AI Book Report/Interview: St. John's Mystery (An End Times study for sure!)

[ScottA]

If what you are preaching is true then prove it plainly from Scripture in context.

That is not the biblical method, but a method also demanded by atheists and an evil generation.

 

[ScottA]

If it can't withstand the Word written, then the issue is not with me for calling attention to it. The issue is with the doctrine.

All that I have said can and does withstand the written Word. It just doesn't agree with what you believe to be true. Big difference.

Which, indeed is a doctrinal issue--your's.

 

[ScottA]

"To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them" (Isaiah 8:20).

Amen to that!

 

[ScottA]

No scripture is needed.” That statement right there is why I dismiss what you’re saying.

That's fine. Just get in line here behind the Pharisees ->

 

[ScottA]

you say Scripture does not have to support it.

That is a lie.

...and it's quite enough. So shall it be bound and written.

 

[bdavidc]

No...what I have quoted here above is you--not "The printed Word of God"--and being printed, is subject to interpretation.

So...you are wrong in your first sentence. Meaning, the rest of what you have to say is not to be considered reliable, or true.

It looks like you just want to get away from the test of Scripture so you can keep teaching your false gospel. Every time your teaching is held up to the Word of God, you dodge the issue and attack the me when I keep pointing to Scripture. And it shows.

The truth does not need to run from the Bible. Your false teaching does.

 

[bdavidc]

No, you are comparing my statements to your understanding of the scriptures. Even as if you think or believe that everything needs to be a quote verbatim. But that's not biblical.

Every time your teaching is tested by Scripture you dodge the test, and that is exactly why your false teaching is being exposed.

 

[bdavidc]

That is not the biblical method, but a method also demanded by atheists and an evil generation.

You call the biblical testing of doctrine “evil” because your teaching cannot survive it, and that is the mark of a false teacher, not a servant of the truth.

 

[bdavidc]

All that I have said can and does withstand the written Word. It just doesn't agree with what you believe to be true. Big difference.

Which, indeed is a doctrinal issue--your's.

All I use is the Bible, the actual word of God. You should read it sometime and quit giving the ScottA version to people. You are showing your true colors as a false teacher.

 

[bdavidc]

That's fine. Just get in line here behind the Pharisees ->

That is rich coming from a man who says “no Scripture is needed” and then calls the man demanding Scripture a Pharisee; you have it completely backwards, because the Pharisees were the ones Jesus condemned for “making the word of God of none effect” (Mark 7:13), and your own words are exposing exactly what kind of teacher you are.

 

[bdavidc]

That is a lie.

...and it's quite enough. So shall it be bound and written.

You just called me a liar, so here are your own words.

Post #129: “I have given scripture, though no scripture is required, in the way that you say or think you can rightly demand.”

There it is in black and white. You said it. Now you are calling me a liar for pointing out what you yourself wrote.

You can twist Scripture, dodge Scripture, and now apparently deny your own words, but the record is right there for everyone to read. Your own posts are exposing you better than I ever could.

 

[ScottA]

It looks like you just want to get away from the test of Scripture so you can keep teaching your false gospel. Every time your teaching is held up to the Word of God, you dodge the issue and attack the me when I keep pointing to Scripture. And it shows.

The truth does not need to run from the Bible. Your false teaching does.

You describe a biblical scenario...and put yourself on the wrong side

 

[ScottA]

Every time your teaching is tested by Scripture you dodge the test, and that is exactly why your false teaching is being exposed.

No, I dodge your false accusations, and put them back in your face, that YOU should be fully exposed. That is the flip side of truth from God, both promises of God are fulfilled, and the wicked are also revealed.

 

[ScottA]

You call the biblical testing of doctrine “evil” because your teaching cannot survive it, and that is the mark of a false teacher, not a servant of the truth.

That is NOT what I said. Typical that you would twist it and falsely accuse me.

 

[ScottA]

All I use is the Bible, the actual word of God. You should read it sometime and quit giving the ScottA version to people. You are showing your true colors as a false teacher.

You are not "rightly handling the word of truth." And your false accusations are just you projecting...and it's going to cost you.

 

[ScottA]

That is rich coming from a man who says “no Scripture is needed” and then calls the man demanding Scripture a Pharisee; you have it completely backwards, because the Pharisees were the ones Jesus condemned for “making the word of God of none effect” (Mark 7:13), and your own words are exposing exactly what kind of teacher you are.

Indeed, the works that I speak do show what kind of teacher I am.

But "backwards" is a matter of perspective. Go figure the Priests and Pharisees even thought Jesus was a false teacher. I was right to group you with them.

 

[ScottA]

You just called me a liar, so here are your own words.

Post #129: “I have given scripture, though no scripture is required, in the way that you say or think you can rightly demand.”

There it is in black and white. You said it. Now you are calling me a liar for pointing out what you yourself wrote.

You can twist Scripture, dodge Scripture, and now apparently deny your own words, but the record is right there for everyone to read. Your own posts are exposing you better than I ever could.

I said your half-quote, half-premise was a lie. That's what half-truths are, that's what Satan also did.