Fake Zionism

[quietthinker]

When you see misrepresentations and lies in the first few minutes thats enough for me. Never trust a liar.

I guess that's what many said of the Apostle Paul because to them their paradigm was more important to them than the message Paul went around the known World disseminating.

 

[stevesonthebay]

I guess that's what many said of the Apostle Paul because to them their paradigm was more important to them than the message Paul went around the known World disseminating.

I don't think Paul was misrepresenting or lying. He declared I am telling the truth of the message directly from Christ. He witnessed Christ Himself. He was executed for standing on that truth.

 

[quietthinker]

I don't think Paul was misrepresenting or lying. He declared I am telling the truth of the message directly from Christ. He witnessed Christ Himself. He was executed for standing on that truth.

I think you've misread what I've said steve.

 

[Jericho]

A couple of thoughts...

1. This guy is a Muslim, so of course, he hates Israel. As far as colonization, Islam is one of the biggest colonizers out there. They colonized the entire Middle East, North Africa, and parts of southern Europe before they were kicked out. And they're still back at it today.

2. Zionism is a political ideology, not a religious one. Well, duh. I'm not sure why this is a surprise or necessarily a bad thing. The most influential Zionist leaders were secular, and it has always primarily been a political, national movement. That is no different from the vast majority of countries in the world.

3. There has always been a continuous Jewish presence in the part of the world. There are just as many Middle Eastern Mizrahi Jews living in Israel as there are European Ashkenazi Jews.

4. He says Jews had centuries of access to Palestine and that Muslim societies generally offered greater security and religious autonomy. Jews were a protected group, but it came at a cost. Co-existence meant subordination and degradation. They held dhimmi status, which means they were taxed and treated like second-class citizens. Basically, they were forced to pay protection money. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War 1, they lost whatever protection they had, and Muslim hostilities against them increased. Even when they had dhimmi status, there were still a number of Jewish pogroms.

 

[Gray_Joy]

'Christian' antisemitism is the worst form of antisemitism ... they turn themselves inside out....

I cut that last part off so to inject my own sentence.
"they turn themselves inside out....to ultimately prove they are not of or in Christ."

Jesus was a Jew.
Antisemetics who claim to also be Christian? Are liars and Satanic.

 

[quietthinker]

I cut that last part off so to inject my own sentence.
"they turn themselves inside out....to ultimately prove they are not of or in Christ."

Jesus was a Jew.
Antisemetics who claim to also be Christian? Are liars and Satanic.

The need to get onto a hobby horse, the need to feel outrage and label those who see differently; does it have limits?

 

[Gray_Joy]

The need to get onto a hobby horse, the need to feel outrage and label those who see differently; does it have limits?

It would appear so,since you haven't yet posted another racist video.

Thank you for that.

 

[quietthinker]

It would appear so,since you haven't yet posted another racist video.

Thank you for that.

your understanding of what is said needs revision G_J

 

[Brakelite]

'It is a White European Athiest Colonizer Project'

An unusual perspective most are unfamiliar with.

Well, that was fun.

 

[Brakelite]

Thing is, true Euriopean history is very close to the way he had described. It is awash with blood, greed, war, and all manner of evil.

 

[Gray_Joy]

Thing is, true Euriopean history is very close to the way he had described. It is awash with blood, greed, war, and all manner of evil.

All the worlds history is such.
Our religious history is awash with the same things.

 

[quietthinker]

Thing is, true Euriopean history is very close to the way he had described. It is awash with blood, greed, war, and all manner of evil.

The Dark Ages is know in history for the period when the ecclesiastical Roman system was king of the castle. Imagine that....and wow, the followers of those that protested are knocking on this systems door.
Do we really want to go back to how it was for well over a millennium? Many current movements globally are taking on those values and standing in line ready to bow the knee.

 

[Brakelite]

The Dark Ages is know in history for the period when the ecclesiastical Roman system was king of the castle. Imagine that....and wow, the followers of those that protested are knocking on this systems door.
Do we really want to go back to how it was for well over a millennium? Many current movements globally are taking on those values and standing in line ready to bow the knee.

Add to the mix feudalism and rampant colonisation throughout the world, the associated Rome sponsored annihilation of entire cultures emf London sponsored attempted decimation of the same in Alistair's and NZ, and everyone thinks that after 1500 years the leopard had changed its spots.

 

[David Lamb]

Add to the mix feudalism and rampant colonisation throughout the world, the associated Rome sponsored annihilation of entire cultures emf London sponsored attempted decimation of the same in Alistair's and NZ, and everyone thinks that after 1500 years the leopard had changed its spots.

Just for clarification, and certainly no criticism or offence is meant, what is "emf"? When I see those letters, I think of the European Mission Fellowship, whose July prayer-letter I received by email yesterday. And what is "Alistair's and New Zealand"? I wondered if you meant "Australia and New Zealand," but that seems too different to be accounted for by a typo. Thanks.

 

[Brakelite]

I'm not sure it was a racist video. What I saw and heard was a recounting of s documented history of Europe. This wasn't new to me, and he isn't the first to broach this subject. That all of Europe during that period of time were dominated by white folk doesn't mean any recounting of that history is motivated by anti white sentiment.
I don't deny that history, in fact my homeland of NZ and my adopted country of Australia were both impacted by it, as did America. Remember the American revolution? There was a reason for that. Those who rebelled against England knew the history. Your pioneers understood the implications of a continuing British rule (which was not racist as they themselves were from European stock)...potentially a tyranny... as it was here in Australia against the natives and threatened to be in NZ if not for the exceptional fighting skills ofthe local Maori and adverse environmental impact for the British soldiery.
Such rejection of British rule in America, the south pacific, India, South Africa etc wasn't racist. It was complicated, it was political and it was to a great extent religious. But not racist.

 

[Brakelite]

Just for clarification, and certainly no criticism or offence is meant, what is "emf"? When I see those letters, I think of the European Mission Fellowship, whose July prayer-letter I received by email yesterday. And what is "Alistair's and New Zealand"? I wondered if you meant "Australia and New Zealand," but that seems too different to be accounted for by a typo. Thanks.

Ṭypo, or rather the inability of Google to correct my fat finger sliding too fast across the screen of my phone. My humblest apologies and a reminder to
A. Spell check myself and
B. Slow down. Here is a corrected and edited version....

Add to the mix feudalism and rampant colonisation throughout the world, the associated Rome sponsored annihilation of entire cultures and London sponsored attempted of decimation of the same in Australia and NZ, and everyone thinks that after 1500 years the leopard has changed its spots?

 

[David Lamb]

Ṭypo, or rather the inability of Google to correct my fat finger sliding too fast across the screen of my phone. My humblest apologies and a reminder to
A. Spell check myself and
B. Slow down. Here is a corrected and edited version....

Thanks for explaining - I hope you weren't offended.

 

[Brakelite]

Thanks for explaining - I hope you weren't offended.

Never.

 

[Gray_Joy]

If you watch the entire video ,even at the start,you'll see racism. He's known for it.

He's a radical Muslim (convert) and terrorism sponsor who is originally from Colorado. He's white!

He removes from the accounting of history,truth. And instead puts all transgressions upon the white race.

He's what is known as a race traitor. Because he removed himself from the race he despises and slanders.


It is easy to research his lecture history. Google Search

Google AI result for most recent search "Shahid is racist"

1.In series like Whites | Us and Them and A Message to White People, Bolsen—who is of Irish-German descent himself—speaks about white individuals as a single, uniform entity. He attributes negative psychological traits to the entire demographic, claiming that Westerners have been culturally programmed to be "morally callous" and inherently indifferent to human suffering. Critics argue that applying negative moral behavior to an entire race or demographic group aligns with the definition of racial prejudice.


2. Xenophobic Framing of Western Culture
Bolsen frames the relationship between Islamic societies and the West as an absolute, irreconcilable civilizational conflict. He routinely categorizes Western values, demographics, and cultural exports as malicious, calling things like liberalism and feminism "biological weapons". By defining all non-Muslim Westerners under a single hostile monolith, his rhetoric encourages severe "us versus them" xenophobia and total social segregation.


3. Broad Collective Guilt
A central feature of his messaging is holding ordinary citizens of Western nations collectively guilty for the actions, historical atrocities, and foreign policies of their governments. He argues that everyday individuals in the West are active participants in global exploitation, asserting that their routine daily choices make them directly complicit in systemic evil. [1, 2, 3]

I'm not sure it was a racist video. What I saw and heard was a recounting of s documented history of Europe. This wasn't new to me, and he isn't the first to broach this subject. That all of Europe during that period of time were dominated by white folk doesn't mean any recounting of that history is motivated by anti white sentiment.
I don't deny that history, in fact my homeland of NZ and my adopted country of Australia were both impacted by it, as did America. Remember the American revolution? There was a reason for that. Those who rebelled against England knew the history. Your pioneers understood the implications of a continuing British rule (which was not racist as they themselves were from European stock)...potentially a tyranny... as it was here in Australia against the natives and threatened to be in NZ if not for the exceptional fighting skills ofthe local Maori and adverse environmental impact for the British soldiery.
Such rejection of British rule in America, the south pacific, India, South Africa etc wasn't racist. It was complicated, it was political and it was to a great extent religious. But not racist.

 

[Gray_Joy]

If you watch the entire video ,even at the start,you'll see racism. He's known for it.

He's a radical Muslim (convert) and terrorism sponsor who is originally from Colorado. He's white!

He removes from the accounting of history,truth. And instead puts all transgressions upon the white race.

He's what is known as a race traitor. Because he removed himself from the race he despises and slanders.


It is easy to research his lecture history. Google Search

Google AI result for most recent search "Shahid is racist"

1.In series like Whites | Us and Them and A Message to White People, Bolsen—who is of Irish-German descent himself—speaks about white individuals as a single, uniform entity. He attributes negative psychological traits to the entire demographic, claiming that Westerners have been culturally programmed to be "morally callous" and inherently indifferent to human suffering. Critics argue that applying negative moral behavior to an entire race or demographic group aligns with the definition of racial prejudice.


2. Xenophobic Framing of Western Culture
Bolsen frames the relationship between Islamic societies and the West as an absolute, irreconcilable civilizational conflict. He routinely categorizes Western values, demographics, and cultural exports as malicious, calling things like liberalism and feminism "biological weapons". By defining all non-Muslim Westerners under a single hostile monolith, his rhetoric encourages severe "us versus them" xenophobia and total social segregation.


3. Broad Collective Guilt
A central feature of his messaging is holding ordinary citizens of Western nations collectively guilty for the actions, historical atrocities, and foreign policies of their governments. He argues that everyday individuals in the West are active participants in global exploitation, asserting that their routine daily choices make them directly complicit in systemic evil. [1, 2, 3]

Now,since that's quite a mouthful so to disect Shahids racist pov,let's continue with this.

"While his supporters argue he is delivering an anti-imperialist, post-colonial critique of global power dynamics, watchdogs and academic analysts emphasize that his method—using sweeping, dehumanizing language to judge entire populations by their geographic and ethnic origins—functions as a powerful tool for radicalization and social division."

To be fair, I asked AI this follow-up,to to fully explore the slant Shahid levels at "Colonialism".

Question: Was Colonialism the only afront in ancient European history.

AI response: *This continuation of answers to my query should be found on the initial GAI link I posted above. But,just in case:

Google Search

28 sites
No, colonialism was far from the only affront in European history. When looking at European history before global colonialism began (prior to the late 15th century), the continent was defined by brutal internal wars, systemic oppression, religious persecution, and mass atrocities. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

1. The Transatlantic Slave Trade Precedents
Long before European powers colonized the Americas and Africa, they enslaved each other. [1]

• Ancient Roman Slavery: The Roman Empire was built entirely on a slave economy. Slaves were acquired through European conquests (such as the Gallic Wars) and made up an estimated 30% to 40% of the population in Italy. They were treated as legal property, subjected to extreme violence, and forced into brutal labor or gladiatorial combat. [1, 2, 3, 4]
• Medieval Slavic Enslavement: During the early Middle Ages, millions of Europeans from Slavic regions were captured and sold into slavery across the Mediterranean and Middle East. The trade was so massive that the very English word "slave" originates from the ethnonym "Slav". [1, 2, 3]

2. Extreme Religious Warfare and Persecution
Internal religious violence in Europe caused immense death and destruction. [1]

• The Albigensian Crusade (1209–1229): The Catholic Church launched a military campaign in southern France to eliminate a peaceful, breakaway Christian sect known as the Cathars. It resulted in the slaughter of an estimated 200,000 to 1 million Europeans. It is famously associated with the phrase "Kill them all, God will know His own," uttered during the massacre of Bezier. [1, 2, 3, 4]
• Anti-Semitic Pogroms: For centuries, European Jewish populations were subjected to systemic expulsions, massacres, and forced conversions. Entire Jewish communities were wiped out across England, France, Germany, and Spain during events like the Rhineland Massacres (1096) and the Black Death persecutions (1348–1351). [1, 2]
• The Spanish Inquisition (Started 1478): Implemented just before global colonization, the Inquisition used state-sponsored torture, secret trials, and public executions (autos-da-fé) to root out religious non-conformists. [1, 2]

3. Brutal Internal Expansionism
The mechanics of later global colonialism were first tested and perfected by European powers invading their immediate neighbors. [1]

• The Norman Conquest of England (1066): Following his invasion, William the Conqueror brutally put down rebellions in northern England. Known as the "Harrying of the North," Norman armies salted the earth, burned entire villages, and slaughtered livestock. Over 100,000 people died from violence and the resulting artificial famine. [1, 2]
• The English Conquest of Ireland: Starting in the late 1100s, England began a multi-century violent subjugation of Ireland, stripping native populations of land, outlawing their culture, and setting up a template of settler-colonialism that England would later apply worldwide.

4. Severe Social and Feudal Oppression
For the vast majority of regular Europeans, daily life under the feudal system was deeply oppressive.

• Serfdom: Most Europeans were serfs—legally bound to the land owned by a noble lord. They had no freedom of movement, could not marry without permission, and were forced to surrender the vast majority of their agricultural yields to the ruling elite under penalty of death or torture. [1]
• The Crushing of Peasant Revolts: Whenever regular citizens attempted to fight back against extreme taxation and starvation, European rulers responded with overwhelming brutality. During the Jacquerie in France (1358) and the Peasants' Revolt in England (1381), tens of thousands of poor peasants were hunted down and publicly executed to maintain the strict social hierarchy. [1, 2]