Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Acts 28 is wrong I am mid actsFor everyone reading, let me cut through the fog and call this what it is. What @Doug is pushing is not new light. It is an old system commonly known as hyper-dispensationalism or Acts 28 theology
sadly many live by the faith of another and that which be of men .The 'Death' of the serpent on the Cross represents CHRIST defeating Satan on the Cross thru HIS Own Sacrafice.
One Cross for One Gospel for One Salvation = "to the Jew first and also to the Gentile"
Romans 1:16-17
For I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God to salvation for everyone who believes,
for the Jew first and also for the Greek.
For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, “The just shall live by faith.”
The gospel has already been stated, plainly, from Scripture. Christ died for sins, was buried, and rose again. Salvation is by grace through faith in Him. One cross. One gospel ~1 Corinthians 15:3–4; ~Ephesians 2:8–9. That answer has not been avoided.Please what is the one gospel?
Moving the line does not fix the error. Call it Acts 28 or mid-Acts, it is the same move. You are still pushing a delayed Body of Christ, still slicing believers into stages Scripture never names, and still implying truth was withheld and later unlocked. Shifting the start date a few chapters earlier does not make it biblical.Acts 28 is wrong I am mid acts
just like they twist the doctri ne of paul by their own paulineMoving the line does not fix the error. Call it Acts 28 or mid-Acts, it is the same move. You are still pushing a delayed Body of Christ, still slicing believers into stages Scripture never names, and still implying truth was withheld and later unlocked. Shifting the start date a few chapters earlier does not make it biblical.
The Bible never says the church began mid-Acts. Luke calls it the church early and without apology ~Acts 5:11; ~Acts 9:31. Paul says he persecuted the church of God, singular ~1 Corinthians 15:9. He says Gentiles are added to the same body ~Ephesians 3:6. He says there is one body ~Ephesians 4:4. Scripture never pauses the church, reboots it, or runs two bodies side by side.
This is not new light. It is old division with a relocated starting line. “Is Christ divided?” ~1 Corinthians 1:13. One gospel. One body. One Lord. The Word of God is plain.
I was asking David but since you answered I am confused as to what you believeThe gospel has already been stated, plainly, from Scripture. Christ died for sins, was buried, and rose again. Salvation is by grace through faith in Him. One cross. One gospel ~1 Corinthians 15:3–4; ~Ephesians 2:8–9. That answer has not been avoided.
Just so you know Acts 28 says Paul only received the mystery while in prison and are only in the prison epistles. This negates prior epistles that spoke of the mystery and the body of Christ.Call it Acts 28 or mid-Acts, it is the same move
@bdavidc and @amigo de christo and myself are here for you = we are working together to help you.I was asking David but since you answered I am confused as to what you believe
In post #13 you cited John 3:16 and the gospel of the kingdom but here the death and resurrection
Do you think all of it is the gospel?
I still dont know what gospel you believe, please tell me@bdavidc and @amigo de christo and myself are here for you = we are working together to help you.
You are reading into those texts. They do not implicitly or explicitly support your assertions.[John 10:16 KJV] "And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, [and] one shepherd."
[John 11:51 KJV] "And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation;"
[John 11:52 KJV] "And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad."
This doesn’t support your assertion either. You’re making a distinction where Jesus doesn’t. The only basis of the distinction between sheep and goats is how followers of Christ were treated, and, I would argue, by extension even the unbelieving poor and vulnerable. You’re reading into the context that sheep only refers to Jews, but the entire biblical context refutes that idea—a sheep is a follower of God and, more specifically in the NT, a follower of Christ.[Matthew 25:32 KJV] "And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth [his] sheep from the goats:"
[Matthew 25:33 KJV] "And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left."
[Matthew 25:34 KJV] "Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:"............the sheep on his right hand are the Gentiles that will inherit the kingdom based on how they treated Israel...........[Matthew 25:40 KJV] "And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done [it] unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done [it] unto me."
yes indeed there be only one true gospelYou are reading into those texts. They do not implicitly or explicitly support your assertions.
The church began largely as Jews but also Jewish converts, meaning they were ethnic Gentiles. Then the gospel was sent out to Gentile nations and they were grafted in. There has always been one gospel for one church that is made up of all Jewish and Gentile sheep.
This doesn’t support your assertion either. You’re making a distinction where Jesus doesn’t. The only basis of the distinction between sheep and goats is how followers of Christ were treated, and, I would argue, by extension even the unbelieving poor and vulnerable. You’re reading into the context that sheep only refers to Jews, but the entire biblical context refutes that idea—a sheep is a follower of God and, more specifically in the NT, a follower of Christ.
Rev. 20:11-15 is also relevant context.
= get every man woman and c hild out of anything ecumeincal and now .@bdavidc and @amigo de christo and myself are here for you = we are working together to help you.
Doug, it's not that hard. The Bible has already spoken, and this has been answered.I was asking David but since you answered I am confused as to what you believe
In post #13 you cited John 3:16 and the gospel of the kingdom but here the death and resurrection
Do you think all of it is the gospel?
And just so you know: Acts 28 nowhere says Paul only received the mystery while in prison. Scripture clearly says otherwise.Just so you know Acts 28 says Paul only received the mystery while in prison and are only in the prison epistles. This negates prior epistles that spoke of the mystery and the body of Christ.
its not the scripture its your interpretation i am disagreeing with.. there are no such thing as 2 separate Churches one foundation built upon the rock ( THE lord Jesus Christ ) ONE Lord ONE Faith ONE baptism ONE BODY OF CHRIST AKA Ekalesia THAT HAS MANY MEMBERS . i realize your of the Pauline movement . all your scripture interpretation has been countered by other scripture that does not agree with you. for the record i have considered i am willing to look at most any teaching .. but i am not so open minded .. that i jump on board of just any 14 That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;. i am not accusing you of depiction.I am willing to discuss anytjing with you
I would just wish for you to consider that what I say is supported by scripture or ask me for scripture to validate it
judgment goats are not of Godsheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left."
Doug,I was asking David but since you answered I am confused as to what you believe
In post #13 you cited John 3:16 and the gospel of the kingdom but here the death and resurrection
Do you think all of it is the gospel?
I would take the position that it doesn't matter. We're not saved by believing some theological proposition about Jesus Christ; we're saved because we trust the Person of Jesus Christ.I dont remember, did I ever ask you to tell me the gospel you believe?
If so please tell me again I dont remember
Apparently to your 'shortsightedness', you do see 'twain' even scripturally that there're 2 churches to you, therefore 'twain' body of Christ.I contend that Acts 15 revels that there was indeed two churches. There was the little flock Jerusalem church and the body of Christ that, for a time, existed together.
[Acts 11:19 KJV] "Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice, and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews only.".........No Gentiles were being preached to. We have to be careful in assuming which church is being referred to in Galatians 2 and Acts 15. There were churches in Antioch before Paul was saved. Paul persecuted the little flock Jerusalem church and they were scattered as far as Antioch. These churches were not body of Christ churches, they were the little flock Jerusalem churches.
[Acts 15:1 KJV] "And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, [and said], Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.".........If they came down from Judea, chances are these men who said the Gentile believers had to be circumcised were not from the body of Christ, but from the little flock church (I will explain). ........ [Acts 15:2 KJV] "When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question.".........Paul and Barnabas disputed with the men from Judea, not with the body of Christ members. It was decided that Paul and Barnabas and some of "them" from Judea should go to Jerusalem about this matter. If Paul was going to the apostles and elders, these apostles and elders were from the little flock Jerusalem church.
Paul could not have been disputing about matters within his ministry, but was dealing with stipulations being imposed on Gentile believers by some of the believing circumcision little flock..........[Galatians 1:22 KJV] "And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judaea which were in Christ:".........Paul says the churches of Judea were in Christ; the Jews in the little flock who believed on the name of Christ were in Christ, not just those in the body of Christ. ........Paul was unknown to the churches of Judea who only knew he persecuted them. That is why I said that those who came down from Judea weren't in the body of Christ, the churches of Judea didn't know Paul..........[Galatians 1:23 KJV] "But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.".......It is very doubtful that those from Judea were in the body of Christ.
[Acts 15:22 KJV] "Then pleased it the apostles and elders, with the whole church, to send chosen men of their own company to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas; [namely], Judas surnamed Barsabas, and Silas, chief men among the brethren:".........When James says they would send men from their OWN company that precludes them from being members of the body of Christ. The apostle and elders sent chosen men of their own company which is those of the little flock, NOT of the body of Christ along with Paul and Barnabas. This wasn't done by Paul alone.
[Acts 15:23 KJV] "And they wrote [letters] by them after this manner; The apostles and elders and brethren [send] greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia:"
[Acts 15:24 KJV] "Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, [Ye must] be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no [such] commandment:".......It is certain that those who said the Gentiles had to keep the law of Moses were from the little flock churches and not the body of Christ members. The apostles and elders of the little flock did not command anybody to go to the Gentiles and say they had to keep the law.
[Acts 15:25 KJV] "It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul,"........They sent believing little flock members WITH Paul and Barnabas. There was the little flock and the body of Christ in view here.
No doubt there were two churches here and saying there was just one church is incorrect.
The little flock church are those who believed the preaching of Jesus and the twelve. They believed only on the name of Jesus, that he was Christ, the Son of God, and had life by his name. They were persecuted and scattered under Paul. They were still in existence during the conversion and some of the ministry of Paul. The elders and apostles from the little flock church met with Paul in the Jerusalem council in Acts 15. The dispute arose from the little flock saying that Gentiles would have to follow the law of Moses. The little flock were the ones who disputed with Paul. This question would have impacted Paul and the church who were preaching liberty in Christ and that Gentiles weren't under the law.