Recent content by Trekson

We agree on futurism but personally, I don't believe the papacy will have anything to do w/ the a/c as that's from the wrong side of Rome. The a/c's 10 nation confederacy will come from the eastern part of the Roman empire. At most I see a possibility that a pope might be the FP but that's...

Sorry but the Jesuits had nothing to do w/ futurism. God has always been a futurist from Eden until this present day.

Exactly! and those prophecies will come true when Israel performs the last three items of Dan. 9:24. It's called the throne of David for a reason. Just as Israel accepted King David as the anointed of God, so will they one day accept and anoint King Jesus over the nation of Israel!

Since you don't even understand what the word "dispensations" means, whatever it is you're trying to promote comes from an unrealistic look at what christianity means. There is a reason why there was about a millennia of time called the "dark ages". If that's where you're getting you're info...

I'm not saying that modern "man's" wisdom will prevail. The various dispensations are God's designs, not made up by man. What will make our knowledge of the end times greater is the outpouring of the HS upon the church that will be equal to or greater than that the apostles received. I believe...

Historicism may claim it but it's not accurate at all, imo. Many date the Artaxerxes decree at 444 bc. The time of his ministry is not in prophecy. The time of his baptism is not significant. The only prophecy that Christ fulfilled as the coming king and Messiah is from Zech. 9:9 and that was at...

Futurism has been the biblical standard since the first prophecy of Gen. 3:15 that took 4000 yrs. to fulfill.

They are three of the kings mentioned in Rev. 17 but it's not those nations themselves, it's the nations they each, in their time, ruled over that neighbor Israel that are "the people of the prince to come", speaking of the future a/c because it is folks from those nations, as Rome's conscripted...

Dan. 9: 26 and 27 are not speaking of the same event and the destruction of the temple was and is not the AoD and neither was the offering of pagan sacrifices by AE. The Aod is one thing alone and the image of Zeus that AE erected in the temple was a "type" for the real AoD which is depicted in...

Dan, 12:4 tells us, imo, that both secular and prophetic knowledge will increase in the latter days. The generation that actually sees these things start to be fulfilled will again, imo, have a greater understanding of prophecy than all the previous generations combined. I prefer to believe the...

Sorry but this sounds like the typical historical/preterist eschatology (or lack thereof) run amok!

The temple that will be set up in the near future although to fulfill the prophecies a portable tabernacle would suffice.

He is known by many names and of course the word "antichrist" wouldn't be in the OT. In Daniel, he is the prince to come, the prince of the covenant, the little horn and the willful king. He is described in Dan. 7:24-25, 8:11, 9:27, 11:22-45.

I never claimed it had anything to do w/ 70ad and neither does Dan. 9:27, Prophetically 70ad closes w/ Dan. 9:26b, Dan. 9:26c-27 are speaking of a time after 70 ad. The time of the future kingdoms that my article is based on.

First the temple in heaven is just as real as the temple on earth will be but here ya go...of course you will refute these as your mind is closed but 2 Thess. 2:4 and Rev. 11:1, 2 and since this is speaking prophetically about the same event Dan. 11:31 and 12:11.