Sorry. You did reply.God says what the Bible says.
I say yes.
See post 220
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Sorry. You did reply.God says what the Bible says.
I say yes.
God says what the Bible says.
I say yes.
Who's doing the "advising"? IOW, who do you look to, for the authority to do the things that you do? always remembering that there is a form of obedience that leads to death:However, it is advised to look at it like you was studying a medical book and need a medical dictionary to go with it. I use a dictionary anyway, whatever translation I use.
This directly contradicts the Holy Bible:If you want to study the bible...you're going to have to trust men to teach it to you.
Rather, salvation is covenantal.Is salvation unconditionally eternal?
Those who would champion the necessity of men's dictionaries have it backwards. The KJV is a looking glass, looking back at 1000 years of the history of our culture's thinking and beliefs. The Webster's and Oxford dictionaries match the KJV's definitions exactly, because the KJV preceded them. God created the meaning of the words in the Holy Bible itself. People read the Holy Bible and picked up those meanings. The dictionaries of men merely reflect the culture.WE NEED MEN'S DICTIONARIES, ETC. ETC.
Attempting to slam the topic into a KJV-Only straw man argument or a secular dictionaries argument is a major fail. Scholars agree that the English language did not become fixed until the King James Bible. Earlier editions, like the Tyndale and the Geneva, although practically identical to the KJV, did not always contain the built-in dictionary found in the KJV. They did not need it, because they were written at that unusual juncture in history when English was becoming English; the root languages of Anglo-Saxon, French, and Latin were still familiar.KJV-ONLY, BIBLE WORSHIP, ETC. ETC.
Yes, just use a dictionary from the KJV era when dealing with words that make you go hmmmmm :)Everyone used the KJV when I became a Christian. It was normal to read it with a group and a teacher who was learned. However, it is advised to look at it like you was studying a medical book and need a medical dictionary to go with it. I use a dictionary anyway, whatever translation I use. Some of the old testament names are tongue twisters. How many here use the spellchecker when typing? Well, the spellchecker is a dictionary.
I do. However, I grew up at a time when everyone used the KJV. I learned it then. I was merely recommending for new Christians or new to the KJV to use a Bible dictionary. I still go to bible studies with men using the KJV. It reads normal to us, and quoting the KJV is natural.Yes, just use a dictionary from the KJV era when dealing with words that make you go hmmmmm :)
God gave us a brain to use and the Holy Spirit to guide into all knowledge and truth, and God gave us tools to use. How are you going learn the history of the middle east? How are going to learn about weddings in the first century, that Jesus refers to in His parables? What kind of bread at the Lord's supper? Etc. Yes, you need a bible dictionary..
Who's doing the "advising"? IOW, who do you look to, for the authority to do the things that you do? always remembering that there is a form of obedience that leads to death:
Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness? (Romans 6:16).
.
Who's doing the "advising"? IOW, who do you look to, for the authority to do the things that you do? always remembering that there is a form of obedience that leads to death:
Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness? (Romans 6:16).
This directly contradicts the Holy Bible:
If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him. (James 1:5)
From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: 0ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts. (James 4:1-3)
We are repeatedly told to TRUST NO MAN:
Scripture tells us many times to trust no man. Indeed, we should not trust any man, including ourselves. The Bible says, "Trust ye not in a friend, put ye not confidence in a guide: keep the doors of thy mouth from her that lieth in thy bosom" (Micah 7:5). It also says "Take ye heed every one of his neighbour, and trust ye not in any brother: for every brother will utterly supplant, and every neighbour will walk with slanders" (Jeremiah 9:4), "He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered" (Proverbs 28:26), "But we had the sentence of death in ourselves, that we should not trust in ourselves, but in God which raiseth the dead" (2 Corinthians 1:9), "Do ye look on things after the outward appearance? if any man trust to himself that he is Christ's, let him of himself think this again, that, as he is Christ's, even so are we Christ's" (2 Corinthians 10:7), "Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD" (Jeremiah 17:5), and finally, "Behold, ye trust in lying words, that cannot profit." (Jeremiah 7:8)
This thread is about biblical versions...Rather, salvation is covenantal.
Let's put all this "dictionary" confusion to rest.
An examination of the 1000 most difficult words in the KJV reveals that God defines all of them, in the context, in their first usage, using the very words of the Webster's or Oxford English Dictionary. The brief overview of the Holy Bible's built-in dictionary in post #185 is offered to give enough examples of how God's built-in dictionary works, thereby allowing the reader a head-start in discovering this dictionary for himself.
Those who would champion the necessity of men's dictionaries have it backwards. The KJV is a looking glass, looking back at 1000 years of the history of our culture's thinking and beliefs. The Webster's and Oxford dictionaries match the KJV's definitions exactly, because the KJV preceded them. God created the meaning of the words in the Holy Bible itself. People read the Holy Bible and picked up those meanings. The dictionaries of men merely reflect the culture.
Attempting to slam the topic into a KJV-Only straw man argument or a secular dictionaries argument is a major fail. Scholars agree that the English language did not become fixed until the King James Bible. Earlier editions, like the Tyndale and the Geneva, although practically identical to the KJV, did not always contain the built-in dictionary found in the KJV. They did not need it, because they were written at that unusual juncture in history when English was becoming English; the root languages of Anglo-Saxon, French, and Latin were still familiar.
.
A person should read whatever version they understand.
Some believe it means to drag, based on the usage of this word in other verses.
I don't know about a Queen James version.The gay people read the "queen james" version because it support homosexuality
Do you use the queen james version too and believe it's OK to be gay?
Do you think that's what gives the grad queens reason to think it's OK to dress in drag?
Senator elect Talrico down in Texas claims to be a Christian and he says Christians can be drag queens and gay.
Think he's right about that?
Some bible versions have been written to make them read as though this is all good with the Lord.