Not an answer to my question. Doesn't surprise me as a coward cannot bear scrutiny.
Follow Jesus and the apostles is always my answer to the world.
We agree that Jesus is the example but you ignore that Jesus' practical solution to the problem of evil is violence.
Jesus didn’t employ violence against his enemies. Violence isn’t his solution to the problem of evil.
P.S.
I put this question to AI -
Is violence the practical solution of Jesus to the problem of evil?
AI Overview replied -
“No. Forgiveness and self-sacrificial love, rather than violence, are the practical solutions Jesus offered to solve the problem of evil.
Jesus explicitly rejected violence, teaching his followers to overcome evil with good. Specific tenets of his approach include:
• Enemy-Love and Nonviolence: In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus commands followers to love their enemis, bless those who persecute them, and ‘turn the other cheek’ rather than retaliate.
• The Rejection of the Sword: When arrested, Jesus stopped his disciple from fighting the guards, declaring that ‘all who take the sword will perish by the sword’.
• Absorbing Violence: Instead of returning violence, Jesus’s response to evil culminated in the cross. He modeled absorbing the world’s hostility without reciprocating it, demonstrating a commitment to breaking the cycle of retribution.
Diverse perspectives exist on how these teachings apply to human governance and the protection if the innocent. Many Christians interpret Jesus’s life as a strict mandate for pacifism, while others argue that the state retains a role in maintaining justice using force, even if individuals are called to a nonviolent ethic.”
My position is that followers of Jesus are called to his nonviolent ethic and the role of the state is to use violence, when necessary, to maintain order (Romans 13).