I don't have a problem if you're just saying "you think" or "you anticipate" Christ to come within the next several years, or something like that. It sounded to me like you were date-setting, but I guess I was wrong. You should be more clear that this is your opinion, and just your guess. You're being more clear about that now, and I'm happy you're declaring it is *not* a prophecy!
My argument that the Antichrist is in Revelation is not the same argument as the word "Antichrist" is in the Revelation. Only John used the word Antichrist. Using different synonyms does not, logically, imply that each synonym refers to something different! By definition a "synonym" is a set of different words, all of which refer to the same thing!
There is a reason John used the word "Antichrist," and it was likely because he was not referring directly to the circumstances that will surround the "Little Horn" of Dan 7. That context involved a set of 7 kings and 10 nations. But John is concerned primarily with contemporary antichrists who would be of a more immediate concern to his generation than a future Antichrist.
The same John wrote the Revelation, and there described him as a "Beast," because in that book he is describing the circumstances that surround the actual Antichrist in his time. The "Beast" comes from Dan 7 itself, and refers to an evolution of the 4th Beast, which I believe was the Roman Empire. In the last days, Daniel wrote, this Beast would evolve into 7 kings and 10 nations, all united under the Little Horn.
The Little Horn, therefore, is the Antichrist which John speaks of. And the term reflects the character of the Little Horn in Dan 7, who opposes God and His people, boasting against God and persecuting God's People. This "Man of Sin" stands as an obstacle to the approaching descent from heaven of the Son of Man, bringing God's verdict against the Man of Lawlessness. As such, this Little Horn is opposing, or standing against (anti-) the Christ who is to come and establish God's Kingdom. He is an Anti-Christ!