How can the body of Christ function properly without eyes and ears?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I never said the Scripture was "the source of our being." I said it is the only means we have by which we can properly discern how God used prophets throughout history. If your argument is that you have personal experience from God himself that somehow changes what Scripture teaches about what prophets do, then I am afraid I cannot go down that road with you. I am accountable to what God has said to me in his Word, not to what you claim to have experienced. I am not discounting your experiences, but they cannot be a sufficient guide for me, especially when I feel they are contrary to what the Bible explicitly teaches on this matter.

Why is it that any appeal to Scripture on these issues is met with some sort of attack about how the "scholars" killed Jesus? These "scholars" also rejected Jesus. I do not reject Jesus. There is NOTHING wrong with searching the Word of God. Paul did so with the "noble" Bereans. Paul didn't say, "Hey Bereans, you better listen to me because I am an Apostle and I have authority...and it doesn't matter if you agree or not." No, he showed that his teaching was in line with the Word of God.

So, if what you are teaching is true, then it should be in line with the Word. So I am simply asking you to explain why my understanding of the prophetic is wrong from a Scriptural perspective. The Pharisees did not disagree with Jesus about the meaning of Scripture. Rather, the Pharisees often applauded Jesus' answers when they questioned him about the heart of the Scriptures. Where they were at odds was when Jesus ran counter to their traditions (overly rigid Sabbath views, hand washing, and hanging out with "sinners"). Ultimately, their primary sin was rejecting their need of repentance. cleansing and God's grace in Jesus. I do not do these things..nor do any Christian scholars. So I would hesitate in using analogies that imply these folks to be hypocritical, Messiah-murdering Pharisees. It is both incredibly harsh and untrue.

P.S. I never referred to any theologian or "seminary student" in my understanding of a prophet. I referenced Scripture. My understanding is based in Scripture...as I mentioned previously.
 

michaelvpardo

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2011
4,204
1,734
113
67
East Stroudsburg, PA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Wormwood said:
P.S. I never referred to any theologian or "seminary student" in my understanding of a prophet. I referenced Scripture. My understanding is based in Scripture...as I mentioned previously.
We've gone down that road before in discussions about the Millennial reign of Christ and in those cases you simply ignored scripture that doesn't fit your theology. So do you really want me to give you a list of passages which demonstrate the works of the prophets that have little or at times nothing to do with the revelation of God? What exactly would be the point?
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Michael,

I am not talking merely about actions of prophets, but a biblical definition of what a prophet is and does. At what point is someone declared to be a prophet in the Bible? This is the issue that I think you need to explore more deeply. Prophets did lots of things, but those things do not make them prophets. For instance, prophets did miracles but that is not always the case with prophets. Some prophets were priests, but not all. Some were shepherds. My point is that pointing to a prophet's action does not define the term for us. In my estimation, the key element in every designation of a prophet in the Old and New Testaments is a declaration from God to that person with a specific message for that person to carry to His people. Understand, that people were given the supernatural ability to prophesy on occasion, but that did not classify them as prophets. Saul prophesied. Even the unbelieving High Priest prophesied that Jesus would die for the people.

However, the office of a prophet is almost always established by a very clear and often audible call from God with a specific message to communicate to His people. The prophet Isaiah was given a vision of the heavenly throne room and told to go and speak to the people until the nation was laid waste. The prophet Samuel heard the audible voice of God who spoke to him and set him apart as a prophet. We don't know anything about the initial call of Elijah, but he clearly received direct insight from God and was empowered to do miraculous signs and wonders. Daniel received specific revelation on dream and spoke with angelic messengers. Jonah was audibly told by God to go to Ninevah and preach a particular message. Hosea was specifically told by God to marry a prostitute and was given a specific message in relation to this action. Habakkuk received an audible message from God and was told to write a specific message. Amos was a shepherd who heard God speak to him and was given a message to deliver to the people. John the Baptist was chosen at birth and was given a specific message to preach. He even said God told him that he would see the Spirit descend as a dove on the Messiah.

I could go on and on through pretty much every prophet in the Bible and find the same theme. Obviously with some, we do not have specifics of their calling or how they received the message, but on all the ones we do see something specific written about it...the message is the same. A vision, messenger or audible voice spoke to the person and gave them a particular message and task for a specific people.

Moreover, perhaps more striking is what we see in how God denounces false prophets. It seems clear biblically that someone could not possibly be confused about whether or not they are a prophet. Consider the following verses...
“The word of the Lord came to me: “Son of man, prophesy against the prophets of Israel, who are prophesying, and say to those who prophesy from their own hearts: ‘Hear the word of the Lord!’"...
“They have seen false visions and lying divinations. They say, ‘Declares the Lord,’ when the Lord has not sent them, and yet they expect him to fulfill their word. Have you not seen a false vision and uttered a lying divination, whenever you have said, ‘Declares the Lord,’ although I have not spoken?”” (Ezekiel 13:1-2, 6–7, ESV)
““I did not send the prophets, yet they ran; I did not speak to them, yet they prophesied.” (Jeremiah 23:21, ESV)
So clearly, God defines a true prophet as one who has actually heard His voice and had received a specific message and commission from him. So again, I ask you if you have received such an audible message or vision from God.
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well, there is that, and many times the Scripture actually says, "I heard a voice..." Samuel heard a voice calling to him continually that he thought was Eli. Many of them saw visions, were visited by angelic messengers or had other experiences that were undeniable. We simply do not hear of prophets speaking out of an inner gut feeling or strong impressions. Again, I think the rebuke against the false prophets is that they DID operate this way. They spoke out of their imaginations rather than from a direct message from God. I think this distinguishes between inner feelings and a clear and specific voice from God.
 

michaelvpardo

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2011
4,204
1,734
113
67
East Stroudsburg, PA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Wormwood said:
Well, there is that, and many times the Scripture actually says, "I heard a voice..." Samuel heard a voice calling to him continually that he thought was Eli. Many of them saw visions, were visited by angelic messengers or had other experiences that were undeniable. We simply do not hear of prophets speaking out of an inner gut feeling or strong impressions. Again, I think the rebuke against the false prophets is that they DID operate this way. They spoke out of their imaginations rather than from a direct message from God. I think this distinguishes between inner feelings and a clear and specific voice from God.
Then perhaps your seriously mistaken. Samuel heard a voice calling him, but Eli never heard that same voice and told Samuel how to respond to it. Nothing says that the voice was audible and everything suggests that it wasn't. No one prophesies by gut feelings: feelings are emotions, not thoughts (though some people will call their thoughts feelings: they're just confused). All Prophesy comes through thought and will. Jonah heard the word of the Lord and refused to go to Nineveh, but instead caught a boat in the other direction. God had to put him in the belly of a fish to change his will.
Elijah was a prophet and recognized among the Jews as one of the greatest of the prophets, but nothing in scripture tells us that he heard an audible voice from God until after his victory over the prophets of Baal and while he was hiding in a cave:
9. And there he went into a cave, and spent the night in that place; and behold, the word of the Lord came to him, and He said to him, "What are you doing here, Elijah?''
10. So he said, "I have been very zealous for the Lord God of hosts; for the children of Israel have forsaken Your covenant, torn down Your altars, and killed Your prophets with the sword. I alone am left; and they seek to take my life.''
11. Then He said, "Go out, and stand on the mountain before the Lord.'' And behold, the Lord passed by, and a great and strong wind tore into the mountains and broke the rocks in pieces before the Lord, but the Lord was not in the wind; and after the wind an earthquake, but the Lord was not in the earthquake; 12. and after the earthquake a fire, but the Lord was not in the fire; and after the fire a still small voice. 13. So it was, when Elijah heard it, that he wrapped his face in his mantle and went out and stood in the entrance of the cave. And suddenly a voice came to him, and said, "What are you doing here, Elijah?'' 1 Kings 19:9-13
Prior to this passage the scripture tells us that "the word of the Lord came to him," not that God spoke audibly to him. These events could've been appearances of the pre-incarnate Christ, but the scripture doesn't describe him as having been visited by a man or someone in the appearance of a man (though it does relate his encounter with an angel so you would expect to hear as much when the word of the Lord came to him and yet it doesn't.) On the contrary, in one of the first chapters to mention him, chapter 17, the widow from Zarephath said to him, "Now by this I know that you are a man of God, and that the word of the Lord in your mouth is the truth.''
In other words, when the word of the Lord came to him, it was the spirit of prophesy, the Holy Spirit, speaking through him and to him.
What do the New Testament scriptures say?
And I fell at his feet to worship him. But he said to me, "See that you do not do that! I am your fellow servant, and of your brethren who have the testimony of Jesus. Worship God! For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.'' Revelation 19:10
He who believes in the Son of God has the witness in himself; he who does not believe God has made Him a liar, because he has not believed the testimony that God has given of His Son. And this is the testimony: that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son. He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life. 1 John 5:10-12
Do you get that those who have been born again of His Spirit (have received the Holy Spirit through faith in the Son of God, the redemption in His blood, and the testimony of His resurrection) all have the witness of God within themselves, because the witness of God is the Holy Spirit, and this same Spirit who is God with us and in us, is the Spirit of prophecy? Everyone who is born again of His Spirit has within themselves the Spirit of prophecy and any of them may utter prophesy, but God calls those according to His purpose, equips them according to His plan, and places them according to His will. What right do you have to limit God by pulling a verse out of context about the foundations of the church? Do you really believe that the church is complete and perfected?
What does the scripture say?
And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, till we all come to the unity of the faith and the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; that we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness by which they lie in wait to deceive, but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head Christ from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love. Ephesians 4:11-16
I've heard John MacArthur make the argument that if prophets existed today, then the words that they said would have the same weight as scripture, and this to rationalize away the gift of prophesy and make it of no effect. His problem, like yours, is that he doesn't believe all that the scripture says, specifically denying those parts that he doesn't like in order to preserve his authority and that of scripture (rather convenient for pastors and teachers to deny the gifts given to those that they would have to answer to when in error.) I'm telling you now, that he has a problem. In selectively denying parts of scripture (through personal rationalizations) he opposes Christ and puts himself in the place of the adversary. Peter did as much at times, but sin is sin and when you choose to make war upon God, even with what you believe to be good intention, you're going to loose. You do have to love people who fight for the integrity of the scripture, yet choose to deny what it says. They're just blinded by their own sin, but God will work all these things out soon enough.
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Michael,

Thanks for your reply and sharing your views through Scripture.

Then perhaps your seriously mistaken. Samuel heard a voice calling him, but Eli never heard that same voice and told Samuel how to respond to it. Nothing says that the voice was audible and everything suggests that it wasn't.

...Elijah was a prophet and recognized among the Jews as one of the greatest of the prophets, but nothing in scripture tells us that he heard an audible voice from God until after his victory over the prophets of Baal and while he was hiding in a cave
I think it is a very safe thing to claim that when the Lord speaks to someone or it is said that the Lord "said" that it means he spoke. If I said, "Michael said, 'I am a prophet.'" then you and all of creation would assume I am claiming you spoke those words audibly and not that your telepathically put those thoughts in my head. I do not think any of those verses refute my point. Rather, I think they substantiate them. These are just more instances of God actually speaking, visiting and at times whispering. It is abundantly clear that God's message was so absolutely clear and vivid that they often were told to write something word for word. It never says, "A strong thought entered Isaiah's mind" or "the Spirit brought strong unction to Isaiah and he said." No, what is clear is that a verbal message of specific words was given that was to be communicated exactly as it was given. In fact, Moses was "told" to speak to the rock but he struck it instead which caused him to not enter the promised land due to his disobedience. Moreover, I don't think we should make arguments about such matters based on what Scripture doesn't say in relation to Elijah.

You make a good point that Eli did not hear the voice. This could be because it was not loud enough to for him to hear it where he was in relation to Samuel when God was speaking. However, more likely is that God makes his voice only heard by those whom he wants to receive the message. We see this on the Damascus road with Paul. Jesus spoke to Paul but those with Paul did not hear anything. This does NOT mean that Paul did not really hear a voice. Rather, it means ONLY Paul heard the voice.

How can you say "All prophecy comes through thought and will"? You just quoted Scriptures of God proclaiming a message to his prophets by a voice or a messenger. Rather, the false prophets prophesied out of their "imagination." Imaginations come from thought and will. This is not to say that God cannot use our thought and will. Certainly God can give us impressions and we can be sensitive to the Spirit in these things. My point is that this is not what the prophets operated from when they declared, "Thus SAYETH the Lord."

Prior to this passage the scripture tells us that "the word of the Lord came to him," not that God spoke audibly to him. These events could've been appearances of the pre-incarnate Christ, but the scripture doesn't describe him as having been visited by a man or someone in the appearance of a man (though it does relate his encounter with an angel so you would expect to hear as much when the word of the Lord came to him and yet it doesn't.) On the contrary, in one of the first chapters to mention him, chapter 17, the widow from Zarephath said to him, "Now by this I know that you are a man of God, and that the word of the Lord in your mouth is the truth.''
I think this also makes my point. How did the widow hear the "word of the Lord" that was in the mouth of Elijah? Probably because he spoke audibly those words. She heard his words and saw his works and determined that the declarations he made from God were real and true. So if the woman knew the word of the Lord from the mouth of Elijah by his proclamation, why would we assume the "word of the Lord" that came to Elijah was not audible? I really don't understand your connection here. You will need to clarify this for me because it seems to me that it substantiates what I am getting at: the "word of the Lord" is a declared message that is heard audibly.

And I fell at his feet to worship him. But he said to me, "See that you do not do that! I am your fellow servant, and of your brethren who have the testimony of Jesus. Worship God! For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.'' Revelation 19:10
Again, I think that this also substantiates my point I made from Hebrews 1. All prophecy now is centered on the testimony of Jesus. In the past, God spoke to the forefathers through prophets and in these last days he has spoken through his Son. The prophets that existed in the first century have given testimony to the life and work of Jesus. We now have that testimony. That was their prophetic message along with the message of the Apostles who bodily walked with Jesus and observed his life, message and resurrection.

Finally, you have me pegged wrong. I am not a cessationist, I don't base my views off MacArthur and I don't use 1 Cor 13 as rationale for my perspective on prophecy. Lets deal with what each other says, and not what we assume they believe.

In any event, the Apostles and prophets laid a foundation with the cornerstone being Christ. That foundation does not need to be laid again and there is no new message from you regarding the testimony of Jesus that was previously left unspoken. The Apostles and prophets are still speaking today through the writings of the NT and that is what pastors, teachers, and evangelists expound upon in order to build people up into maturity. Paul said clearly to the Ephesian elders in Acts 20 that he had "not hesitated to proclaim to you the WHOLE will of God." The foundation is laid and we are to build off it.

“But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction.” (2 Peter 2:1, ESV)
Notice the shift from focusing on false prophets to false teachers. I think this clearly shows that the role of the prophet has been fulfilled in the testimony of Christ and now the emphasis has shifted to what is being taught about the foundation that has been once and for all passed down to the saints.
 

michaelvpardo

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2011
4,204
1,734
113
67
East Stroudsburg, PA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Wormwood said:
Michael,

Thanks for your reply and sharing your views through Scripture.


I think it is a very safe thing to claim that when the Lord speaks to someone or it is said that the Lord "said" that it means he spoke. If I said, "Michael said, 'I am a prophet.'" then you and all of creation would assume I am claiming you spoke those words audibly and not that your telepathically put those thoughts in my head.
First of all, you're a man and not God; we communicate the way that we do because we were designed this way by our creator, but God is Spirit: "God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.'' John 4:24
Let me engage you in similar folly: A spirit does not have vocal cords, nor any material substance. Sound waves are physical, cyclical variations in air pressure which vary in frequency and amplitude, and must have a physical causative agent. By your own reasoning, God can't speak.
BTW, I have met individuals who claim that they can put thoughts in your head and exert a measure of control over a person with their minds. Since those individuals were unable to do so to me, I would still have to say that such an assertion was unproven, but one of these individuals definitely wasn't your average "crack pot," rather he was a young University student and room mate (for a short period of time) that was both a Mathematics and Electrical Engineering major adept in his studies. I have also, prior to receiving Christ as my savior, known a number of women who were able to make at least some individuals experience physical sensations without coming into any contact with them, partially through visual stimuli but most definitely through force of will. Also, a young self professed psychic was able to do so without any visual or auditory stimuli and proved as much to my satisfaction. I know that such phenomena are associated with demonic influences, but I'm convinced that God has built us with the capability to experience such spiritual phenomenon (through my own experience.) The degree to which individuals are capable of such experience may vary, but it certainly is something created as we can't acquire that which God hasn't created: He has created all things (by definition.)

Wormwood said:
Michael,

Thanks for your reply and sharing your views through Scripture.


It never says, "A strong thought entered Isaiah's mind" or "the Spirit brought strong unction to Isaiah and he said." No, what is clear is that a verbal message of specific words was given that was to be communicated exactly as it was given.
The scripture doesn't say this because it doesn't have to. All people hear a voice or more than one in their heads. It's usually referred to as internal dialog and is part of the way that we think. Every time you write something (unless your an "auto writer") You formulate words in your head and typically the voice within your mind will sound like your own. I can say this because I know immediately when the voice in my head is not my own voice. People say that if you hear voices when someone isn't there, that you're crazy, but everyone has internal dialogue (and its difficult for most people to shut off, which is why men have developed forms of meditation to "still the mind.")
Does God do this?
"Father, glorify Your name.'' Then a voice came from heaven, saying, "I have both glorified it and will glorify it again.'' Therefore the people who stood by and heard it said that it had thundered. Others said, "An angel has spoken to Him.'' John 12:28-29
John, the author of this gospel, obviously heard God speak clearly and understood what was said, however other's present only heard thunder and some assumed that an angel was speaking to Christ. Those others that believed Jesus was spoken to by an angel either couldn't have understood what was "spoken" or had an incredibly ignorant theology. Since God has no mouth and understanding his voice is a selective thing, then hearing Him has a strictly spiritual element to it. Spirit speaks to spirit as deep calls to deep. What does the Apostle Paul say about spiritual communication?
Likewise the Spirit also helps in our weaknesses. For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit Himself makes intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. Romans 8:26
You could argue that "groanings" are audible, but if they aren't uttered, how then are they spoken?

Wormwood said:
Michael,


We see this on the Damascus road with Paul. Jesus spoke to Paul but those with Paul did not hear anything. This does NOT mean that Paul did not really hear a voice. Rather, it means ONLY Paul heard the voice.
Not really, read the scripture again:
And the men who journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice but seeing no one. Acts 9:7
I made the same error when considering my first response, but you should check the text before making it an argument.




  • How can you say "All prophecy comes through thought and will"? You just quoted Scriptures of God proclaiming a message to his prophets by a voice or a messenger. Rather, the false prophets prophesied out of their "imagination." Imaginations come from thought and will. This is not to say that God cannot use our thought and will. Certainly God can give us impressions and we can be sensitive to the Spirit in these things. My point is that this is not what the prophets operated from when they declared, "Thus SAYETH the Lord."
Pardon the change in quoting method, but the online editor used here is "for the birds."





I can say this because it is both factual and true. No one speaks without a mind. The scripture tells us through the person of Jesus Christ, that God is able to make the rocks speak, but they don't for simple physical reasons: Rocks don't have mouths and even if they did, they don't have minds. If a person doesn't have a mind and still speaks, then the person isn't the one speaking. Generally we also must use will to speak. I understand that there are people who speak uncontrollably, according to them, but speech remains a function of the speech center of the brain and ultimately all speech is through the mind if not through the will, and again if it isn't through the will, then it isn't spoken by the speaker. Everything we do, we do by act of will. You can think the thought "get up out of this chair," but you won't move unless you activate your will to do so. BTW the topic has nothing to do with false prophets; that appears to be your ongoing accusation of anyone who claims to have received Christ's gift.

Wormwood said:
Michael,


I think this also makes my point. How did the widow hear the "word of the Lord" that was in the mouth of Elijah? Probably because he spoke audibly those words. She heard his words and saw his works and determined that the declarations he made from God were real and true. So if the woman knew the word of the Lord from the mouth of Elijah by his proclamation, why would we assume the "word of the Lord" that came to Elijah was not audible? I really don't understand your connection here. You will need to clarify this for me because it seems to me that it substantiates what I am getting at: the "word of the Lord" is a declared message that is heard audibly.
Of course he spoke them audibly, but what the widow actually said was that the word of the Lord was in the prophet's mouth, not that God spoke audibly, but that the prophet spoke God's word audibly: God's word was in Elijah's mouth. This is spiritual, the word of God coming from the mouth of the prophet. This is why John MacArthur makes the dubious claim that everything a prophet speaks must have the same weight as scripture if prophets still existed. Its a false assertion because it equates the prophet's mind and will with God. Prophets speak words from God by the will of God and prophets speak their own words by their own will. Even if they formulate their speech according to a vision that they have seen from God, their speech remains an expression of God's will, though not necessarily a direct representation of His word. This is understood and accepted by biblical scholars such as RC Sproul, understanding that the prophets speak from their own cultural context, though they don't necessarily understand what they've said. The interpretation may remain outside of their context, especially when speaking of the distant future.
to answer your question "why would we assume the "word of the Lord" that came to Elijah was not audible?" See the first part of my response. e.g. God (the Father) is spirit and spirit is non physical.
Wormwood said:
Michael,


All prophecy now is centered on the testimony of Jesus.
This is your assertion, not that of scripture.
Wormwood said:
Michael,

The prophets that existed in the first century have given testimony to the life and work of Jesus. We now have that testimony. That was their prophetic message along with the message of the Apostles who bodily walked with Jesus and observed his life, message and resurrection.
Good attempt but not scripturally accurate.
When he had come to us, he took Paul's belt, bound his own hands and feet, and said, "Thus says the Holy Spirit, `So shall the Jews at Jerusalem bind the man who owns this belt, and deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles.' '' Acts 21:11
This prophesy was not made about Jesus or in reference to Jesus, but was given to an assembly about the fate of Paul when he would travel to Jerusalem.
Wormwood said:
Michael,

Finally, you have me pegged wrong. I am not a cessationist, I don't base my views off MacArthur and I don't use 1 Cor 13 as rationale for my perspective on prophecy. Lets deal with what each other says, and not what we assume they believe.
I haven't pegged you as anything except as being not particularly facile with scripture nor particularly informed about the physical nature of creation. I used JM as an example because of shared arguments, which are not unique to you or him or a particular point of view. I was only trying to be gentle in pointing out your errors by using an intermediary example, but if you prefer that I "attack" your point of view, what does that say about your pride? This isn't a private conversation, but public and I guarantee that ideas, thoughts, expressions, and truth expressed in this venue find their way to other venues and the eyes of people far removed from the conversation.
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Let me engage you in similar folly: A spirit does not have vocal cords, nor any material substance. Sound waves are physical, cyclical variations in air pressure which vary in frequency and amplitude, and must have a physical causative agent. By your own reasoning, God can't speak.
By my own reasoning? When did I say God cant do something? Certainly God can speak as he created the mouth. God can create sound waves, and as the Bible is evidently clear, people distinctly hear him speak with a voice many times throughout scripture. I don't know what you are driving at here. In any event, my point is that a prophet very distinctly hears God powerfully communicate a very specific message for a specific purpose for a specific people. If you have not received that, then you are not a prophet. I hear people using their impressions all the times as rationale to declare themselves to be prophets, apostles or declare "thus sayeth the Lord." A very dangerous proposition in my mind. I would not want to be in the shoes of someone who stands before the Lord and has to account for claiming God said something he didn't say. Again, there is a difference between having a thought "pop" in your head from nowhere (which happens to me regularly, but not because it is God or I am a prophet) and hearing God "say" something to me.
Not really, read the scripture again:
And the men who journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice but seeing no one. Acts 9:7
I made the same error when considering my first response, but you should check the text before making it an argument.
I did read the Scripture and it says,
“Now those who were with me saw the light but did not understand the voice of the one who was speaking to me.” (Acts 22:9, ESV)
So they heard a sound (I misspoke there), but the point I was trying to make was that they were unable to understand what was being said to Paul. God clearly was focusing his message in a way directed at Paul and obscure to those around him. In any event, my point stands. God can use sound or even visions in a way that they are not prevalent to those around the person having the experience. But the point, again, is still very prominent in my mind. God used actual sounds that impacted Paul's eardrums and the eardrums of those around him (although it was understandable to Paul and appears to be masked to the others and the same is true with the "voice" that spoke to Jesus from heaven. It was a real voice even though not understandable by some. Have you heard such a voice?).

Everything we do, we do by act of will. You can think the thought "get up out of this chair," but you won't move unless you activate your will to do so. BTW the topic has nothing to do with false prophets; that appears to be your ongoing accusation of anyone who claims to have received Christ's gift.
Michael, I choose to believe the Scriptures as they are written. When it says, "God said" I believe it was something that is communicated in the same manner as we understand someone "saying" something. Especially when there are numerous situations that show audible sound was involved in the speaking. Why should we assume that this is not usually true when we are given very specific details of sound, people hearing voices and the voices are so prominent and clear that it is assumed someone in another room is speaking to them? All this stuff about "will" and so forth is really outside of how the Bible actually reads. This is your slant on what it means, but its not what is actually written. When the Bible says, "God spoke," "God said," "The voice of the Lord..." or "the word of the Lord came saying..." I have no reason to believe this is anything but something that is distinctly audible..especially when we see confirmation of that through multiple narratives in Scripture.

I am not saying you are a false prophet or that anyone who claims to be a prophet is a false prophet (perhaps just in error about what a prophet really is). I am saying that the false prophets spoke out of their imaginations rather than responding to the specific declaration of God. For me, this further clarifies that God's speaking was very distinct and powerfully audible so that there could be no confusion. The false prophets were "imagining" things whereas the real prophets were having legitimate conversations with the Almighty. So, I think this makes it clear, biblically, that one cannot "think" they are a prophet or find their calling as a prophet because someone else tells them they are. They are a prophet because God speaks a very clear message to them to communicate to a group of people. That is my point. I apologize if you took it that I am calling you a false prophet. I am saying, the Bible makes a clear definition of what a true prophet is by how it defines a false prophet (true prophet = heard God's voice, false prophet = spoke out of inner imagination and ended up contradicting God's true message). So again, I ask, "Have you heard a distinct and specific message to communicate to a group of people from God himself?"

Yes, God's Word was in Elijah's mouth. God's word is always communicated either through the written word or the spoken word. That is precisely my point. Why would we think that when Elijah heard God's word given to him it was any different than the woman who heard God's word through Elijah? I agree that the word of God was shaped through the speaking agent and their historical context. God speaks through people and in history. Can you reference where you are getting this information from RC Sproul and others? This sounds like discussion on the inspiration of Scripture rather than God's message being communicated through the prophets. I see these as two different issues.
 

michaelvpardo

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2011
4,204
1,734
113
67
East Stroudsburg, PA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Wormwood said:
Michael,


In any event, the Apostles and prophets laid a foundation with the cornerstone being Christ. That foundation does not need to be laid again and there is no new message from you regarding the testimony of Jesus that was previously left unspoken. The Apostles and prophets are still speaking today through the writings of the NT and that is what pastors, teachers, and evangelists expound upon in order to build people up into maturity. Paul said clearly to the Ephesian elders in Acts 20 that he had "not hesitated to proclaim to you the WHOLE will of God." The foundation is laid and we are to build off it.
You apparently don't understand much about construction either. A foundation is not a building. We (the body of Christ) are that building spoken of in the scripture that you referenced that is being built up and the builder is neither I nor you, but Christ. You have no right to limit what Christ does with His body, nor does any man, and I promise you that you will be held accountable. All you've made as an argument is assertion founded with bits and pieces of scripture pulled from context and then misapplied to reality. Has it occurred to you that although Paul didn't hesitate to proclaim the "WHOLE will of God" as you've written it, the scripture doesn't contain the "Whole" proclamation of Paul the Apostle? This isn't conjecture, but fact. We know that Paul wrote epistles which didn't survive to our time (or were intentionally kept from the collection we know as the Bible) and we know that not every teaching of Paul (or of any of the Apostles) is preserved in writing for our benefit. And who was it that would have destroyed the writings of the Apostles? Do you think that when a letter was written, that one copy was passed about through all the congregations of the known world?
Would you have destroyed a letter from Paul or John or Peter or James, or any of the Apostles for that matter? I don't need to go to wild conjecture about this, but part of our reasoning of the completion of the Canon of scripture includes the notion that God has preserved His word Sovereignly and so we say that it is complete. With the discovery of the dead sea scrolls a great deal of scripture was uncovered as handmade copies dating from a much earlier time than any other manuscripts available during the "finalization of the canon." Does this mean that any non canonical works are uninspired? I've read at least one apocryphal work that appears to give testimony of the person of Jesus Christ, yet was written before His birth. Was it uninspired?

I asked you a question in the course of another discussion which you never really answered. Why "wormwood?" Why have you chosen the name of a "fallen star" as your username?

Wormwood said:
Michael, I choose to believe the Scriptures as they are written. When it says, "God said" I believe it was something that is communicated in the same manner as we understand someone "saying" something. Especially when there are numerous situations that show audible sound was involved in the speaking. Why should we assume that this is not usually true when we are given very specific details of sound, people hearing voices and the voices are so prominent and clear that it is assumed someone in another room is speaking to them? All this stuff about "will" and so forth is really outside of how the Bible actually reads. This is your slant on what it means, but its not what is actually written.
So do you now or have you ever drank Jesus' blood? Do you now or have you ever eaten Jesus' flesh? God can do whatever He wants according to His will, including make rocks speak, my point was that you were making an argument from the physical to the spiritual. Your reasoning, and that given in my example were both purely carnal in nature. I'm not saying that this is bad, because we are first natural creatures, but when we have His Spirit, having been born again of Him, we become spiritual beings or perhaps we might say spiritually alive beings as opposed to spiritually dead beings. Unsaved people frequently experience spiritual phenomena, but are unable to interpret it because they remain spiritually dead. I haven't said that you are (unsaved or spiritually dead,) but you don't appear to be particularly spiritually perceptive. This can be from a lack of "giftedness" or from simple obstinacy. The latter is sin. If this dialogue continues long enough, all will be revealed, and I'm here primarily to help.

I ask the reader to forgive me for resorting to "brow beating" as it remains a low form of argument, but our friendly "moderator" clearly has an agenda to shut down all such types of discussion with dogmatic assertion common to the theologically erudite and scholarly elite. Everyone here has a vested interest in biblical study, but let's be honest about it and try not to divide the study of scripture from the real world as though it were merely mental construct. This discussion was meant to pose a question about a serious problem which obviously has serious consequences in the western world. If God were not so conveniently shoved into a box (or a book), the church in the west would not be so conveniently able to shelve Him. The fact of the matter is that our characterization of the Lord and of His works is at best a profoundly limited one due to our limited nature, and our attempt to restrict our creator to our understanding of Him is the epitome of foolhardiness.
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
“So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone, in whom the whole structure, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord. In him you also are being built together into a dwelling place for God by the Spirit.” (Ephesians 2:19–22, ESV)
This was the scripture I was referencing. My point is the foundation is laid. Nothing more than that. I am not limiting Christ. I am reflecting on what the Word of God teaches. Why is it that because I disagree with what a prophet is and does, that I am somehow limiting Christ? I am simply saying, lets define Bible offices biblically. I have met more self-proclaimed prophets and apostles that I care to mention. But their proclamation is not what is of primary importance to me. I am responsible to God, not to you or any other person who claims a title. My point is simply this: Prophets heard an audible message from God and Apostles walked with Jesus. Period. That is how the Bible defines these things. It also says they were the foundation of the church as listed above. Now you can disagree with my interpretation all you like. However, I would prefer if you don't turn this into a "You're attacking Jesus and limiting his ability" type of argument. Im trying to be faithful to what the Bible teaches. If you can show me biblically how I am wrong, I will gladly change my mind.

Yes, Paul proclaimed the whole will of God and I believe the NT captures the fullness of the message of the Gospel. Is your argument really that we don't have the full Gospel and God has commissioned you to fill in the gaps of where the Scriptures fall short? If so, I think you would fall well outside of what is viewed as an orthodox Christian. Joseph Smith had a similar notion when he formed the Latter Day Saints.

As far as the canon, I believe the Holy Spirit was at work in the Church throught he process of preserving the words we needed. It was never about Paul, it was always about God and His Spirit. Yes, I believe works not in the canon are not inspired. If they were inspired by the Spirit of God, they would have been placed there by the Spirit of God. That's kinda the idea of what the canon means. This is not to say non-canonical books cannot be accurate, but that they are not God-breathed. Im surprised you are taking this approach in the discussion.

As you know, Wormwood made the waters bitter so people might repent. However, they still refused to repent in spite God's attempt to wake them up. Sometimes God challenges us with things that are not comfortable to us and we have a choice as to whether or not we will respond to that which is uncomfortable or unpleasant or remain stiff-necked in spite of God's attempt to shake us up. This is always a reminder to me that sometimes we need to allow things that taste bitter and not what we expect as perhaps a means by which God is getting our attention. P.S. I am not saying that I am this agent, but that while Wormwood may look like a bad thing, its purpose was to turn people to God...which is a good thing.
 

michaelvpardo

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2011
4,204
1,734
113
67
East Stroudsburg, PA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Wormwood said:
This was the scripture I was referencing. My point is the foundation is laid. Nothing more than that. I am not limiting Christ. I am reflecting on what the Word of God teaches. Why is it that because I disagree with what a prophet is and does, that I am somehow limiting Christ? I am simply saying, lets define Bible offices biblically. I have met more self-proclaimed prophets and apostles that I care to mention. But their proclamation is not what is of primary importance to me. I am responsible to God, not to you or any other person who claims a title. My point is simply this: Prophets heard an audible message from God and Apostles walked with Jesus. Period. That is how the Bible defines these things. It also says they were the foundation of the church as listed above. Now you can disagree with my interpretation all you like. However, I would prefer if you don't turn this into a "You're attacking Jesus and limiting his ability" type of argument. Im trying to be faithful to what the Bible teaches. If you can show me biblically how I am wrong, I will gladly change my mind.
The bible doesn't define the offices you mention at all, or we wouldn't be having this argument. Interpreters and "theologians" have done that, and increasingly restrictively to consolidate their authority in opposition to Christ's. I've shown you repeatedly where you have been biblically "wrong." I've demonstrated that your handling of scripture is not always exegetical. I've demonstrated that you often choose to simply ignore what scripture plainly says, because it doesn't conform to your belief, and it may surprise you, but I have nothing to gain by changing your mind.
I will offer you some personal prophecy and I can say it without a doubt in my mind, because it's the common experience of sons and I've never made the leap to the conclusion that you are illegitimate, but you will certainly have what I refer to as a wood shed experience, very soon, and the only thing unique that I can offer to you in the way of this prophecy is that God is going to give you a choice, you're going to have to "pick the switch." Be thankful that you're not a king.
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well Michael,

I have tried to show you that there are definitions for these offices. It is how people (and God) determined what a prophet was, and conversely what constitutes false prophecy. Its how the Apostles determined who would take the place of Judas (Acts 1:21-22).

I have had many people who claim to be prophets make predictions over my life. One such prophet said I would have a son and then a daughter which was not true. Another said a friend of mine would soon come across great wealth. He has lived as a fairly impoverished minister for the past decade since the prediction. Of course these "prophets" generally like to make their predictions about people they do not know so they cannot be held accountable for their "predictions" at a later date. I find most such prophets resemble much more of something you'd see on a psychic hotline than anything from Scripture as they speak vaguely about coming blessing or trial in some unspecified time period. Or, they often use such self-declared offices as a means of placing themselves on a sort of pedestal over others and seek to speak as authoritarians over them. I see none of this type of behavior in the prophets of the Bible. They spoke specific words about specific events that often required specific actions on the part of the hearers.

My only desire is to serve the Lord and be faithful to his Word. Whether blessing or trial comes my way, I do not really care. I am the Lord's. He knows my heart and that is all that matters to me. I hope what you are saying is true. I would much rather be disciplined by God than have your words be false. I tremble at the thought of you standing before God giving an account of threats you made against one of his own in his name if not. I simply urge you and anyone else who may proclaim themselves to be a prophet to really think, study and pray over this matter. It is of utmost importance.
 

michaelvpardo

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2011
4,204
1,734
113
67
East Stroudsburg, PA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Wormwood said:
Well Michael,

I have tried to show you that there are definitions for these offices. It is how people (and God) determined what a prophet was, and conversely what constitutes false prophecy. Its how the Apostles determined who would take the place of Judas (Acts 1:21-22).

I have had many people who claim to be prophets make predictions over my life. One such prophet said I would have a son and then a daughter which was not true. Another said a friend of mine would soon come across great wealth. He has lived as a fairly impoverished minister for the past decade since the prediction. Of course these "prophets" generally like to make their predictions about people they do not know so they cannot be held accountable for their "predictions" at a later date. I find most such prophets resemble much more of something you'd see on a psychic hotline than anything from Scripture as they speak vaguely about coming blessing or trial in some unspecified time period. Or, they often use such self-declared offices as a means of placing themselves on a sort of pedestal over others and seek to speak as authoritarians over them. I see none of this type of behavior in the prophets of the Bible. They spoke specific words about specific events that often required specific actions on the part of the hearers.

My only desire is to serve the Lord and be faithful to his Word. Whether blessing or trial comes my way, I do not really care. I am the Lord's. He knows my heart and that is all that matters to me. I hope what you are saying is true. I would much rather be disciplined by God than have your words be false. I tremble at the thought of you standing before God giving an account of threats you made against one of his own in his name if not. I simply urge you and anyone else who may proclaim themselves to be a prophet to really think, study and pray over this matter. It is of utmost importance
I'm glad that you have a healthy attitude about trials. I'm not particularly worried about standing before God to account for my actions as His servant: I've already passed out of condemnation, back about 18 years ago. I've never really feared Hell as I saw myself as consigned to the flames for eternity prior to receiving the gospel (and back then my fear was of living forever), and now having received His gift, which is irrevocable, my only concern is to please Him and fulfill His call as best I can. I called Jesus my friend, long before I submitted to Him as my Lord and knew Him as my Savior, and everything that came my way, whether for good or evil, was always by His grace.
I've never threatened a brother in Christ, only warned them according to the power granted me as the confirmation of His calling and election, and that's what a prophet does.
You claim to belong to the Lord, so who were the following verses for:
6. Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, let us use them: if prophecy, let us prophesy in proportion to our faith; 7. or ministry, let us use it in our ministering; he who teaches, in teaching; 8. he who exhorts, in exhortation; he who gives, with liberality; he who leads, with diligence; he who shows mercy, with cheerfulness. Romans 12:6-8
Will you instruct the Lord?

Very few of the prophets, from the days before His appearing or afterward, ever wrote any scripture; Some had scribes which recorded what was said by the prophet, but few ever lifted a pen themselves, and typically those that wrote were commanded to do so, or simply wrote from a heart of love, songs of praise, adoration, and worship to the only One genuinely worthy of it.
The Lord gave me the pen of a ready writer from my youth and I once thought to make a living by it, but even before receiving the Lord, I wasn't quite willing to sell out my skills to pander to prurient interests (as was suggested by one interested publisher.) If you'd ever seen any of my early art work, you'd know that I had no such qualms about my subject matter, but my words were always of a higher priority because of the nature that God gave to them, and for me the scripture has always born down upon them with the weight of conscience. Don't think that my years of military service and the pollution of my speech through them and through decades of working among men of rough speech hasn't weighed heavily on my soul, but still I remain without condemnation because of the price which He paid for me, and that I could never have paid on my own.
The Lord put my skills to use almost immediately after I understood the free gift of His sacrifice on my behalf. I've seen Him bless it, but even if my works fail the test and are proven of little or no value, still I trust Him and still I know Him, and He has promised that I will not be disappointed in spite of all the disappointment of this life (this I heard from Him as surely as I can be sure of anything.)
Some others on this forum use the term watchmen when referring to the office of prophet and in this they are entirely correct (in defining the term biblically and exegetically.) Watchmen are the eyes and ears searching for signs of judgment. Watchmen are those who call out the warning. Watchmen are those who stand in the gap when the city is under attack. You should pray for understanding; it isn't of the utmost importance if you've believed the gospel, but wisdom demands it.
Why are prophets still needed? Not for new revelation, as that is complete in the person revealed through scripture. But until we reach perfection in His presence, we still sin, and our sin will always blind us.
What is His counsel?
"I counsel you to buy from Me gold refined in the fire, that you may be rich; and white garments, that you may be clothed, that the shame of your nakedness may not be revealed; and anoint your eyes with eye salve, that you may see. "As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten. Therefore be zealous and repent. Revelation 3:18-19
Your trial, that which you appear to already be in, has the purpose of revealing what you really value. This may only be evident to yourself, but it certainly will become clearer, one way or another. If you genuinely believe that "you are the Lords," then why do you strive against His word?
I urge you to really "think, study and pray" over this matter. It was men who claimed to belong to the Lord that had many of the saints burnt to death, hung, drawn and quartered, tortured mercilessly, and these we can only judge by their works.
If you've made the good confession and received Him by faith, our Lord will reveal the matter to you.
You should try to understand one simple fact, before there was scripture, the Word already was. After every book has been burnt to ashes, the Word will still remain. You don't carry the Word about in your hands when you go to a church service or a bible study, you carry Him in your heart (that is if you've actually received Him). If the former were true, then Christ would be found in the synagogue each Saturday. Even the accursed free masons have a bible in every temple, from which much of their luciferian doctrine is derived.
The bible is an introduction to Christ, a love letter from the Father, a standard by which we may judge another's words and deeds, but the Word is far greater than that which is committed to writing, and His Spirit is the One which gives life to the written word in our hearts. He is established in heaven. He endures forever. We don't worship a book, we worship our Lord and Creator. I have lots of copies of the bible in various translations and I love reading them, but if they were all taken from me, yet I would still have the Word. He lives and reigns forever and having made a place for Himself within my heart, could I reject Him and why in all of creation would I ever desire to do so?
If your genuine desire is to be faithful to His word, then you should probably start by believing it.
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Thanks for your response.


So let me get this straight...

You think I should ignore my very extensive and in-depth searching of God's Word on this subject, my inner convictions as well as my extensive experience with self-claimed prophets because....you say you are a prophet and you say so?

And if I don't, I am like those who murdered the saints and not much different from heretics who have the Bible but believe anti-Christian doctrines? Is that what you are saying? I just want to be clear here.
 

michaelvpardo

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2011
4,204
1,734
113
67
East Stroudsburg, PA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Wormwood said:
Thanks for your response.


So let me get this straight...

You think I should ignore my very extensive and in-depth searching of God's Word on this subject, my inner convictions as well as my extensive experience with self-claimed prophets because....you say you are a prophet and you say so?

And if I don't, I am like those who murdered the saints and not much different from heretics who have the Bible but believe anti-Christian doctrines? Is that what you are saying? I just want to be clear here.
No, not at all, I'm just saying that you're not much of a scholar; a true scholar doesn't build a case from select pieces of data and ignore all the material that opposes his view.
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What am I ignoring? Please point to a text. I have no issue with the Romans text you pointed out. Yes, God made some prophets and they prophesied according to their faith. How does this text prove my biblical definition of a prophet to be incorrect?
 

michaelvpardo

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2011
4,204
1,734
113
67
East Stroudsburg, PA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Wormwood said:
What am I ignoring? Please point to a text. I have no issue with the Romans text you pointed out. Yes, God made some prophets and they prophesied according to their faith. How does this text prove my biblical definition of a prophet to be incorrect?
I haven't seen you present any biblical definition of a prophet yet, only some assertions based upon a few scriptures. If you present something representing a cogent argument, I'll be happy to present the related passages in their context to give a fuller explanation. The fact of the matter is that you haven't contributed to the topic, only opposed it.
Using Paul's analogy of the church universal being the body of Christ (not the RC church or some other denomination) how would you define the eyes and ears? How exactly would you answer the question posed as the topic and in this, present something useful to build the body rather than beat it down and defraud those whom God has gifted and chosen to serve? Please, inform us, illuminate us with your wisdom. Give us a word of encouragement and some balm for our wounds. Or is that you believe that all that is necessary for the church is a foundation; walls are optional, a floor, a roof or even a capstone, just dead weight?
You claim to hold the scripture in some esteem, are the words just there for your study or understanding, or do they have application? Are they dead or are they living? Is the application just to you or to me, or does the word of God bear weight with the church, or with nations, or with the stars of heaven and all that is created? Illuminate us, bring to bear those years of rigorous study and the mind which God has supplied you with, and give us an answer or maybe even a possible solution to a church that staggers about blindly desiring to hear from God, but being told that God doesn't speak to anyone anymore, having ears but not hearing and eyes but not seeing, and being buffeted by those who offer accusation but no relief or empty promises with no fulfillment.

I'm anticipating more generalized hyperbole or rambling accusation (you've seen my example here as well), but surprise me with a little directness and honor Christ in the process. That is how men are intended to communicate; it's called honesty.



"Again, the kingdom of heaven is like a dragnet that was cast into the sea and gathered some of every kind, "which, when it was full, they drew to shore; and they sat down and gathered the good into vessels, but threw the bad away. "So it will be at the end of the age. The angels will come forth, separate the wicked from among the just, "and cast them into the furnace of fire. There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth.'' Jesus said to them, "Have you understood all these things?''
They said to Him, "Yes, Lord.''
Then He said to them, "Therefore every scribe instructed concerning the kingdom of heaven is like a householder who brings out of his treasure things new and old.'' Matthew 13:47-52
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Michael,

What I have intended to show you, (apparently insufficiently for you anyways) is that someone is declared a "prophet" by God under very specific circumstances. People did not denote themselves to be prophets in Scripture on a feeling, nor was the title given to them because someone else thought it was fitting. I have tried to show you that everytime we see a prophet "called" in the Bible it is the result of a voice or vision from God giving specific instructions and usually a specific message for a specific people. I think the burden of proof is on you that you can have a friend denote you to be a prophet and say "its gonna be a hard life for you." That somehow this is how prophets are designated by God. I have also tried to show that God defined the difference between one of his prophets and a prophet that was speaking falsely as one who was given a specific message directly from God vs. one who prophesied out of their "imagination."

Yes, there are prophets in the Bible that just kinda "burst" onto the scene and we don't really get insight into how they were called. Yet, I personally think we should speak where Scripture speaks and remain silent where it is silent. We should not point to the gaps in the Biblical record as evidence that the prophet was called the same way you believe you were called, which is different from anything the Bible actually records. That is basing your view in nothing in my opinion.

As far as the "eyes and ears" and "floor, walls and roof" analogies you are looking for, I am afraid I cannot go there. What I base my teaching on is what is contained in the biblical record...not based on my feelings or assumptions. If the Bible doesn't give specific reference to a particular gift being the "eyes" of the body of Christ or the "ears" then I do not know that I can insert that on my own authority. I don't expect anyone to believe something simply because I say it is so. I am not God, nor do I pretend to be God or his vessel to provide unique revelation outside what His Spirit has inspired. I try to base my ideas on what the Bible says, not what I say. Obviously I understand my interpretation can be wrong. I do not pretend to be infallible in my interpretation. However, I do focus on interpretation of Scripture rather than claiming authority on things not taught in the Bible.

So...

The Scripture says the Apostles and prophets were the foundation of the church. I think we do not need to go beyond that. We both know a foundation is laid once and is not continually laid while the church is being built. I think this verse is very insightful as to how God has chosen to build his church and the nature of the roles of the Apostles and prophets. Walls, bedrooms, ceilings and so forth are not mentioned because it has nothing to do with the point the Scripture is making. To insert it or make applications from this idea is to go beyond what the Bible teaches and I am not willing to do that.

Scripture does not give a one-to-one correlation between particular gifts and parts of the body of Christ. It simply says "the eye cannot say to the hand, "I don't need you." and so forth. It does not say, "and the eye is the prophet, and the hand is the teacher and the modest parts of the body are those gifted with tongues" and so forth. You are making the assumption that the prophet is the eye of Christ's body, which I do not think is justified. Jesus Christ is the "head" of the church so if we want to slice hairs here, we should say that Jesus is the eyes, ears, nose and mouth of the church and we make up the neck down. However, I think these analogies have much more to do with how we are to work together from the guidance of Christ and are not trying to designate body parts for each gift. In fact, I think to do so undermines Paul's point that we should not boast in one gift over another as if some parts of the body are more significant than others.

Of course my ideas have application. Now maybe they are not the application you are looking for that tries to tell someone something specific they need to do or be based on a title I have bestowed upon myself, but I do serve the Church. I believe gifts are about investing in others and pouring oneself out for the sake of another's faith rather than trying to be the voice of God for someone else or an authoritarian. All believers have the Spirit and the full revelation of God through his Word. Moreover, we have teachers, evangelists, those gifted with mercy, service, giving, and many other gifts for the sake of serving each other and encouraging others in the faith. The "faith" is about confidence in Jesus Christ and our standing as sons and daughters of Almighty God based on the work of Christ. I have given my life to building people up in the faith of the cross of Christ, and will continue to do so, Lord willing. If you were a prophet, you would know this to be true and wouldn't be asserting that my life, teaching and service to Christ is void of life, substance or honesty. It saddens me to see you taking this course in your conversation. I disagree with your ideas, but I have tried to be particularly cautious about saying your love for Christ is not genuine or your ministry is fraudulent. We are all in error in some ways, yet the Lord is gracious and allows us to serve Him in spite of our imperfections. If you view my disagreement with you on the role of a prophet as an attack on your spirituality or ability to serve God, then you have misread me. It has never been my intent to attack you or claim your faith or love for Christ is anything but genuine. I simply think you are in error about your understanding of what a prophet is and how they function in the body of Christ. I would appreciate it if you would allow me the same dignity of being a genuine Christ follower that you just happen to believe is in error in how I understand the role of prophets in the body of Christ. There is no need to turn this into an attack on character or spirituality. I do not think Christ would want that for either of us.
 

michaelvpardo

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2011
4,204
1,734
113
67
East Stroudsburg, PA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Wormwood said:
I would appreciate it if you would allow me the same dignity of being a genuine Christ follower that you just happen to believe is in error in how I understand the role of prophets in the body of Christ. There is no need to turn this into an attack on character or spirituality. I do not think Christ would want that for either of us.
Well, we may be in agreement about something: I believe that we're all entitled to our understanding, which translates into the notion that you have as much right to be wrong as I do. However, I don't believe that gives you the right to determine how another demonstrates his faith.
For the record, I wasn't called to be a prophet by a man or by my imagination or any such thing. I was called by God, I was trained by God, and I was sent by God.
I would hope that you have the same understanding of your own calling, though it clearly has nothing to do with prophecy. Everyone born again of the Spirit of God receives gifts from Him for the purpose of ministry, but since these are spiritual gifts they have to be spiritually discerned. Children aren't born with discernment, but have to learn it. The same is true of those born of His Spirit, and the greater part of learning discernment comes through learning the scripture.
When I said that it was others (not just one) that identified some of the gifts that I was blessed with, this was true because no one takes honor to himself in the service of God. Even the Lord came with a witness other than His own for the satisfaction of the law. There may be people who covet the gift of prophecy, but that's only because they don't understand it; Prophecy is a burden to the one who receives the calling (you'll find some explanation of that statement in the calling of Ezekiel, but since you're a long time student of scripture you should know this as well.) The reward is not the office, but in bearing the burden with faithfulness. As far as having a burden of proof of my calling, no prophet ever bore such a burden himself, because the burden is carried by God who confirms the word of His prophets. You'll note that the world promotes the ambitious, but God promotes the humble (and He knows how to humble us when it's necessary.)