Let's examine Revelation 20:4 yet again.

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Ziggy

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2020
10,793
9,716
113
61
Maine, USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Female
2Ki 23:5
And he put down the idolatrous priests, whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense in the high places in the cities of Judah, and in the places round about Jerusalem; them also that burned incense unto Baal, to the sun, and to the moon, and to the planets, and to all the host of heaven.
Isa 40:22
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:


I found this interesting:

To fully appreciate Earth’s arc with your own eyes, you must view it from at least 35,000 feet above sea level, an altitude only accessible by plane. In other words, no human living before the 20th century had first-hand experience of our planet’s true shape.

Yet nearly all educated people today recognize this apparent flatness as an illusion. We have a single man to thank for that: the Greek philosopher Aristotle, working in Athens in the 4th century B.C. According to historian James Hannam, author of The Globe: How the Earth Became Round, Aristotle was the first and only person to deduce that, contrary to all common sense, the ground beneath his feet curved imperceptibly.

His discovery then spread, gradually, around the world. “It took over 2,000 years to happen,” Hannam says, “but ultimately everyone from China to America knows the Earth is a globe.”


Hugs
 

ewq1938

Mod
Staff member
Jul 11, 2015
8,510
1,698
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I invite you to state your case.

I spoke about Rome but you didn't address it. They ruled much of Europe, parts of Africa and parts of the middle east. Paul and many others traveled much of this planet so to claim there was no concept of the planet Earth is easily false.




BTW "earth" in the New Testament is typically Greek γη = land.

It also can refer to the whole planet:

Rev 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.

G1093
γῆ
gē
ghay
Contracted from a primary word; soil; by extension a region, or the solid part or the whole of the terrene globe (including the occupants in each application): - country, earth (-ly), ground, land, world.
Total KJV occurrences: 252



"Earth" in the old Testament is typically Hebrew ארץ = land.
It also can mean the whole planet:

H776
אֶרֶץ
'erets
eh'-rets
From an unused root probably meaning to be firm; the earth (at large, or partitively a land): - X common, country, earth, field, ground, land, X nations, way, + wilderness, world.
Total KJV occurrences: 2505



Gen_1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Clearly this is speaking of the whole planet not one area of land because it is contrasted against the heaven.
 
Apr 7, 2026
391
54
28
74
Lexington KY
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Once again: there was no general concept of planet earth in Biblical times.

one webpage says Pythagoras of Samos thought the earth must be round
 
Last edited:
Apr 7, 2026
391
54
28
74
Lexington KY
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Yes, there was. The whole planet is spoken of many times in the bible and people had already traveled to various places around the planet in the NT. Rome was very far away and ruled the middle east and Rome ruled a good portion of the planet.
There was no concept of planet earth, that is common knowledge. If you disagree then I would would be interested to see a reference other than yourself. "Far away" does not equate to "round."
 
Last edited:
Apr 7, 2026
391
54
28
74
Lexington KY
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I spoke about Rome but you didn't address it. They ruled much of Europe, parts of Africa and parts of the middle east. Paul and many others traveled much of this planet so to claim there was no concept of the planet Earth is easily false.






It also can refer to the whole planet:

Rev 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.

G1093
γῆ
gē
ghay
Contracted from a primary word; soil; by extension a region, or the solid part or the whole of the terrene globe (including the occupants in each application): - country, earth (-ly), ground, land, world.
Total KJV occurrences: 252




It also can mean the whole planet:

H776
אֶרֶץ
'erets
eh'-rets
From an unused root probably meaning to be firm; the earth (at large, or partitively a land): - X common, country, earth, field, ground, land, X nations, way, + wilderness, world.
Total KJV occurrences: 2505



Gen_1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Clearly this is speaking of the whole planet not one area of land because it is contrasted against the heaven.
Yes γη can mean both "plant earth" or "land" in modern times--not in Biblical times.
 
Apr 7, 2026
391
54
28
74
Lexington KY
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The *concept* of a round earth wss proposed by Pythagoras and supported by Aristotle and Eratosthenes. IMO that is not a *discovery.*
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Earburner

ewq1938

Mod
Staff member
Jul 11, 2015
8,510
1,698
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The *concept* of a round earth wss proposed by Pythagoras and supported by Aristotle and Eratosthenes. That is not a *discovery.*

Everyone believes the Earth is round. Some believe in a globe, some a flat circle but it's round in both beliefs.
 
Apr 7, 2026
391
54
28
74
Lexington KY
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Revelation 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.


I mainly want to focus on this portion---which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands

A) a time before the millennium begins

B) a time during the millennium

C) a time after the millennium ends

During which of these, A), B) and C), can we assume they are martyred because they did none of these things at the time?

Does it make sense they can be martyred during A) for refusing to do this? Yes.


What about during C)? No.

That leaves B). What about during B) then? No. And here are some reasons why.

In order to be martyred for the reasons they are, it involves everything in Revelation 13 having been fulfilled. Except how could anything in Revelation 13 involve the millennium when both Premil and Amil have satan in the pit during the millennium, and that Amil also has the beast in the pit during the millennium?

Revelation 13:1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.


Does this sound like the beast is still in the pit at this point? Until the beast rises up out of the sea, where is it logically located in the meantime if not in the pit? And why can't 'sea' here simply be code for the bottomless pit? Compare Revelation 13:1 with Revelation 17:3, 8.

Revelation 13:1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up (anabaino) out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns , and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy


Revelation 17:3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns

Revelation 17:8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend (anabaino) out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.



In my opinion, the 10 crowns upon the 10 horns that are all on the head that was wounded and is healed, can be explained per the following. After all, do not crowns and kings go together.

Revelation 17:12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
13 These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
14 These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.
15 And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.
16 And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.
17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.

Based on all of the above, and what else can be added to the OP that hasn't been added yet, how is it reasonable that Amil can be a valid view? Revelation, plus passages elsewhere outside of Revelation, reveal that it
[
The beast rises from the abyss in Revelation 17:8.
No such thing as a 1,000 year millennium on this earth as you've been shown "Several Times"

Jesus returns in fire and final judgement (The End)

"They came to life and ruled with Christ s thousand years." (Revelation 20:4).
 

Earburner

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2019
8,435
1,968
113
76
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Revelation 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.


I mainly want to focus on this portion---which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands

A) a time before the millennium begins

B) a time during the millennium

C) a time after the millennium ends

During which of these, A), B) and C), can we assume they are martyred because they did none of these things at the time?

Does it make sense they can be martyred during A) for refusing to do this? Yes.


What about during C)? No.

That leaves B). What about during B) then? No. And here are some reasons why.

In order to be martyred for the reasons they are, it involves everything in Revelation 13 having been fulfilled. Except how could anything in Revelation 13 involve the millennium when both Premil and Amil have satan in the pit during the millennium, and that Amil also has the beast in the pit during the millennium?

Revelation 13:1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.


Does this sound like the beast is still in the pit at this point? Until the beast rises up out of the sea, where is it logically located in the meantime if not in the pit? And why can't 'sea' here simply be code for the bottomless pit? Compare Revelation 13:1 with Revelation 17:3, 8.

Revelation 13:1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up (anabaino) out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns , and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy


Revelation 17:3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns

Revelation 17:8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend (anabaino) out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.



In my opinion, the 10 crowns upon the 10 horns that are all on the head that was wounded and is healed, can be explained per the following. After all, do not crowns and kings go together.

Revelation 17:12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
13 These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
14 These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.
15 And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.
16 And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.
17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.

Based on all of the above, and what else can be added to the OP that hasn't been added yet, how is it reasonable that Amil can be a valid view? Revelation, plus passages elsewhere outside of Revelation, reveal that it is the 42 month reign of the beast that precede the 2nd coming. Therefore, in order for Amil to be a valid position, the 42 month reign of the beast must occur during satan's little season. But how can it when Revelation 20:4 already reveals that the 42 month reign of thebeast precede satan's little season?
First and foremost the book of Revelation is not to be read and understood strictly in a chronological order. It's a prophetic book from God the Father's thoughts about the Past, Present and Future, all at the same time.

Therefore, of what we read from out of Revelation, our unaided, linear thinking human mind can only think it's own thoughts about what we are reading. But, that is not how God actually thinks about a situation that WAS in the past,  IS NOW at the moment, or SHALL BE in the future.
So then, without the mind of Christ within us, we have no hope to understand His thoughts or His ways about His Prophetic words, and the reality that we all shall live in..
Isa. 55:8-9 "My thoughts are not your thoughts...."

We won't receive a clear understanding about the 42 months, if we view it through the lense of church- ianity's indoctrinated rendition of "The Millennium", as being a futuristic time zone of a literal period of "a thousand years".

Amillennialists understand that this present Age of God's Grace, through faith in Christ, is the symbolic period of "a thousand years". 2 Peter 3:8-9.

The two prophetic points in question are the 1260 days and the 42 mos., which are two different time periods.
The 1260 days is in reference to the joint ministry of the Two Anointed Ones (Zech. 4:14), aka "MY Two Witnesses" of Rev. 11:3-4, who were John the Baptist and Jesus. (John for 6 mos + Jesus for 3.0 yrs.= 1260 days).
Rev. 11:3-4 And I will give power unto MY two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore [1260] days, clothed in sackcloth.
4 These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth. [Zech. 4:11-14].
Did you know that for ALL time and ALL people, the ONLY persons who ever had the Holy Spirit at birth, was John and Jesus!


From that point in time, after the 1260 days, began the symbolic period of "a thousand years" of God's Grace to all the world, through having faith in the Lord Jesus.

In the proximity of 2030 years later (+/-), the 42 mos. is strictly going to be about-
1. the 2H Beast (the USA);
2. the 10H beast (EU/NATO, aka the remnants of the Roman Empire);
3. the Image of the 10H Beast, the United Nations, shall "speak and cause"/enforce the application of "The Mark of the Beast". Rev. 13:15

The 42 mos. is all about the Beast's systems of rulership (1,2&3 altogether), and it is for "a short time".
It is God's allotment of 3.5 years of time to satan, as being the same allotment of time that satan allowed for God's "Two Anointed Ones", during the 70th week, as prophesied of in Daniel 9:24-27, concerning the Messiah being cutoff in the midst of that 70th week (Crucified).
Isa. 55:8-9
8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord.
9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.
 
Last edited:
Apr 7, 2026
391
54
28
74
Lexington KY
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
>I spoke about Rome but you didn't address it. They ruled much of Europe, parts of Africa and parts of the middle east. Paul and many others traveled much of this planet so to claim there was no concept of the planet Earth is easily false.>

Romans traveled in the Middle East, not all around the planet.

The Apostle Paul was a Roman citizen, since he was born in the Roman colony of Tarsus. Paul traveled in the Middle East.

>It also can refer to the whole planet>

Personally I have been to Europe, Israel, China, all by commercial jet plane. Today we know the "earth" is a globe.

People in the time we are discussing did not have jet planes, hence they had no was of knowing that the earth is a globe.
 
Last edited:
Apr 7, 2026
391
54
28
74
Lexington KY
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
>I spoke about Rome but you didn't address it. They ruled much of Europe, parts of Africa and parts of the middle east. Paul and many others traveled much of this planet so to claim there was no concept of the planet Earth is easily false.>

Romans traveled in the Middle East, not all around the planet.

The Apostle Paul was a Roman citizen, since he was born in the Roman colony of Tarsus. Paul traveled in the Middle East.

>It also can refer to the whole planet>

Personally I have been to Europe, Israel, China, all by commercial jet plane. Today we know the "earth" is a globe.

People in the time we are discussing did not have jet planes, hence they had no way of knowing that the earth is a globe. "Suspecting" does not equate to "knowing."
 

Earburner

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2019
8,435
1,968
113
76
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
>I spoke about Rome but you didn't address it. They ruled much of Europe, parts of Africa and parts of the middle east. Paul and many others traveled much of this planet so to claim there was no concept of the planet Earth is easily false.>

Romans traveled in the Middle East, not all around the planet.

The Apostle Paul was a Roman citizen, since he was born in the Roman colony of Tarsus. Paul traveled in the Middle East.

>It also can refer to the whole planet>

Personally I have been to Europe, Israel, China, all by commercial jet plane. Today we know the "earth" is a globe.

People in the time we are discussing did not have jet planes, hence they had no was of knowing that the earth is a globe.
No one at the time of the Roman Empire knew anything of what shape the earth was, whether it was flat or a globe.

It's somewhat of a moot point, since factually we all now know the Earth is a Globe.
So then for those who are promoting the forever fictitious fallacy of a flat earth, it is darn sure fact they have no idea what Binocculars are, or how a Telescope works.
No one then had the science or the technology to measure the earth, or view it from an aerial distance for a visual observation.

I wasn't ignoring your view about the beginnings of the Roman Empire and forwarding to the historic day of Jesus Crucifixion/Resurrection, and then the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem. Yes, all that happened while the Roman Empire was in power, as being the prophetic 4th Beast of Daniel 7
 
  • Like
Reactions: William Barton
Apr 7, 2026
391
54
28
74
Lexington KY
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The claim is:

>No such thing as a 1,000 year millennium on this earth as you've been shown "Several Times">

English " millennium" stems from Latin:

mille =1000
+
annum = year

Hence 1000 years.

See Revelation 20:1-6, "one thousand years."