There is no more getting away with blasphemy.

[shepherdsword]

There is so much hate and lies witnessed here.

Let's fill it with Love and truth

 

[amigo de christo]

welcome to the ONE WORLD RELIGOIN . ALL brought to us b y THE PHRASE GOD IS LOVE .
THEY DUPED EVERY LAST one too . but not the sheep .
JESUS SHEEP KNEW THE LOVE OF GOD WOULD NEVER CONTRADICT HIS WORDS .
sadly many BELEIVED A LIE .

 

[TitusTwoWife]

you know its true sister . for years all they said was GOD IS LOVE and yet used
that to decieve this entire generaiton .
Satan knows FULL WELL how to use scripture yet how he will twist IT sister . AND HOW HE DID TWIST
THIS GOD IS LOVE he and his co wokers said often
TO recreate over time A god which ALL RELIGOINS could see as and believe as GOD . when it was the devil all along .

Hey brother. A certain son of mine has a birthday coming up. I think you know. Thanks for your kindness to me all this time. It means a lot.

 

[amigo de christo]

Let's fill it with Love and truth

TRUTH .
THose who have NOT the LOVE OF THE TRUTH
can never fill anything with love and truth .
FOR THIER LOVE will only love A LIE and will hate TRUTH .
HELLO ONE WORLD RELIGION
brought to us by THREE WORDS that even the DEVIL can say as did his many co workers say often .
GOD IS LOVE . only many seemed to love things CONTRARY TO THE TRUTH
and fell madly in love with this harlots LOVE , oh her ecumeincal inclusive love .
BUT as i said THOSE WHO HAVE NOT the LOVE OF THE TRUTH SHED UPON THEIR HEARTS by GOD
whose faith was IN THE REAL JESUS , they know not the LOVE OF GOD .
THEY fell for the love of a harlot as though it were the love of God . WELL . THERE IT IS FOR ALL TO SEE .
HOPE NOW many will flee this all inclusive god who is satan and his ecumeincal wonder ho who is the harlot .
AND BIBLE UP NOW .

 

[TitusTwoWife]

Let's fill it with Love and truth

Praise God! I'm with you!

 

[amigo de christo]

Hey brother. A certain son of mine has a birthday coming up. I think you know. Thanks for your kindness to me all this time. It means a lot.

He still has about six weeks i think . its in november sister . yeah i do remember it
as the girls was just past in aug , as the moms is may twenty fifth .
yeah i do remember dear sister .

 

[amigo de christo]

Hey brother. A certain son of mine has a birthday coming up. I think you know. Thanks for your kindness to me all this time. It means a lot.

just as all my reminders are out of love for this people . for i desire the death of none .
SO we gots to POINT to JESUS and i must correct and expose this huge one world religoin agenda .
ITs all outta love sister . And remember WE OWE GOD , HIS CHRIST everything . SO in all we do and all we say
LET IT HONOR THE LORD . and sin and a lie brings no honor to GOD . so lets remember that .

 

[TitusTwoWife]

just as all my reminders are out of love for this people . for i desire the death of none .
SO we gots to POINT to JESUS and i must correct and expose this huge one world religoin agenda .
ITs all outta love sister . And remember WE OWE GOD , HIS CHRIST everything . SO in all we do and all we say
LET IT HONOR THE LORD . and sin and a lie brings no honor to GOD . so lets remember that .

Ill remember, Brother! You are loved too

 

[lforrest]

Who has asked why blasphemy against the Holy Spirit in particular is unforgivable? While blasphemy against the Father and Son is forgivable?

The common answer is a cop-out in my opinion. It doesn't address the eminent blasphemy by the teachers of the law that Jesus was warning against. They had just accused Jesus of working miracles by an evil spirit, when he had actually been working by the Holy Spirit.

It is written that those who do not have the Spirit are none of his. It is clear that the indwelling Spirit is essential for salvation. The Holy Spirit is still on earth while the Father and Son are in heaven. Without the Holy Spirit there would be no way for us to approach God. So blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is like burning that bridge.

 

[Pierac]

I asked what your point was. I will not answer for you.

You will not answer... because the answer, does not fit with our "tradition of men"

Two Biblical verses. Just two. From these two verses... Tell me what the Church see about the Holy Spirit.

Matthew 10:20 (ESV) for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

Luke 12:12 (ESV) For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.


Now add... blasphemy of the Holy Spirit...

You still don't see do you?

 

[ScottA]

You will not answer... because the answer, does not fit with our "tradition of men"

Two Biblical verses. Just two. From these two verses... Tell me what the Church see about the Holy Spirit.

Matthew 10:20 (ESV) for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

Luke 12:12 (ESV) For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.


Now add... blasphemy of the Holy Spirit...

You still don't see do you?

Pose your statement as a statement, that what comes out of your mouth is from you and no one else.

 

[Pierac]

Pose your statement as a statement, that what comes out of your mouth is from you and no one else.

Here is my statement... for the third time!

Matthew 10:20 (ESV) for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

Luke 12:12 (ESV) For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.

A further comparison points in the same direction, and this one reaches back into the Old Testament. When Jesus is accused of casting out demons by the prince of demons, Luke records his reply: “But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Luke 11:20, ESV). Matthew preserves the same saying with a single, significant difference: “But if it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Matthew 12:28, ESV).

Everything else remains the same. Where Luke writes “finger of God,” Matthew writes “Spirit of God.” The two Gospel writers present the expressions as describing the same divine activity, as shown above with “Spirit of your Father.”

That comparison becomes even more meaningful when we remember where the phrase “finger of God” comes from. It is not merely an isolated figure of speech. In Exodus, Pharaoh’s magicians admit defeat by declaring, “This is the finger of God” (Exodus 8:19, ESV). Later, the stone tablets of the covenant are said to be “written with the finger of God” (Exodus 31:18, ESV).

In both passages, the phrase describes God Himself acting directly. There is no intermediary between God’s will and what takes place. Matthew’s wording therefore naturally invites the reader to understand the Spirit of God in the same way: as God’s own active presence and power at work. This reaches the same conclusion as the earlier Hebrew ruach, but from an entirely different line of biblical evidence.

The same pattern appears elsewhere in Scripture. Being led by the Spirit, having the mind of God, and letting the word of Christ dwell richly within are presented as closely related realities rather than entirely separate experiences. Each describes God’s active work within His people.

One final observation deserves mention. Throughout the Bible, no explicit prayers are addressed to the Holy Spirit. Likewise, in Revelation’s closing vision of the new creation, the redeemed stand before the throne of God and of the Lamb, yet no third throne is described. These observations do not prove the case by themselves, nor should they be asked to. But many readers see them as fitting naturally within the broader biblical pattern that has emerged throughout this discussion.

 

[Ronald Nolette]

On the contrary, if many can unknowingly entertain angels, many can also unknowingly entertain the Holy Spirit...and it is their own behavior that determines whether it is blasphemy or not.

Sorry, but I will go wth the definition of the word blasphemy as was understood by the God/man and all His followers as well as the 1st century church.

 

[ScottA]

Here is my statement... for the third time!

Matthew 10:20 (ESV) for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

Luke 12:12 (ESV) For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.

A further comparison points in the same direction, and this one reaches back into the Old Testament. When Jesus is accused of casting out demons by the prince of demons, Luke records his reply: “But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Luke 11:20, ESV). Matthew preserves the same saying with a single, significant difference: “But if it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Matthew 12:28, ESV).

Everything else remains the same. Where Luke writes “finger of God,” Matthew writes “Spirit of God.” The two Gospel writers present the expressions as describing the same divine activity, as shown above with “Spirit of your Father.”

That comparison becomes even more meaningful when we remember where the phrase “finger of God” comes from. It is not merely an isolated figure of speech. In Exodus, Pharaoh’s magicians admit defeat by declaring, “This is the finger of God” (Exodus 8:19, ESV). Later, the stone tablets of the covenant are said to be “written with the finger of God” (Exodus 31:18, ESV).

In both passages, the phrase describes God Himself acting directly. There is no intermediary between God’s will and what takes place. Matthew’s wording therefore naturally invites the reader to understand the Spirit of God in the same way: as God’s own active presence and power at work. This reaches the same conclusion as the earlier Hebrew ruach, but from an entirely different line of biblical evidence.

The same pattern appears elsewhere in Scripture. Being led by the Spirit, having the mind of God, and letting the word of Christ dwell richly within are presented as closely related realities rather than entirely separate experiences. Each describes God’s active work within His people.

One final observation deserves mention. Throughout the Bible, no explicit prayers are addressed to the Holy Spirit. Likewise, in Revelation’s closing vision of the new creation, the redeemed stand before the throne of God and of the Lamb, yet no third throne is described. These observations do not prove the case by themselves, nor should they be asked to. But many readers see them as fitting naturally within the broader biblical pattern that has emerged throughout this discussion.

Good--thanks!

Is there a specific example that you could give that you see "as fitting naturally within the broader biblical pattern that has emerged throughout this discussion?"

 

[ScottA]

Sorry, but I will go wth the definition of the word blasphemy as was understood by the God/man and all His followers as well as the 1st century church.

Then it is as I said, You do not understand.

 

[Pierac]

Good--thanks!

Is there a specific example that you could give that you see "as fitting naturally within the broader biblical pattern that has emerged throughout this discussion?"

ScottA: It has not been given to me to allow the blind to see... but to those whom have eyes to see and ears to hear....

Matthew 10:20 (ESV) for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

Luke 12:12 (ESV) For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.

A further comparison points in the same direction, and this one reaches back into the Old Testament. When Jesus is accused of casting out demons by the prince of demons, Luke records his reply: “But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Luke 11:20, ESV). Matthew preserves the same saying with a single, significant difference: “But if it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Matthew 12:28, ESV).

Everything else remains the same. Where Luke writes “finger of God,” Matthew writes “Spirit of God.” The two Gospel writers present the expressions as describing the same divine activity, as shown above with “Spirit of your Father.”

That comparison becomes even more meaningful when we remember where the phrase “finger of God” comes from. It is not merely an isolated figure of speech. In Exodus, Pharaoh’s magicians admit defeat by declaring, “This is the finger of God” (Exodus 8:19, ESV). Later, the stone tablets of the covenant are said to be “written with the finger of God” (Exodus 31:18, ESV).

In both passages, the phrase describes God Himself acting directly. There is no intermediary between God’s will and what takes place. Matthew’s wording therefore naturally invites the reader to understand the Spirit of God in the same way: as God’s own active presence and power at work. This reaches the same conclusion as the earlier Hebrew ruach, but from an entirely different line of biblical evidence.

The same pattern appears elsewhere in Scripture. Being led by the Spirit, having the mind of God, and letting the word of Christ dwell richly within are presented as closely related realities rather than entirely separate experiences. Each describes God’s active work within His people.

One final observation deserves mention. Throughout the Bible, no explicit prayers are addressed to the Holy Spirit. Likewise, in Revelation’s closing vision of the new creation, the redeemed stand before the throne of God and of the Lamb, yet no third throne is described. These observations do not prove the case by themselves, nor should they be asked to. But many readers see them as fitting naturally within the broader biblical pattern that has emerged throughout this discussion.

Take off your glasses that contain the Traditions of men! Your looking kind of silly here about now! Stop seeing dimly! Show us... "HOW DO YOU READ"? Luk 10:26 And He said to him, "What is written in the Law? How does it read to you?"

I do not want to be offencive but you are clearly still in the milk of the word. Being told what to believe by your pastor? It's obvious... Your choking on the meat! Having to repete your question over again and still, you do not understand! You really need guidance to continue here from your Pastor. Stick with the basics... Jesus saves... God loves you... Confess your sins... The Holy Spirit is out side your realm of understanding in the early stages of your growth...

Matthew 10:20 (ESV) for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

Luke 12:12 (ESV) For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.

See... you still don't understand! After how many times reading it above?

How do you not know these things?

 

[JustMe]

Well written. Thank you.

Here is my statement... for the third time!

Matthew 10:20 (ESV) for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

Luke 12:12 (ESV) For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.

A further comparison points in the same direction, and this one reaches back into the Old Testament. When Jesus is accused of casting out demons by the prince of demons, Luke records his reply: “But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Luke 11:20, ESV). Matthew preserves the same saying with a single, significant difference: “But if it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Matthew 12:28, ESV).

Everything else remains the same. Where Luke writes “finger of God,” Matthew writes “Spirit of God.” The two Gospel writers present the expressions as describing the same divine activity, as shown above with “Spirit of your Father.”

That comparison becomes even more meaningful when we remember where the phrase “finger of God” comes from. It is not merely an isolated figure of speech. In Exodus, Pharaoh’s magicians admit defeat by declaring, “This is the finger of God” (Exodus 8:19, ESV). Later, the stone tablets of the covenant are said to be “written with the finger of God” (Exodus 31:18, ESV).

In both passages, the phrase describes God Himself acting directly. There is no intermediary between God’s will and what takes place. Matthew’s wording therefore naturally invites the reader to understand the Spirit of God in the same way: as God’s own active presence and power at work. This reaches the same conclusion as the earlier Hebrew ruach, but from an entirely different line of biblical evidence.

The same pattern appears elsewhere in Scripture. Being led by the Spirit, having the mind of God, and letting the word of Christ dwell richly within are presented as closely related realities rather than entirely separate experiences. Each describes God’s active work within His people.

One final observation deserves mention. Throughout the Bible, no explicit prayers are addressed to the Holy Spirit. Likewise, in Revelation’s closing vision of the new creation, the redeemed stand before the throne of God and of the Lamb, yet no third throne is described. These observations do not prove the case by themselves, nor should they be asked to. But many readers see them as fitting naturally within the broader biblical pattern that has emerged throughout this discussion.

 

[ScottA]

ScottA: It has not been given to me to allow the blind to see... but to those whom have eyes to see and ears to hear....

Matthew 10:20 (ESV) for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

Luke 12:12 (ESV) For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.

A further comparison points in the same direction, and this one reaches back into the Old Testament. When Jesus is accused of casting out demons by the prince of demons, Luke records his reply: “But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Luke 11:20, ESV). Matthew preserves the same saying with a single, significant difference: “But if it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Matthew 12:28, ESV).

Everything else remains the same. Where Luke writes “finger of God,” Matthew writes “Spirit of God.” The two Gospel writers present the expressions as describing the same divine activity, as shown above with “Spirit of your Father.”

That comparison becomes even more meaningful when we remember where the phrase “finger of God” comes from. It is not merely an isolated figure of speech. In Exodus, Pharaoh’s magicians admit defeat by declaring, “This is the finger of God” (Exodus 8:19, ESV). Later, the stone tablets of the covenant are said to be “written with the finger of God” (Exodus 31:18, ESV).

In both passages, the phrase describes God Himself acting directly. There is no intermediary between God’s will and what takes place. Matthew’s wording therefore naturally invites the reader to understand the Spirit of God in the same way: as God’s own active presence and power at work. This reaches the same conclusion as the earlier Hebrew ruach, but from an entirely different line of biblical evidence.

The same pattern appears elsewhere in Scripture. Being led by the Spirit, having the mind of God, and letting the word of Christ dwell richly within are presented as closely related realities rather than entirely separate experiences. Each describes God’s active work within His people.

One final observation deserves mention. Throughout the Bible, no explicit prayers are addressed to the Holy Spirit. Likewise, in Revelation’s closing vision of the new creation, the redeemed stand before the throne of God and of the Lamb, yet no third throne is described. These observations do not prove the case by themselves, nor should they be asked to. But many readers see them as fitting naturally within the broader biblical pattern that has emerged throughout this discussion.

Take off your glasses that contain the Traditions of men! Your looking kind of silly here about now! Stop seeing dimly! Show us... "HOW DO YOU READ"? Luk 10:26 And He said to him, "What is written in the Law? How does it read to you?"

I do not want to be offencive but you are clearly still in the milk of the word. Being told what to believe by your pastor? It's obvious... Your choking on the meat! Having to repete your question over again and still, you do not understand! You really need guidance to continue here from your Pastor. Stick with the basics... Jesus saves... God loves you... Confess your sins... The Holy Spirit is out side your realm of understanding in the early stages of your growth...

Matthew 10:20 (ESV) for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

Luke 12:12 (ESV) For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.

See... you still don't understand! After how many times reading it above?

How do you not know these things?

You doing a lousy job of presenting yourself is on you...and it's still a lousy presentation.

The only clear question is the very last one...because it would seem to be separate. But even that could be a hypothetical question.

If you are asking me, I have many times clearly stated my answer. Which is: The words are not mine, but His' who sent me, each time elaborating with applicable details.

 

[Pierac]

You doing a lousy job of presenting yourself is on you...and it's still a lousy presentation.

The only clear question is the very last one...because it would seem to be separate. But even that could be a hypothetical question.

If you are asking me, I have many times clearly stated my answer. Which is: The words are not mine, but His' who sent me, each time elaborating with applicable details.

Matthew 10:20 (ESV) for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

Luke 12:12 (ESV) For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.

Dude these are Jesus' words not mine! This is why you fail!

 

[ScottA]

Matthew 10:20 (ESV) for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

Luke 12:12 (ESV) For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.

Dude these are Jesus' words not mine! This is why you fail!

Still a lousy presentation. "This" does not explain "why" you posted a couple verses.