that was the point after all? See if Hitler doesn't get to claim "Christian" by the same mechanism that we condemn the Muslim Beheaders then that makes one a hypocrite, right
Okay. However, the bible does not, as you've pointed out, give leave for Hitler to do what he did. The Koran, meanwhile, tells the Muslims to behead the infidels. That's us, by the way.
So, in point of fact, while the Muslims try and hoodwink the world and tell us it's actually a religion of peace, those who are actually being most true to its teachings, are the extremists.
not disagreeing, but imo the circumstances were quite a bit different for those, and as you are still convinced you are reading literal history i don't see a way to proceed here sorry. Maybe if you reffed a particular story we could see
So...let me get this straight. You like to reference the bible to make certain points. Points like "hide or flee" (although you never like to show where in scripture you find these little tidbits). But when it comes to others making points of their own, you simply toss out things like "oh, foolish you, taking all that so
literally! We can't DO that with scripture!"
Either your faith and your belief is built on scripture and the soundness, the solidness of it. Is it true, or is it not. Or your faith is built on nothing but subjective fancifulness that is liable to be twisted by anyone who comes along. And, oh wait! That's just what happened...
i think enough of It to treat It with more respect than i usually witness, ahem, but i would ask if you feel this way then why are you even tagging me? Ah, i see that's about to come out below,
ok thanks, and i know this seems all responsible and caring and all ok, but i would be passing on most anything that someone else wants for me, and wadr so would you Naomi. I want you to read Scripture from the perspective in which It was written, too, and realize how obviously Hegelian your interpretations are at the moment, so what right. I mean are you feeling the love yet? lol
I cannot see how my philosophy could be more unlike Hegelian, frankly. You think I'm all about trying to pair it down to a strictly rational idealism? I believe is a supernatural God who acts in ways that will always remain a mystery to us, and as such man will never be able to rationally understand His ways or full nature. That is WHY, though, scripture is so important. God has given it to us so that we may understand that much about him, and his actions here on earth. To dismiss his words as only a philosophical path to a better understanding of self, and therefore it can be both symbolic and flexible, is both a mockery of God and a total misunderstanding of his word.
And if you're talking about reading scripture from the perspective of how it was written, whether genre, culture or date, none of those things, while important, change the fundamental fact that God calls his disciples...ALL of his disciples (that's Christians) to take the good news to the Nations. He tells us that suffering will occur, even death, and that physical death and suffering in this age, this time, is nothing compared to the glory that is prepared for us. In fact, there are so many passages that speak of this, that I cannot really comprehend how you came up with the "run and hide" notion. How you can disdain all the martyrs over the centuries who stood proud in their faith even in unspeakable death. You don't endure that sort of thing without God's direct empowering. And in many, many place of the world today, and over the centuries, there was no option of running and hiding. Becoming a Christian basically signed your death warrent. Should we suggest that the bible suggests that they should not have done that, because it is better to run and hide than die for the Lord? You know the bible doesn't teach that.
For those of us sure of eternity, death in this life hold no real sting, it is but a gateway.
the struggle is real, huh Naomi :)
see, where your treasure is, there is your heart too see, so all that other speechifying is just window dressing k
this confession right here pins you plainly to a roadmap, see
fwiw Sharia court is right down the road from you now, been there for a while; been in our Scripture that you love so much more than me for quite a bit longer though, k
And once again you veer off into language I don't get. What treasure? What speechifying? What confession and why does it pin me to a roadmap?
How is a Sharia court right down the road from me? Are you speaking in time? How is it in scripture?
I wish when you made all these comments you'd paint them out a little. It's like you make comments thinking people have all the context, but really, they've come in at the end of the conversation, speaking a different language.