Obviously not since you continue to break His laws.
Oh really? What laws are those? I do my best to keep the food laws for that I desire to be great in the kingdom (Matthew 5:17-20), and I also teach that we ought to obey them so as not to stumble our Jewish brothers and sisters; but
I also seek to be a good minister of Jesus Christ by proclaiming the truth that we find in 1 Timothy 4:1-6, iow, that
every creature of God is good and
nothing to be refused.
Gen 9:3 Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
So, in keeping with your style of Bible study, you take these words literally without seeking a deeper understanding. Therefore, this verse taken at face value claims human beings are "meat/food" as well since humans live and move. Or do you believe humans are excluded? On what grounds? I believe unclean animals are excluded as well on the grounds that 1) the distinction between clean and unclean existed before the flood and 2) had Noah, or anyone who got off the ark, ate one of the only two unclean pigs, for example, pigs would have become extinct and 3) it is obvious that we cannot take every verse at face value or we would all be cannibals.
So on the basis of (1) above, you would think that God would have simply included the word "clean" in Genesis 9:3, but He didn't. He said, "every moving thing that liveth," not, "every
clean moving thing that liveth." And we have gone through this before. The children of Israel even ate their own babies during a specific time in their own history, and I thought that we had also concluded that those people who ate people that had died in that situation in the mountains where they were trapped with no other food except to eat the people who had died, that we did not judge them or condemn them over doing so.
Finally, it is only common sense that human beings do not normally eat other human beings. Therefore I don't think the Lord even had to make the distinction for us to understand, because it is inherent in human nature that we do not eat cannibalistically unless it is an extreme or dire circumstance. But since the distinction had already been made between clean and unclean, you would think that God would have mentioned that unclean animals were prohibited from being eaten in Genesis 9:3.
And it is also simply an argument that is not based in scripture, that you pulled out of your head, the thing about cannibalism, it is carnal thinking not based in scripture.