Subtracting Works

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Phoneman777

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2015
7,184
2,533
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It needs to be understood that "not of works" of Ephesians 2:9 does not eliminate obedience to God's will. It does eliminate the idea that man can do his own works and save himself and thereby merit his own salvation. A man could boast about such good, perfect work in saving himself by himself.

Yet many verses require obedience to God to be saved, Hebrews 5:9; Acts of the Apostles 10:35; Philippians 2:12. Yet man's obedience will not be perfect, therefore he cannot merit salvation nor have anything to boast about in his obedience. Luke 17:10 it is man's duty to obey God but he willl not be perfect in his obedience and still be an unprofitable servant in need of grace. Grace fills the gap when man sins and does not do as he is suppose to do in obeying God's will.

So works required by the law of Moses, works of merit will not save and have been eliminated by Paul but no NT writer ever eliminated faithful obedience to GOd's will but rather included and required it.

In Romans 6, Paul shows that even though we are saved by grace, yet 'grace only" will not save. Paul goes on to point out in Romans 6:16 that we are all serving one of two masters, we are serving either:

1) sin unto death
or
2) obedience unto righteouness

If one is not obeying God's will, then he is serving "sin unto death" and grace does not save those serving sin unto death. Yet grace will save those who are serving "obedience unto righteousness". So obeying God's will is necessary to keep one serving 'obedience unto righteousness' for not obeying God's will has one serving sin unto death.

So salvation is by God's grace AND man's obedience. Hence grace and obedience are not antagonistic one to each other but go together as hand in glove.
I fully agree with everything you said, but I think the part about "verses require obedience to God to be saved" needs to be qualified, seeing a person has no hope of fulfilling the least of God's commandments while he is yet unsaved, according to Romans 8:7.

I think we are saying the same thing if I put it like this: Obedience is the unavoidable, inseparable consequence of salvation...the lack of which being the evidence we are yet unsaved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brakelite

Ernest T. Bass

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2014
1,845
616
113
out in the woods
I fully agree with everything you said, but I think the part about "verses require obedience to God to be saved" needs to be qualified, seeing a person has no hope of fulfilling the least of God's commandments while he is yet unsaved, according to Romans 8:7.

I think we are saying the same thing if I put it like this: Obedience is the unavoidable, inseparable consequence of salvation...the lack of which being the evidence we are yet unsaved.
Obedience is a CONSEQUENCE of one being saved, but obedience is also necessary IN ORDER TO BE saved.

Some will claim one is FIRST saved THEN one obeys as a consequence of being saved, but as Paul said, one serves "obedience UNTO righteousness" and NOT "obedience because one already is righteous". Obedience leads one to salvation.
 

Phoneman777

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2015
7,184
2,533
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Obedience is a CONSEQUENCE of one being saved, but obedience is also necessary IN ORDER TO BE saved.

Some will claim one is FIRST saved THEN one obeys as a consequence of being saved, but as Paul said, one serves "obedience UNTO righteousness" and NOT "obedience because one already is righteous". Obedience leads one to salvation.
Romans 8:7 says it's impossible for the unsaved to obey. The solution lies somewhre in the middle
 

Nancy

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2018
16,761
25,324
113
Buffalo, Ny
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There are many spiritual believers that don't understand how God will judge the world...outside the church.

Some will read about the BEMA judgment in 1 Cor. 3....and assume ALL people will be saved...even as through fire.

But this is to mistake the judgment of God's house with that of the world.

So then if a person only sees one judgment...then one must assume that no one will be cast into the lake of fire. One must then become a universalist. (An error of course)

And then more errors are built on that error...like that there is a separate judgment for ministers away from the church...which is such a stretch....ridiculous even.

people will try every possible way to avoid the truth. That is in human nature. So I expect it...even from fervent believers.

The truth is presented in an obscure kind of way in order to confuse the surface seekers who look for self-righteousness...so that they condemn themselves in their condemnation of others.

Judge not the world! Lest you be judged along with them.

We are not to judge they that are without the church.

But we are to judge they that are within...by the Spirit.

These are held to the higher standard of a different KIND of life. The life of the Spirit.

Anyone who can't see that distinction has no understanding of the things of God and needs to be taught.

Second judgement for Ministers?? o_O I'd love to know how they back that one up! Yes, they will be held to a higher standard than one who does not teach, and we will be held accountable if we teach another error.
"But we are to judge they that are within...by the Spirit."
Yes indeed, and rightly so! After, of course, we ask Him to search our own hearts first, lol. Seems to me that the Church's of this day and age lack enormously in Spiritual things, especially humility. I would venture to guess that the majority of Christians that I know personally, would not receive correction very well, no matter how lovingly put :(
 

Ernest T. Bass

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2014
1,845
616
113
out in the woods
Romans 8:7 says it's impossible for the unsaved to obey. The solution lies somewhre in the middle
Romans 8:5-7 a person chooses which he puts he mind on, whether the flesh or spirit. People ae not locked in to only focusing their attention on the flesh but people can choose to mind things of the spirit as those in Acts 2.

In Acts 2, those whom Peter preached to were unsaved, yet while in their unsaved, spiritually dead state they were willing and able to listen to Peter, understand what he preached, be pricked in the heart, ask what the must do and obey what Peter commanded them in verse 38.

Again, Paul said "obedience unto righteousness" and not "obedience because one already is righteous".
 

Phoneman777

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2015
7,184
2,533
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Romans 8:5-7 a person chooses ...
And that's where the answer lies: choice. Which, as I constantly preach in here to our Antinomianist friends, is not works, but thought. When we make the cognitive choice to do God's will, it is then that conversion takes place and power is imparted to us to get the obedience accomplished.

Therefore, we get zero credit for the obedience He empowers us to accomplish as surely as the weight lifter gets zero credit for that final rep that is made only by the help of his Spotter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brakelite and Nancy

Phoneman777

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2015
7,184
2,533
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Second judgement for Ministers?? o_O I'd love to know how they back that one up! Yes, they will be held to a higher standard than one who does not teach, and we will be held accountable if we teach another error.
"But we are to judge they that are within...by the Spirit."
Yes indeed, and rightly so! After, of course, we ask Him to search our own hearts first, lol. Seems to me that the Church's of this day and age lack enormously in Spiritual things, especially humility. I would venture to guess that the majority of Christians that I know personally, would not receive correction very well, no matter how lovingly put :(
Everybody wants to be a saint in heaven, but nobody wants to be a saint down here...ESPECIALLY dem shady preachers :)
 

Nancy

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2018
16,761
25,324
113
Buffalo, Ny
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
And that's where the answer lies: choice. Which, as I constantly preach in here to our Antinomianist friends, is not works, but thought. When we make the cognitive choice to do God's will, it is then that conversion takes place and power is imparted to us to get the obedience accomplished.

Therefore, we get zero credit for the obedience He empowers us to accomplish as surely as the weight lifter gets zero credit for that final rep that is made only by the help of his Spotter.

It seems to me that submission really is the starting point of all of our growth, trust, faith. To obey is better than sacrifice! I cannot say that I know any Christians that would claim that they are free to sin in ANY way, much less morally, that should be a given even among the un-believers.
And, why do so many of us equate "obedience" with, "boring", "a chore" (which, IMHO, chore=works) or as anything negative, when God tells us clearly that
"Thou wilt shew me the path of life: in thy presence is fullness of joy; at thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore." Psalm 16:11

God will bless in all ways, if we obey. Not to earn salvation! But to live in Him. He will lead you to wise decisions that will last a lifetime if you let Him! Hear Him! I am not there yet but am striving to be.
Sry I derailed :rolleyes:


"Jesus was ready to give this woman, who was a slave to sin, running water. “Whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall become in him a well of water springing up to eternal life”
John 4:14
His cup stays full for our EVERY need. When we obey, good things start to happen in our lives. Not that bad won't too - but when
 

Phoneman777

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2015
7,184
2,533
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It seems to me that submission really is the starting point of all of our growth, trust, faith. To obey is better than sacrifice! I cannot say that I know any Christians that would claim that they are free to sin in ANY way, much less morally, that should be a given even among the un-believers.
And, why do so many of us equate "obedience" with, "boring", "a chore" (which, IMHO, chore=works) or as anything negative, when God tells us clearly that
"Thou wilt shew me the path of life: in thy presence is fullness of joy; at thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore." Psalm 16:11

God will bless in all ways, if we obey. Not to earn salvation! But to live in Him. He will lead you to wise decisions that will last a lifetime if you let Him! Hear Him! I am not there yet but am striving to be.
Sry I derailed :rolleyes:


"Jesus was ready to give this woman, who was a slave to sin, running water. “Whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall become in him a well of water springing up to eternal life”
John 4:14
His cup stays full for our EVERY need. When we obey, good things start to happen in our lives. Not that bad won't too - but when
Isn't it weird sometimes we think we'll just die if we don't give in to sin? I mean literally die, we want it so bad. But, if we just pray for power to resist and for God to captivate our thoughts, that irresistible temptation passes and we recover and then we're all like..."well, how silly of me...I guess it wasn't all life or death after all..." :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: brakelite and Nancy

Nancy

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2018
16,761
25,324
113
Buffalo, Ny
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Isn't it weird sometimes we think we'll just die if we don't give in to sin? I mean literally die, we want it so bad. But, if we just pray for power to resist and for God to captivate our thoughts, that irresistible temptation passes and we recover and then we're all like..."well, how silly of me...I guess it wasn't all life or death after all..." :)

Yes! For sure! And, that is exactly how it is when we have open minds and humble hearts :)
 

Ernest T. Bass

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2014
1,845
616
113
out in the woods
And that's where the answer lies: choice. Which, as I constantly preach in here to our Antinomianist friends, is not works, but thought. When we make the cognitive choice to do God's will, it is then that conversion takes place and power is imparted to us to get the obedience accomplished.

Therefore, we get zero credit for the obedience He empowers us to accomplish as surely as the weight lifter gets zero credit for that final rep that is made only by the help of his Spotter.

It is about what one chooses to set his mind TO DO. Those that choose to mind things of the flesh will do works of the flesh Galatians 5:19. Those that choose to mind things of the Spirit will walk after the Spirit Galatians 5:16.
Romans 8:1 "There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." "Walking" is what one does, how one lives and not a mere mental thought and nothing more. Those that choose to mind things of the Spirit will obey the things the Spirit has written in His word, walk by that word ie "walk in the light" 1 John 1:7.

Man is not born totally depraved leaving him powerless to obey God unless God first acts on him in some miraculous way enabling him to obey.
God has given man commands to follow and men choose to obey them or not. Those that have chosen to set their mind on the flesh will not walk after God's commands but will walk after the flesh doing works of the flesh. The commands God has given man imply man has both ability and accountability to obey.
 

Phoneman777

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2015
7,184
2,533
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It is about what one chooses to set his mind TO DO. Those that choose to mind things of the flesh will do works of the flesh Galatians 5:19. Those that choose to mind things of the Spirit will walk after the Spirit Galatians 5:16.
Romans 8:1 "There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." "Walking" is what one does, how one lives and not a mere mental thought and nothing more. Those that choose to mind things of the Spirit will obey the things the Spirit has written in His word, walk by that word ie "walk in the light" 1 John 1:7.

Man is not born totally depraved leaving him powerless to obey God unless God first acts on him in some miraculous way enabling him to obey.
God has given man commands to follow and men choose to obey them or not. Those that have chosen to set their mind on the flesh will not walk after God's commands but will walk after the flesh doing works of the flesh. The commands God has given man imply man has both ability and accountability to obey.
Romans 8:7 says, "For the carnal mind is enmity with God. It is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." Which of the following positions agrees with Romans 8:7 (please check one):

[ ] Your position: An unconverted, carnally minded man can obey God's law while yet unconverted.

[ ] My position: An unconverted, carnally minded man cannot obey God's law under any circumstance, except he be converted.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Nancy

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,688
15,996
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
An unconverted, carnally minded man can obey God's law while yet unconverted.
Read Romans 2:6-16.
14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the Law, do by nature the things contained in the Law, these, having not the Law, are a law unto themselves:
15 Which shew the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nancy
B

brakelite

Guest
Problem one. Disobedience.
Cure one. The promise of a Saviour.
Problem one continues despite the promise.
Promise becomes a reality. He "who shall save His people from their sins (disobedience)" arrives.
Problem one continues despite the promises of the Saviour,
KJV John 14
13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be g lorified in the Son.
14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.
15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.
Could that be simply because God's people do not want to obey and therefore don't bother asking for that power that enables them to do it?
Problem two. God's people excuse their continuing sin by claiming that despite the fact that mankind lost everything due to disobedience, Jesus death means mankind can now gain everything while still in a state of disobedience.
"Even if I sin and walk away from God, I am still saved."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nancy

Ernest T. Bass

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2014
1,845
616
113
out in the woods
Romans 8:7 says, "For the carnal mind is enmity with God. It is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." Which of the following positions agrees with Romans 8:7 (please check one):

[ ] Your position: An unconverted, carnally minded man can obey God's law while yet unconverted.

[ ] My position: An unconverted, carnally minded man cannot obey God's law under any circumstance, except he be converted.

A person who chooses to mind things of the flesh and continues to mind things of the flesh will reject things of God. Yet there is nothing in the context that says it is impossible for a fleshly minded person to change from that life of serving the flesh to a life of serving God. 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 those Paul writes to in Corinth "were" minding things of the flesh but are now washed, justified, sanctified. Paul is simply pointing out in Romans 8:7 that one cannot serve both God and mammon at the same time (Matthew 6:24) therefore man must choose one or the other to serve.

And since man can choose whom he will serve implies man is NOT born with a totally depraved nature preventing him from choosing to serve God. Those who mind the flesh are subject to 'condemnation' (Romans 8:1), so God holds them accountable for their choosing to mind the flesh. One could not rightly, justly be held accountable for how he was born against his own will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nancy

Phoneman777

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2015
7,184
2,533
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Read Romans 2:6-16.
14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the Law, do by nature the things contained in the Law, these, having not the Law, are a law unto themselves:
15 Which shew the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another...
"By nature" is the operative phrase. What is the "nature" of those doing the law, having never received the law?

Fleshly or Spiritual?

Obviously it is Spiritual - because at some point the Holy Spirit spoke to them through their conscience about right and wrong and their desire to follow after righteousness allowed the entrance of the Savior to which they will someday turn to and ask, "What are these wounds in Thine hands?" and Jesus will tell them the old, old story of His love.
 

Phoneman777

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2015
7,184
2,533
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Yet there is nothing in the context that says it is impossible for a fleshly minded person to change from that life of serving the flesh to a life of serving God. 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 those Paul writes to in Corinth "were" minding things of the flesh but are now washed, justified, sanctified. Paul is simply pointing out in Romans 8:7 that one cannot serve both God and mammon at the same time (Matthew 6:24) therefore man must choose one or the other to serve.

And since man can choose whom he will serve implies man is NOT born with a totally depraved nature preventing him from choosing to serve God. Those who mind the flesh are subject to 'condemnation' (Romans 8:1), so God holds them accountable for their choosing to mind the flesh. One could not rightly, justly be held accountable for how he was born against his own will.
Total Depravity is not what I'm talking about. Total Depravity is an erroneous idea (sorry and WADR my wonderful Calvinism friends :) I just don't find it to be Biblical) which removes all choice from the equation.

What I'm trying to get through to you is that there is a diff between choosing to obey and performing the obedience.

You've never tried to bench press one too many reps, where the only way you can get that bar back to the top of the bench is with the help of a spotter?

In the same way, when temptation comes, you may desire to escape it and the guilt you know giving in will bring, but the only way you're going to "resist the devil" is through the help of our Heavenly Spotter. If you disagree, that's fine, but with all the Bible has to say about spotty leopards, nothing good in us, and total inability to do anything apart from Christ, I don't understand how you can maintain your position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nancy

Ernest T. Bass

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2014
1,845
616
113
out in the woods
"By nature" is the operative phrase. What is the "nature" of those doing the law, having never received the law?

Fleshly or Spiritual?

Obviously it is Spiritual - because at some point the Holy Spirit spoke to them through their conscience about right and wrong and their desire to follow after righteousness allowed the entrance of the Savior to which they will someday turn to and ask, "What are these wounds in Thine hands?" and Jesus will tell them the old, old story of His love.
Total Depravity is not what I'm talking about. Total Depravity is an erroneous idea (sorry and WADR my wonderful Calvinism friends :) I just don't find it to be Biblical) which removes all choice from the equation.

What I'm trying to get through to you is that there is a diff between choosing to obey and performing the obedience.

You've never tried to bench press one too many reps, where the only way you can get that bar back to the top of the bench is with the help of a spotter?

In the same way, when temptation comes, you may desire to escape it and the guilt you know giving in will bring, but the only way you're going to "resist the devil" is through the help of our Heavenly Spotter. If you disagree, that's fine, but with all the Bible has to say about spotty leopards, nothing good in us, and total inability to do anything apart from Christ, I don't understand how you can maintain your position.
People that mind the flesh can change and not only can they choose to obey, they can perform obedience. There are examples in the NT of Gentiles that formerly lived in the flesh but upon hearing the gospel, changed, went from minding the flesh to minding things of the Spirit.

The context about a leopard not changing it spots is about Israel at a time in their history when they had hardened their hearts and refused to repent, hence they are compared to a leopard unable to change its spots. That passage therefore cannot be used in a universal sense about all men since it is specifically talking about Israel at a specific time in their history. The Bible has many examples of men repenting and 'changing their spots'.

Also, look at it this way: God created the leopard with its spots. Did God create man with sin? If so, then God has culpability in the sins men commit and therefore God could not justly, rightly condemn man for the sins God made man to commit against his will.

If Israel could not ever change its spots, then why did God ever chose/elect them to begin with knowing their spots cannot be changed? What purpose is there in Jeremiah preaching to them when they cannot change their spots? What was the point in God ever teaching them His ways, commanding them to obey Him, giving them a law of their own to have already knowing they could not change their spots?

But again, the context is specifically about Israel at a specific time in their history when they forgot God and trusted in falsehoods (Jeremiah 13:25). They chose of their own will to be in their sin, not ordained by God to be in sin as some Calvinists would have us think. Again, God ordained the leopard to have spots but did not ordain men to have sin for such makes God culpable for the sins men commit. God, thru Jeremiah, said to Israel "But if ye will not hear it, my soul shall weep in secret places for your pride; and mine eye shall weep sore, and run down with tears, because the LORD'S flock is carried away captive." "If ye will not hear it" - the conditional "IF" shows Israel had a choice to hear and if they did not then he would become sorry and weep for they would become captive.

Note in Jeremiah 18:8-10 that nations, as Israel, have choices. "IF" Israel would hear the words of God: "If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them." God would spare them IF they repent. But IF Israel would not hear and repent then they would go into captivity: "If it do evil in my sight, that it obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them". Again, Israel had a choice and Israel chose not to repent. Yet in the OT book of Jonah, Nineveh DID choose to repent and God repented of the evil He said He would do to them, Jonah 3:10. Was Nineveh as a leopard unable to change their spots?

Lastly, Jeremiah 13:23 "Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil." Jeremiah is not talking about how they were born but how they chose to live. 'Accustomed' means learned, taught hence they learned sinning not born that way.

You say you do not agree with the idea of total depravity, but then you speak about "spotty leopards, nothing good in us, and total inability to do anything apart from Christ,". Calvinists use the same text (Jeremiah 13:25) and same words (nothing good in man, total inability) as you do in promoting total depravity. You say man cannot change his spots, there is no good in man and man has 'total inability' What do you call this if it is not total depravity?





(The same is true in Isaiah 64:6. Again, that passage is speaking specifically about Israel when they were living in iniquity, hence their righteousness was as filthy rags before God. So it cannot be used universally about all men for the context does speak of God meeting/entreating those that work righteousness, Isaiah 64:5.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CNKW3 and Nancy

Phoneman777

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2015
7,184
2,533
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
People that mind the flesh can change and not only can they choose to obey, they can perform obedience. There are examples in the NT of Gentiles that formerly lived in the flesh but upon hearing the gospel, changed, went from minding the flesh to minding things of the Spirit.

The context about a leopard not changing it spots is about Israel at a time in their history when they had hardened their hearts and refused to repent, hence they are compared to a leopard unable to change its spots. That passage therefore cannot be used in a universal sense about all men since it is specifically talking about Israel at a specific time in their history. The Bible has many examples of men repenting and 'changing their spots'.

Also, look at it this way: God created the leopard with its spots. Did God create man with sin? If so, then God has culpability in the sins men commit and therefore God could not justly, rightly condemn man for the sins God made man to commit against his will.

If Israel could not ever change its spots, then why did God ever chose/elect them to begin with knowing their spots cannot be changed? What purpose is there in Jeremiah preaching to them when they cannot change their spots? What was the point in God ever teaching them His ways, commanding them to obey Him, giving them a law of their own to have already knowing they could not change their spots?

But again, the context is specifically about Israel at a specific time in their history when they forgot God and trusted in falsehoods (Jeremiah 13:25). They chose of their own will to be in their sin, not ordained by God to be in sin as some Calvinists would have us think. Again, God ordained the leopard to have spots but did not ordain men to have sin for such makes God culpable for the sins men commit. God, thru Jeremiah, said to Israel "But if ye will not hear it, my soul shall weep in secret places for your pride; and mine eye shall weep sore, and run down with tears, because the LORD'S flock is carried away captive." "If ye will not hear it" - the conditional "IF" shows Israel had a choice to hear and if they did not then he would become sorry and weep for they would become captive.

Note in Jeremiah 18:8-10 that nations, as Israel, have choices. "IF" Israel would hear the words of God: "If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them." God would spare them IF they repent. But IF Israel would not hear and repent then they would go into captivity: "If it do evil in my sight, that it obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them". Again, Israel had a choice and Israel chose not to repent. Yet in the OT book of Jonah, Nineveh DID choose to repent and God repented of the evil He said He would do to them, Jonah 3:10. Was Nineveh as a leopard unable to change their spots?

Lastly, Jeremiah 13:23 "Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil." Jeremiah is not talking about how they were born but how they chose to live. 'Accustomed' means learned, taught hence they learned sinning not born that way.

You say you do not agree with the idea of total depravity, but then you speak about "spotty leopards, nothing good in us, and total inability to do anything apart from Christ,". Calvinists use the same text (Jeremiah 13:25) and same words (nothing good in man, total inability) as you do in promoting total depravity. You say man cannot change his spots, there is no good in man and man has 'total inability' What do you call this if it is not total depravity?





(The same is true in Isaiah 64:6. Again, that passage is speaking specifically about Israel when they were living in iniquity, hence their righteousness was as filthy rags before God. So it cannot be used universally about all men for the context does speak of God meeting/entreating those that work righteousness, Isaiah 64:5.)
Got it. Thanks for your thoughts :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nancy