I think there will always be differing opinions on this topic amongst Christians. I understand the way you are thinking as I also once thought the same way. Personally, I find the phrase "born again Christian" to be redundant. I agree that we should trust God first and foremost. But your verse is not speaking about owning a firearm but as a principle to follow. It's up to you if you want to read that into it.
I am actually leaning on my understanding of scripture as it has been revealed to me. I will try to explain that below so bear with me please?
I have to ask you though- In your mind
1. a police officer can not be a Christian?
A body guard can't be a Christian?
A security guard can't be a Christian?
the centurion?
and so on?
These men?
www.fcpo.org
2.Owning a gun is not what Jesus means by "those who live by the sword die by the sword"- the person who
lives by the sword or any weapon is an aggressive person who seeks out violence- a larger principle is here- those who commit themselves to violence as
their way of life invite similar consequences.
The Christian who stops this evil is not sinning.
Peter initiated violence and Peter was wrong to do that. The only thing that was to become of that was retaliation and escalation of violence. -Jesus corrected him and told him that he Had to fulfill his purpose. - If Jesus had not, many, including his disciples would have been killed. We are not speaking about the same scenario at all.
An evildoer who initiates violence is bent on a life of violence is savagely slaughtering others yes- he will indeed also die by the sword. <- That is Jesus was saying.
3.
Rahab broke God's commandment not to lie. She was not called a sinner for that, but the opposite.
Her lie saved the lives of the spies.
4. I was raised in the JW pacifist cult- Policemen can not be baptized as Jws- nor military or anyone with a gun. I was taught from very young never to break God's laws, and I agreed of course.
So, in Acts 15 where the apostles wrote to abstain from blood, I assumed I was being taught properly that God meant no blood transfusions were allowed ever under any circumstances. I never questioned that until one day--
I had been starting to have questions about some things I had been taught- Never about transfusions though. I was praying and reading my bible without the use of watchtower magazines which was forbidden. I had asked God for HIS truth no matter what it was. -
Anyway, one day as I was reading I came across Matt 12 and as I read my mind was suddenly hearing and knowing without a doubt that God's laws are for our good & not to harm us. While Jws were busy believing they were sacrificing their own lives and the life of others including their own children- that they had totally forgotten MERCY and replaced it with bodily sacrifice.
Of course the bible is silent on transfusions and of course you are not "eating" anything when being transfused, nor can what goes into your mouth defile anyone etc.. But the only thing I had revealed to me that day was MERCY- That God's laws were meant for good and never to overburden us. Even If it was considered eating blood in order to save a life there would be an exception because of mercy.
Jws put God's law above mercy. The sanctity of life is put far below the symbol of life. The religion causes people to die needlessly because the of God's law in the bible - they
need to just die or disobey God's law instead of giving a bleeding person a transfusion which is
merciful. Mercy not sacrifice is what God wants.
Would you work to get your oxen out of the pit on the Sabbath?
You believe that God's laws must be adhered to at all times no matter what? Before you answer that please read- Did Jesus have to teach the Pharisees what God's laws were about? Would you work to get your oxen out of the pit on the Sabbath?
Is it loving to watch little children being slaughtered by a madman as long as you don't break God's law? THINK!
5-
Matt 12
1At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath, and His disciples became hungry and began to pick the heads of grain and eat. 2But when the Pharisees saw this, they said to Him, “Look, Your disciples do what is not lawful to do on a Sabbath.” 3But He said to them, “Have you not read what David did when he became hungry, he and his companions, 4how he entered the house of God, and they ate the consecrated bread, which was not lawful for him to eat nor for those with him, but for the priests alone?
5“Or have you not read in the Law, that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple break the Sabbath and are innocent? 6“But I say to you that something greater than the temple is here. 7“But if you had known what this means, ‘I DESIRE COMPASSION, AND NOT A SACRIFICE,’ you would not have condemned the innocent.
------
How much more are children worth than an ox? Do we spare the life of the evildoer at the expense of them?
--------
Luke 14
1It happened that when He went into the house of one of the leaders of the Pharisees on the Sabbath to eat bread, they were watching Him closely. 2And there in front of Him was a man suffering from dropsy. 3And Jesus answered and spoke to the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath, or not?” 4But they kept silent. And He took hold of him and healed him, and sent him away. 5And He said to them, “Which one of you will have a son or an ox fall into a well, and will not immediately pull him out on a Sabbath day?” 6And they could make no reply to this.
--------
If a cop came to the scene of a mass shooting in a school and shot the criminal would you thank him & God for protecting you and your children or call him a sinner? Did God send him? Would you be the guy hiding behind the desk calling the police while children are being slaughtered by an evildoer?
-How about your neighbor is he a sinner for saving lives? How about your
Christian neighbor?
Does God want us
protected from evildoers where the sword is not used vain? -Romans- 13
continued--