Genesis 7:14 "They, and every beast after his kind, and all the cattle after their kind, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind, and every fowl after his kind, every bird of every sort."This includes all animals, and races, of each kind.
Humans are neither beasts, creeping thing, nor fowl. These were terms for what we would call today mammals, reptiles, and birds. Everywhere else in scripture where humans are talked about, it is made clear that they are humans, but not here? We must be careful to read into scripter what is not there. This is the cause of many of the great apostasies.
Genesis 7:15 "And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life."Did you get that? "...two of all flesh," Remember back in Genesis 6:3; "And the Lord said, "My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh,". So we see the races of the sixth day of creation were also here, because God created all flesh, each after their kind, and that means each race would also be aboard the ark.
You need to provide support for the idea that different races are different "kinds" . Until you can do this, this argument means nothing. Also, nowhere does it mention different races being created on the sixth day. If you go back to genesis you will see that only two humans were created at the start and to claim that Eve was created on day six is stretch. (it seems she was created some time later)While on this note, why is it so hard to believe that all races could descend from Noah when all races would have had to descended from Adam?
Modern man would have us believe that "there is no difference in kind, between the races", and today this is accepted in all areas, from marriage and breeding habits, to all forms of mixing.
Show me scripture that says otherwise.
This is exactly what happened in Noah's day,and upon the sounding of that fifth trumpet, of Revelation 9:1, 2, mankind will again be faced by these demonics [fallen angels], also called the "sons of God", parading on the earth and calling themselves human.
If they were fallen angels, how could they be called sons of God? This doctrine is taken from a few words in Genesis 6:1-4. Nowhere else in scripture are angels referred to as sons of God. We latter learn (in the new testament) that this term describes those that follow God. If anything this scripture is referring to the men that had continued to follow God, who were marrying the daughters of non-believers. As a result evil spread and only one man was found to be faithful. This was not an issue of races mixing but believers and non-believers mixing. This is exactly why the Israelites were also admonished to not marry outside of the faith. This doesn't mean that they couldn't marry outside of the race. O other people could become circumcised into the Hebrew faith.
This is why there was a flood to rid the world evil men and the hybrids of Nephelium (fallen angels) and the sons of God. There were giants upon the earth in those days.
There are only two words used in the Bible that come even close to sounding like "Nephelium"Nephaleim is Greek word that refers to the descendents Naphthali (one of the sons of Jacob).Nephil is a Hebrew term that is often translated "giant" (as in Genesis 6:4). The interesting part is that it does not call the children of the sons of God nephil, instead it mentions them separately. Also, nephil means a bully or tyrant. This was a reference to the spreading of evil, not some mix of angel and man.
Not to rid the world of all races
This isn't what we are saying. The purpose of the flood was not to get rid of the races. The purpose of the flood was to get rid of all wicked people. Genesis 6:12 tells us that all flesh had become corrupt abut we also learn that Noah found favor in the site of the Lord (Genesis 6:11). Apparently Noah and his family were the only faithful people left. This is why everyone else was destroyed in the flood.
Are we to assume John the Baptist is lying when he reconizes the kennites/Cannites?
John the Baptist in the scriptures does not mention "kennites". John was talking about Pharisees (descendents of Abraham who was a descendent of Shem). Just because he is talking about a people that do evil things does not mean he is talking about a race, unless of course you can establish this through scriptures.
Are we to assume Gods teaching of the churches of Rev. are wrong?
Once again, a race is not even mentioned here, just people doing bad things. If people that did bad things were all part of the race of kennites then everyone would be.
we can easily pick up the trail of these kennites in exodus,they became the Jewish leaders that wanted Jesus dead.
And how do you trace this trail? The last time I checked all Israelites were descendents of Abraham who descended from Shem, the son of Noah, who was a descendent of Seth, not Cain.
How much of Gods word do we dimiss to make mens fairytales of the Ark only having animals aboard work?
We dismiss nothing, there was more then animals on the Ark. In fact the scripture mentions that there were only eight (II Peter 2:5). The entire point of this scripture (within its context) is that God destroyed all the people that there wicked, sparing only eight. Now if all the kennites are evil as you say and God saved some from the flood as you say then you make God to be a liar.
Have you not read of almost every civilization on earth having records of the flood? and all will tell you of survivors of theirrace whether it be chinese or African.
Yes, because all descended from one man, Noah. There is no scripture to the contrary. Even science attests to the fact that everyone descended from one human ancestor (even though they draw the wrong conclusions from this). Can you show otherwise?
Where did cains wife come from? the land of Nod yes but who populated it? (dont tell me Cain married his sister this is not written it scripture) and it goes against God to force incest upon man.
Son't tell me there were other people, this is not written in scripture. The problems caused by incest (deseases) did not exist until the fall of man and man was not told aginst it until much latter down the line.
the problem is this would take longer than men have been here .
Only if God didn't make it go faster.
And the dogs grow thicker hair yes, but it doesnt change its DNA and the races have slightly different DNA
Actualy, the DNA is different from one species of a Dog to another. Speaking of DNA, science shows that by looking at these slightly different dna sequences in the different races, we can see that all humans have a common ancestor.
and this is evoltion and a Christian can not be an evolutionist.
Actualy I know several Christians that believe in evolution (though I am not one of them), one of which is heavely envolved in evangelism. Even Charles Darwin was a Christian. He never recanted of that faith.
