You changed the subject again.
Nobody said Scripture contains no future events.
The question is whether a future event somehow resurrects an obsolete covenant, recreates two covenant peoples, and turns modern geopolitical Israel into the New Testament definition of Israel.
It does not.
You quoted Zechariah 12 and asked when they looked on Him whom they pierced.
John already answered you.
John 19:37 applies Zechariah 12:10 directly to Christ’s crucifixion.
So once again, the apostle interprets the prophet, and you run past the apostle looking for the fulfillment your system prefers.
Romans 11 does not save the argument either.
Paul gives you ONE olive tree.
Branches stand by faith.
Branches are broken off through unbelief.
They are grafted back in if they do not remain in unbelief.
That is not:
modern state + bloodline + land covenant + separate destiny.
That is:
ONE TREE.
ONE ROOT.
ONE MESSIAH.
ONE PEOPLE BY FAITH.
So stop saying “Israel” and quietly smuggling a modern nation-state, ethnicity, territory, and separate covenant into the word.
Paul put none of that there.
And a future prophecy does not resurrect a covenant Hebrews calls obsolete.
A future prophecy does not breathe life back into a covenant God has already superseded in Christ.
If your system requires that obsolete covenant to rise again, then your system is not following the New Testament; it's trying to undo it while still calling itself Christianity.
Repent.
So, what do you believe....
Matt 25:31 “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne.
Matt 25:32 Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.
Also already happened ?
