So are you saying that if somebody drove a nail through your hand the resulting red stuff wouldn't be real blood but 'bodily fluids'? Forgive me if I've got it all wrong but I don't really understand your answer.
Well, for this I would ask for the Quote of the nails, and you don't have one of those either, see.
There is a big, elaborate story being told on the surface, that has nothing to do with the truth, essentially. Unfort you are getting this from me, possibly the very worst way to get it, dunno what to say about that other than sorry.
But I would redirect you to the thing about the contemporary prophets and apostles, who were supposed to be already in the know about the "power of the blood?"
Also, I know of very few Christians today who are really aware that there was a literal "law of sin and death" back then, the one that got repealed I mean, not the real, spiritual one. Iow
an eye for an eye was not being observed, ppl got killed for lying, and even less I guess
But imo the long and short of it here is we have exactly zero Scripture for Jesus' actual
blood being shed, and we
do have "
blood and water" for a good reason I guess, to comport with Scripture elsewhere.
So, don't get me wrong Bc I don't know, ok, but what I see is if you think you need Jesus' blood to be shed in order for God to be ok with you, then you can find that, sure.