Sinless Perfection. Why do so many teach against what Jesus taught?

[marks]

So who died? Someone did. Do you know who?

Not David.

Plain and simple.

No games.

 

[1stCenturyLady]

Not David.

Plain and simple.

No games.

His baby that was conceived by Bathsheba.

Sins unto death will get their due.

David's repentance was accepted.

 

[Judge Hardcastle]

There are two types of sin, but you don't recognize that because you've been taught a dumbed down version of "sin is sin."

I know what the Bible says about the two types of sin you are talking about and what changed concerning those two types with the appearing of Christ in this New Covenant. It's impossible to deny what I showed you it says.

 

[marks]

His baby that was conceived by Bathsheba.

Sins unto death will get their due.

David's repentance was accepted.

That's called moving the goalposts. Your "sin unto death" means someone else's death? But then, that's what Jesus did, dying for us. David's baby did not die for our sins.

 

[ProDeo]

ecumeincalism is gonna end this generation .
Cause all its unity does is flap its lips about judge not
and allows even those who not only support sins to remain
but even those who preach a false inclusive gospel . seems this generation is more worried
about trying to keep the peace and fellowship under a false unity , THAN it is
even about the keeping of the one true gospel .
I dont think JESUS , paul or john were worried about trying to keep the peace
and keep the unity with ANYONE who taught a false gospel . Fact is they said LET them be accursed .
Fact is john said dont even let them in your house or BID them god speed .
yes , it seems to me that many , their god is the ecuemeincal inclusive one .
And that god is totally unable to save them . Just a friendly reminder .

I am sorry, I don't see Ecumenism, only division.

 

[1stCenturyLady]

I know what the Bible says about the two types of sin you are talking about and what changed concerning those two types with the appearing of Christ in this New Covenant. It's impossible to deny what I showed you it says.

God doesn't change about sin. John Calvin is not God. And the New Covenant is where I found the two types of sin. Then I found it originated in the Old Covenant. Judge, it seems you know Calvinism, but not the Bible. Let me help you. I know the true gospel and it is really very simple. Calvinism can lead someone to treating sins unto death as sins not unto death; and past sins are taken away from our conscience, not past, present and future sins unto death. Only unintentional sins not unto death which are forgiven in the present and future, NOT willful lawlessness. Willful sins committed based on someone's belief in OSAS is heresy, and frankly, of the devil. The errors in Calvinism have mostly to do with sin. Like, "sin is sin." Mortal and venial sins are not even close to being the same.

 

[amigo de christo]

I am sorry, I don't see Ecumenism, only division.

I have an idea pro deo how about we meet in the middle .
I am quite happy to be divided out from ecumeincism . Now to the trenches one and all . This sheep aint looking back my friend .

 

[Judge Hardcastle]

God doesn't change about sin.

Wrong.
Here's where God did change about sin:

Acts 13:38-39
38Therefore be it known to you⁺, men, brothers, that through this One forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you⁺. 39And in Him everyone believing is justified from all things from which you⁺ were not able to be justified in the law of Moses.

That's a change about sin.

And the New Covenant is where I found the two types of sin. Then I found it originated in the Old Covenant.

You err because you define 'sin unto death' in 1 John 5:16 to include the sin that God said is no longer unto death in this New Covenant.

 

[Judge Hardcastle]

Judge, it seems you know Calvinism, but not the Bible.

I know enough about Calvinism to know you are not representing it accurately.

Your private war against Calvinism is actually a war against Free Grace doctrine, not Calvinism. That much I know. Calvinism agrees with you that one cannot sin themselves unto death because they are born again and have the seed of God within them. You don't realize your misguided and determined effort to strip 1 John 3:6-10 of it's Calvinistic OSAS meaning actually defends and affirms it.

Free Grace doctrine is the doctrine that teaches a born again person can purposely and deliberately sin all they want and they will remain saved. Calvinism affirms 1 John 3:6-10, as you do, that a born again person can't and won't do that.

 

[Judge Hardcastle]

Only unintentional sins not unto death which are forgiven in the present and future, NOT willful lawlessness. Willful sins committed based on someone's belief in OSAS is heresy, and frankly, of the devil.

You don't seem to realize that Calvinism teaches that the person who sins willfully is showing themselves to not be born again. That is completely consistent with 1 John 3:6-10. So no argument is being made in Calvinism that a born again person can willfully sin and be OSAS. Free Grace doctrine makes that argument, not Calvinism. The willfully sinning person in Calvinism is not born again to begin with for him to somehow be OSAS.

 

[ProDeo]

I have an idea pro deo how about we meet in the middle .
I am quite happy to be divided out from ecumeincism . Now to the trenches one and all . This sheep aint looking back my friend .

You are worried, and with reason.

Take care.