'Blood of Jesus'

[BreadOfLife]

Not <ALSO>. Peter sank; Jesus only, walked on the water. You, lie.

WRONG.

John 14:29-30
Then Peter got down out of the boat, WALKED ON THE WATER and came toward Jesus. 30 But when he saw the wind, he was afraid and, beginning to sink, cried out, “Lord, save me!”

Peter only sank because he lost faith due to fear.
Either STUDY the Scriptures - or stop debating them . . .

 

[BreadOfLife]

God is Witness!

God is Witness!

WHAT are you talking about??
WHY are you responding to a conversation that took place a YEAR ago??

I don't even remember the context of the conversation.
Refresh my memory . . .

 

[BreadOfLife]

Many places, for example,
Isaiah 52, 53
Isaiah 52, 53
“From every text in the Bible there is a road to Jesus Christ.” C. H. Spurgeon.
From Isaiah 52:8, “…when the LORD shall bring again Zion”, the road to Jesus Christ is the waste places of Jerusalem on Zion, on the Passover of Yahweh from Egypt through Babylon... the road to Jesus Christ from the Table to the Tree, on the fourteenth day of the First Month when they killed the Passover of Yahweh.
From Isaiah 52:9, “…Break forth into joy, sing together, ye waste places of Jerusalem”, the road to Jesus Christ, is the People of the LORD “comforted”, is, Jerusalem “redeemed”. “Thou stretched out Thy Right Hand .. Thou in Thy Mercy hast led forth the people, the people Thou hast redeemed, whom Thou hast guided in Thy Strength unto The Holy Habitation .. till the people pass over, O Lord, till the people pass over which Thou hast purchased. Thou shalt bring them in and plant them in the mountain of Thine Inheritance, The Place Thou hast made for Thee to dwell in, The Sanctuary, O Lord, thy hands have established. The LORD shall reign for ever and ever. .. Sing ye to the LORD, for He hath triumphed gloriously…” the road to Christ "on the sixteenth day of .. the First Month the Passover of Yahweh for you.”
As I said, many!

Once again - I asked you this question a YEAR ago. I don't remember the context.
Refresh my memory so I can respond.

Why the year-long absence of a response from you??

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

And you keep bobbing and weaving like an elusive boxer with your responses.
FIRST, you claimed that Jesus didn't shed any blood.

NOW, you're all over the place - throwing new confused and disheveled arguments into the mix that had NOTHING to do with the original argument.

Your entire position now is one of confused desperation . . .

You do not know about our previous discussions, BOL.

 

[BreadOfLife]

You don not know about our previous discussions, BOL.

Because you couldn't answer my posts a YEAR ago.

Now you dig them out of mothballs and expect me to pick up where we left off??
Not without some review. My life doesn't revolve around YOU . . .

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Christiaan Gerhardus Ebersöhn
What drove everyone mad in That BONE-DAY Night of Yahweh was that they could not draw blood to disfigure the Glory of God in the face of Jesus, just like Israel could not look on for the glory of Jesus Christ reflected in Moses' face.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

He has given you God's word in 1 Peter 1:19
No explanation is needed, you can deny this all ya want.

100% Self Explanatory

1 PETER 1
18 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers;
19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:

WHO DENIES?
100% Self Explanatory, "ye were not redeemed with corruptible things" like 'shedding blood' upon nothing or nobody but his own feet and face? Where's that blood? Gone, corrupted away! That's why you believe the RC bloody, bleeding, corruptible jesus in glass containers for preservation against elements like human touch? Or that's why you believe a SDA bleeding jesus in heaven shedding blood into oblivion for sins forgiven on his cross through his resurrection from the grave 2000 years ago "finished" / "perfected", "once for all" but blood so perishable ministered so abysmally it must be repeated continually? And when is it going to end?! He was crucified according to you and died, bleeding, and was raised "THIS SAME JESUS" still shedding his blood, and "THIS SAME JESUS" shall come again bleeding incorruptibly, unceasingly, incessantly "THIS SAME" dying bleeding, rising bleeding, in heaven bleeding returning bleeding Jesus? God save us from your blemished, wounded, lamb of god. “Vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers”!

 

[Pearl]

God comes to us where we are at, when we take a step toward Him imo. If that is what you need, sure, that is what you can have, and Nehushtan you can find later

You speak in riddles. Sounds like you are confused.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

PS 96
11 "Let the heavens rejoice, and let the earth be glad; let the sea roar, and the fulness thereof.
12 Let the field be joyful, and all that is therein: then shall all the trees of the wood rejoice
13 Before the Lord: for he cometh, for he cometh to judge the earth: he shall judge the world with righteousness, and the people with his truth." ....

"He shall judge with his Truth":
1) Jesus Christ "I AM THE TRUTH";
2) "There is one that seeketh and judgeth .. MY SAYING"; "he that rejecteth ME .. hath ONE that judgeth him: THE WORD I have spoken."

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

There is nothing to explain. That statement is very clear and self-explanatory.

Just as for every animal sacrificed under the Old Covenant, the blood had to be shed in order "to make atonement" for sins, so for Christ -- the ultimate Lamb of God -- His precious blood (having infinite value because He is God) had to be shed for our redemption.

If you resist this truth or you reject it, then you cannot possibly call yourself a Christian, since every true Christian is washed in the blood of the Lamb.

And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood...(Rev 1:5).

It's literal all the way or it's spiritual all the way. If the blood is literal, "washed us", is literal; if the blood is literal / real, the "lamb" is literal / real; if the blood is not spiritual but physical, the "shedding of blood" is not spiritual but physical. If his blood has infinite value because He is God, it was because He was and is the Lamb of God Our Passover. Not sinners mighty or weak men of the world, "shed his blood for our redemption"; his blood is "the blood of the Lamb", it "had to be shed in order "to make atonement" for sins", by Christ, not by the dust of the earth. He, the Lamb of God, had to be sacrificed under the New Covenant which is spiritual, not physical; is Divine, not human; is eternal, not repeatable or temporary; is "once" and "for all" IN CHRIST, not in or through or by mortal men.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

WHAT are you talking about??
WHY are you responding to a conversation that took place a YEAR ago??

I don't even remember the context of the conversation.
Refresh my memory . . .

BreadOfLife said:
https://www.christianityboard.com/threads/blood-of-jesus.25631/page-9#172
Ummmm . . . aren't YOU the one who pointed out that Lev. 17:14 tells us that life is containedin the blood??
To pour out one's blood IS to pour our one's life, Einstein . . .

 

[Enoch111]

It's literal all the way or it's spiritual all the way.

Not necessarily. Christ's blood was literally shed on the cross, but it is spiritually applied to the souls of the saints.

 

[BreadOfLife]

BreadOfLife said:
https://www.christianityboard.com/threads/blood-of-jesus.25631/page-9#172
Ummmm . . . aren't YOU the one who pointed out that Lev. 17:14 tells us that life is containedin the blood??
To pour out one's blood IS to pour our one's life, Einstein . . .

This conversation was over a YEAR ago when your posts descended into mindless gibberish.
Do you want to RESTART the debate - is that it??

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Didn't he bleed real blood when the thorns were slammed onto his head? Didn't he bleed real blood when he was whipped and scourged? Didn't he bleed real blood when the nails were hammered in to his hands and feet? How did he not shed blood?

WHY DON’T he bleed?! WE WANT real blood! LET’S SLAM the thorns onto his head! HE WILL BLEED! WE will MAKE him BLEED! WE, WANT his BLOOD! HIS BLOOD UPON US! If the Romans can’t get his BLOOD, WE’LL show them HOW! Hit that darn crown! Slam those thorns! His blood! His BLOOD! Let’s DRINK, let’s get intoxicated… with his blood!

Doesn't he bleed, this animal? Can’t he bleed, this vegetable root out of dry ground? He doesn’t even look like a man, a human being; he has no beauty that we should look at him or see him for something other than this cursed, formless, BLOODLESS, inanimate wooden thing. Scourge him, put the wood to flame with fire from the gods!

Though real blood we LUSTED this purple robe must do; take off that drugget without spot or wrinkle or tear or flaw our scourging despite, it must be magical. And put back on his own clothes; we haven’t whipped him through it—who’d expect we couldn’t find blood to prove he’s not the God he claims he is. Then bring him out and parade him before the crowd so they can see for themselves!

This Whole Day Selfsame BONE-DRY Day “in The Day of the Wrath of the LORD”, NO BLOOD? “They shall not satisfy their souls neither fill their bowels BECAUSE THIS IS THE STUMBLINGBLOCK OF THEIR INIQUITY!”


Didn't He bleed real blood when the nails were hammered into his hands and feet? HOW, did He not shed, BLOOD? "Because it pleased the LORD!" Because He is The Almighty God CRUCIFIED WHO "IN IT TRIUMPHED!"

Christ "poured out his soul" : "for the Almighty is the Health of My Countenance" : "Thou upholdest Me in My Integrity."

Psalms 40, 41, 42

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

So are you saying that if somebody drove a nail through your hand the resulting red stuff wouldn't be real blood but 'bodily fluids'? Forgive me if I've got it all wrong but I don't really understand your answer.

If that 'someone' is God Almighty from everlasting, there wouldn't be real blood or 'bodily fluids', but only his will, done.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

John 17:50 isn't talking about his being incarnated BEFORE he came to earth.
This is YOUR perverse interpretation.

No; this is the BOL talking bollie of me, GE, who does not speak about <his being incarnated BEFORE he came to earth>! You're a perverse liar, BOL.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Because you couldn't answer my posts a YEAR ago.

Now you dig them out of mothballs and expect me to pick up where we left off??
Not without some review. My life doesn't revolve around YOU . . .

Our conversation does not concern you, moth-BOLBreadOfDeath.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Not necessarily. Christ's blood was literally shed on the cross, but it is spiritually applied to the souls of the saints.

Necessarily! Christ's blood was not shed on the cross literally. That was why they crucified Him, called for him to be crucified SO THAT his blood could be on them and on their children! But they FAILED even with crucifixion. No blood spiritually or physically could be applied to the souls of the wicked.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

This conversation was over a YEAR ago when your posts descended into mindless gibberish.
Do you want to RESTART the debate - is that it??

This conversation took place, <May 6, 2018#172>

 

[Waiting on him]

This conversation took place, <May 6, 2018#172>

I believe many still cling to the idea that man took Jesus’s life