this day, is a testimony to God, not to them. He named it the Holy City, and He had the dead come out of the graves and enter into it. Not as a testimony to it's holiness or to them, but to the Resurrection. Selah.
 
Last edited:

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,722
2,482
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Matthew 27
52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

They were physical appearances.

Ok Covenantee, I feel we've come to an impasse. Thanks for taking the time to respond to my replies, I hope you will give further thought and consideration to what we have discussed. Many blessings rwb
 

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
7,773
3,438
113
75
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Ok Covenantee, I feel we've come to an impasse. Thanks for taking the time to respond to my replies, I hope you will give further thought and consideration to what we have discussed. Many blessings rwb
OK rwb blessings to you as well.
 

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,722
2,482
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I don't deny that many indeed saw the body of saints, as we cannot deny scripture. I absolutely believe that the body of saints appeared unto many, just as the word of God reports.

Yes, this is a very common teaching among Christians. Trouble is you cannot prove through the Scripture what you believe. If you've read what I've already responded to covenantee you will find that my belief is built upon an abundance of Scripture.
Note God's word says the graves were opened and "the body of saints" arose, not the souls.

This doesn't help your argument. Because Scripture affirms that when our body dies believers are raised (quickened) a spiritual body that is a living soul that is as are the angels of God in heaven, spirits without physical form. That's how John was given to see disembodied living souls in heaven after they physically died in faith.

Graves being opened metaphorically speaking means these dead saints came into remembrance by God, because the dead in faith are never from the remembrance of God as the dead in unbelief are. The names of all the saints are written in the book of remembrance that is the Lamb's Book of Life from the foundation of the world.

Strong's Greek Dictionary
3419. μνημεῖον mnemeion (mnēmeîon)

Search for G3419 in KJVSL; in KJV; load in ESI.

μνημεῖον mnēmeîon, mnay-mi'-on

from G3420; a remembrance, i.e. cenotaph (place of interment):—grave, sepulchre, tomb.

neuter noun

Strong's Greek Dictionary
3420. μνήμη mneme (mnḗmē)

Search for G3420 in KJVSL; in KJV; load in ESI.

μνήμη mnḗmē, mnay'-may

from G3403; memory:—remembrance.

feminine noun

Romans 8:36-39 (KJV) As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us. For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

The tearing of the physical veil of the physical Temple building was a sign signifying the end of the Old Covenant and the beginning of the New Covenant in the resurrection of Christ.

I believe the Old Covenant was finished when Christ came with the Kingdom of God to establish the New Covenant that would be made complete through Hid crucifixion.
By the normal use of grammatical expression, we would understand bodies coming out of the grave (on earth) and appearing unto many, as referring to things happening on earth.

Where is your witness? It's a pretty big deal when one is raised physically from the dead. Look what transpired through the resurrection of one man, Lazarus for example. Yet we find nothing in Scripture nor to my knowledge historical writings of "many saints" being mortally resurrected from the graves. Notice it does not say these many saints were resurrected to mortal life again. It says only that "bodies" of saints arose.

There is no reason to "read into this text" that they went into heaven and appeared unto many spirits there, but ample reason that they should appear unto men on earth as a sign, and those men TESTIFIED of this.

I read nothing into this text! Rather I used Scripture to interpret Scripture in a manner that does not cause contradiction, as being physically resurrected would, nor did I introduce inconsistency into the texts as a physical resurrection before the hour coming when the last trumpet sounds would.

And there was NOTHING holy about the earthly Jerusalem after the resurrection, including 70AD. Nevertheless, it was still called the Holy City (Matthew 4:5).

Mat 4:5-6
(5) Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple,
(6) And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.

The devil calling it the holy city does not make it holy anymore than when Pharisees call the city holy. Remember the devil was seeking to tempt Jesus. Luke doesn't say "holy city" he simply says "Jerusalem".

Luke 4:9 (KJV) And he brought him to Jerusalem, and set him on a pinnacle of the temple, and said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down from hence:
Luke 4:10-11 (KJV) For it is written, He shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee: And in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.

Yes, there is nothing Holy about this place, but it's still "called" the holy place by men.

It should not be called 'holy' by the faithful body of Christ. For Christ, and believers since the advent of Christ are the only representative of the holy place on earth called Church.
 

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,707
951
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Where is your witness?

Wait.

I think we know "why bodies" came out of the grave and went into the Holy City, since it was a spiritual picture or figure of the resurrection. Not the actual resurrection itself, as that would mean all the Old Covenant saints would have been raised up. Obviously, it wasn't the actual resurrection! The saints that once possessed those bodies were already absent from them, and present with the Lord. So these bodies could only go to the physical city as a SIGN, and for one very specific Godly purpose. "To Appear Unto Many" that the testimony of witnesses might be found on the pages of Holy canon.

Selah!

Matthew 27:51-54
  • "And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
  • And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
  • And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.
  • Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God."
You seem dead set on completely "ignoring" and/or casting aside the very plain context of this whole episode, as well as the statement that the Centurion and others SAW all those things that were done with their eyes. That is a witness. Was the Centurion in heaven to fear when the bodies came out of the grave and went into the Holy City? No. We simply cannot ignore the very plain context of this taking place on earth. I mean we can, but it is not Biblically justifiable.

It's a pretty big deal when one is raised physically from the dead. Look what transpired through the resurrection of one man, Lazarus for example. Yet we find nothing in Scripture nor to my knowledge historical writings of "many saints" being mortally resurrected from the graves. Notice it does not say these many saints were resurrected to mortal life again. It says only that "bodies" of saints arose.

Where did I ever write that the bodies of the saints were “mortally resurrected” from the graves? Show me the quote. You have completely misunderstood my position.

There was no soul or spirit of the saints inhabiting those bodies. They were not restored to mortal life. The bodies functioned as shells—appearing in the holy city and being seen by many as a sign.

What became of those bodies afterward is immaterial and beside the point. Scripture does not focus on that, and neither do I. The point is this: they appeared to many in the holy city as a divine sign, pointing to something far greater.

No, they did not return to mortal life, as you assumed I was teaching. That claim is entirely your misrepresentation of my words.

Selah.
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
12,819
4,033
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Matthew and Mark recorded Jesus as talking about things in relation to the destruction of the temple in 70 AD, unlike @Davidpt. He thinks that, for some inexplicable reason, Matthew and Mark didn't record anything Jesus said about the destruction of the temple and only Luke did.
No they didn't

As you've been shown several times the temple to be destroyed was the Lord's body, not one word in Matthew Chapter 24 saw 70AD fulfillment

I Strongly Disagree, the temple to be destroyed was his body just as the scripture teaches

Matthew Chapter 24 had absolutely no fulfillment in 70AD

John 2:19-22KJV
19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
21 But he spake of the temple of his body.
22 When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said.
 

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
7,773
3,438
113
75
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
No they didn't

As you've been shown several times the temple to be destroyed was the Lord's body, not one word in Matthew Chapter 24 saw 70AD fulfillment

I Strongly Disagree, the temple to be destroyed was his body just as the scripture teaches

Matthew Chapter 24 had absolutely no fulfillment in 70AD

John 2:19-22KJV
19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
21 But he spake of the temple of his body.
22 When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said.
Did John 2:19-22 take place in the Olivet discourse?
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
12,819
4,033
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Did John 2:19-22 take place in the Olivet discourse?
Did Jesus stand before the temple made of stone in Jerusalem and state "Destroy This Temple"?

Was Jesus talking about the temple of his body being destroyed?
 

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
7,773
3,438
113
75
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Did Jesus stand before the temple made of stone in Jerusalem and state "Destroy This Temple"?

Was Jesus talking about the temple of his body being destroyed?
I asked the question first.

Answer mine first, then I'll answer yours.