Nonsense.He also teaches a Cross Denying Gospel...
Without the cross, the death penalty for all of humankind wouldn't be paid in full.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Nonsense.He also teaches a Cross Denying Gospel...
Well said.The original post had 4 statements and a question, “What is wrong with this picture?”
If you concur with the 4 statements, then the answer might could be, “There is nothing wrong!” perhaps followed by a statement concerning the infallibility of the God’s word.
If there is something wrong with the phrasing of the statements, please enlighten me how (I admit to having trouble understanding broad statements).
That's a very limited reading of the text.The Plan?
- Create humankind in your own image.
- Give them free-will to choose.
- Pay their sin debt.
- Send them to Hell for not accepting a free gift.
What's wrong with this picture?
[
I see. Since it disagrees with what you believe,That's a very limited reading of the text.
The error is in your understanding, not scripture.
What is wrong is that you don't seem to understand the nature of God--his holiness and justice--nor the nature of sin and just how sinful sin is.The Plan?
- Create humankind in your own image.
- Give them free-will to choose.
- Pay their sin debt.
- Send them to Hell for not accepting a free gift.
What's wrong with this picture?
[
Welcome to the forum.What is wrong is that you don't seem to understand the nature of God--his holiness and justice--nor the nature of sin and just how sinful sin is.
Your response shows that you don't understand the nature of sin and just how sinful sin is in comparison to God's holiness.Yes, I suppose sin is quite sinful. - LOL
To say that 'His "wrath"' is 'unhinged fury,' is a strawman that shows you don't understand the nature of God. God is perfectly just, which means that he must punish all who have sinned and rebelled against him. His wrath is that punishment. You essentially want an unjust God, but that wouldn't be God at all; certainly not a good God.You are providing the standard apologetic to whitewash what the church has taught us about God.
Somehow His "wrath" (unhinged fury) outweighs His mercy.
Yes. If you don't think it's a perfect plan or even a good one, what do you suggest would be?Was this God's perfect plan for humankind?
- Create humankind in your own image.
- Give them free-will to choose.
- Pay their sin debt.
- Send them to Hell for not accepting a free gift.
No, not exactly. You have no idea what I believe, and no interest in finding out. That's not why you're here. You have a narrative, an agenda, and more than likely some pathological need to bring everyone over to your way of thinking. What you don't have, is the same merciful and loving Spirit that you claim would prevent God from damning certain souls to hell. Its a bit ironic.I see. Since it disagrees with what you believe,
it can't possibly mean what it plainly says?
How about this?Yes. If you don't think it's a perfect plan or even a good one, what do you suggest would be?
No.You essentially want an unjust God, but that wouldn't be God at all; certainly not a good God.
First, your point "In the end each one is responsible for their actions" is precisely why people end up in hell. Second, where is the justice in your last point, that "Judgement (evaluation) leads to restoration and redemption."St. SteVen said:
Was this God's perfect plan for humankind?
- Create humankind in your own image.
- Give them free-will to choose.
- Pay their sin debt.
- Send them to Hell for not accepting a free gift.
How about this?
God's perfect plan for humankind?
- Create humankind in your own image.
- Give them free-will to choose.
- Pay their sin debt.
- In the end each one is responsible for their actions.
- Judgement (evaluation) leads to restoration and redemption.
He is in the redemption business; that is precisely what Jesus's death and resurrection accomplished. And, in the end, people will receive justice based on their actions.No.
I want a God who is in the redemption business, not the punishment business.
Pour out his wrath, as he repeatedly states he will do. Do you think he should just "love them" and let them go unpunished? That isn't actually loving at all.Jesus taught us that loving our enemies is godly behavior.
What should He do with His own enemies?
What is justice except the human desire for revenge. (a sin)You seem to want all mercy and love without justice, but that isn't loving.
You should rethink these statements in light of what God himself says:What is justice except the human desire for revenge. (a sin)
Forgiveness is a virtue. Mercy is an acceptable form of justice.
It doesn't have to mean without accountability.
I think these support my view better than yours.You should rethink these statements in light of what God himself says:
Deu 10:18 He executes justice for the fatherless and the widow, and loves the sojourner, giving him food and clothing
Deu 32:4 “The Rock, his work is perfect, for all his ways are justice. A God of faithfulness and without iniquity, just and upright is he.
Job 34:12 Of a truth, God will not do wickedly, and the Almighty will not pervert justice.
Psa 9:7 But the LORD sits enthroned forever; he has established his throne for justice,
Psa 33:5 He loves righteousness and justice; the earth is full of the steadfast love of the LORD.
Psa 37:28 For the LORD loves justice; he will not forsake his saints. They are preserved forever, but the children of the wicked shall be cut off.
Psa 89:14 Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne; steadfast love and faithfulness go before you.
Psa 97:2 Clouds and thick darkness are all around him; righteousness and justice are the foundation of his throne.
Pardon: we are interrupting the dialog in progress for an aside—separate discussion of “What is Justice?”What is justice except the human desire for revenge. (a sin)
Forgiveness is a virtue. Mercy is an acceptable form of justice.
It doesn't have to mean without accountability.
Thanks.Corrective justice: basically, redressing wrongs, making amends for damages.
Retributive justice: assigning the offender punitive damages proportional to the crime. As opposed to revenge, retribution is not personal, but is directed only at wrongdoing.
My view is that God will carry out corrective justice. He has no need for retribution.We agree personal revenge is forbidden by God, whereas retributive justice is reserved for tribes, communities, societies, . . . (see Matthew 18: 15-17; also 1 Corinthians 5).
So: can we say God carries out retributive justice on each of us upon death?
How so? Again, you stated: "What is justice except the human desire for revenge. (a sin)". But that makes God a sinner because "he has established his throne for justice," "He loves righteousness and justice," and "righteousness and justice are the foundation of his throne."I think these support my view better than yours.
That might be your view, but that is not the biblical view.My view is that God will carry out corrective justice. He has no need for retribution.
God is in the business of restoration and redemption, not punishment.
There are other definitions of justice, such as restorative justice, which seems to be what @St. SteVen is arguing for. One of the goals of which is to try and restore the offender to the community; that is not the biblical idea of justice. The biblical idea of justice is based on who God is--his holiness, righteousness, love, and equity. That means everyone who doesn't accept his free gift by faith, will spend eternity apart from him.Pardon: we are interrupting the dialog in progress for an aside—separate discussion of “What is Justice?”
Corrective justice: basically, redressing wrongs, making amends for damages.
Retributive justice: assigning the offender punitive damages proportional to the crime. As opposed to revenge, retribution is not personal, but is directed only at wrongdoing.
We agree personal revenge is forbidden by God, whereas retributive justice is reserved for tribes, communities, societies, . . . (see Matthew 18: 15-17; also 1 Corinthians 5).
So: can we say God carries out retributive justice on each of us upon death?
My understanding of the Evangelical belief is that God does Not grade on a curve: you either pass (Jesus as your savior) or you fail, utterly. (In contrast, the Jewish belief is that He does grade on a curve, with His own scales of justice.)
Strange, but you seem to be viewed as some sort of Christian Socrates, corrupting weak Christians with heretical ideas. If virtual hemlock were available, . . . .
Blessings.
My use of the word justice there was in reference to the Christian definition of God's justice.How so? Again, you stated: "What is justice except the human desire for revenge. (a sin)". But that makes God a sinner because "he has established his throne for justice," "He loves righteousness and justice," and "righteousness and justice are the foundation of his throne."
They contradict, and so refute, your position.
Countless billions have gone to the afterlife without having ever even heard of Christ.When either we die or Christ returns, we face judgement based on whether or not we have allowed Christ to be Lord, through repentance and faith in him and his atoning work. That determines where one ends up for eternity.
So, the penalty for refusing a free gift (free = no strings attached) is to spend eternity apart from Him, which means burning in the lake of fire?The biblical idea of justice is based on who God is--his holiness, righteousness, love, and equity. That means everyone who doesn't accept his free gift by faith, will spend eternity apart from him.