We are not rejecting the New Testament, just questioning if we have it all. I believe the Epistle of Barnabas is missing, but God has preserved it.
Well, yes you are rejecting what we have as the New Testament. Because Barnabas is not included. So, what is your method of determining the canonicity of 'Barnabas'? And is it an accepted method among the Church? Do you use the same methods employed by those who first were involved in the making of the canon? If you use the same methods, how do you arrive at a different conclusion? Why were they wrong?
Stranger