CharismaticLady
Well-Known Member
Great observations @CharismaticLady
This is a problem with Penal Substitution Theory. It does not believe that the “charges were dropped” or that “we are acquitted”. It holds that God is a slave to a humanistic sense of retributive justice and therefore must punish someone for a sin before that sin can be forgiven; so God punishes the Righteous, makes the Righteous a child of wrath, in order to forgive the unrighteous.
It is a horrible philosophy, but when it was articulated and applied to the Atonement during the Reformation period it resonated with the judicial philosophy of the day.
Personally, I do believe that Jesus took our punishment for the sins of the whole world; that doesn't bother me. What I do not agree with is that Jesus took the punishment for us individually for the "future" sins we commit too as in the saying "past, present and future" sins. No where is that taught in Scripture. Scripture is clear that individually, our PAST sins are cleansed. 2 Peter 1:9. What is not understood is that Jesus doesn't just leave us on our own then to sin again. No, He gives us His Spirit to make us born again with a new nature that does not desire to sin and is no longer trapped in the struggle of Romans 7. 2 Peter 1:2-4
Romans 8:1-9, Romans 6, 1 John 3, 2 Peter 1
Last edited: