Search results

It seems that people may have been tricked into looking at this scripture backward. In other words, as the original poster says, to be 'taken' is to be destroyed and to be 'left behind' is to be left in peace. Modern theologists have reversed the meaning. There was an old Twilight Zone show...

If you read the verses carefully, you see that it says "And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom", not after the days of them. The kingdom that is set up is the one formed during Tribulation and it is instramental in the destruction of these kings, not something...

I also agree with this statement, but I will take it one step further. Allow me to paste a snippit from the "Simple Timeline Chart": "It must be noted that only those who have endured the Tribulation, and possibly died during it, will be a part of this First Resurrection as per Revelation...

Well, without seeing it, I guess I can't offer an opinion on that, now can I? Personally, I think this one is pretty good, but anything is open to improvement. Were you able to see how all the days add up perfectly in your chart or do you use some biblically unsupported method? Perhaps an...

Well, after my first stumble, I am at least glad to see that some took the time to check it out. As you can see, there are no flaws that I can find in it this chart. It is simple and straightforward. All you need to understand is that the Seven Angels are representative of real people who will...

Here it is. I cant believe what a problem it was trying to get this info up. It was almost like something was fighting me. Ahh, probably not, just me being lame right? :)

see attached Sorry guys, it wont let me show you and I cant seem to cut and paste it either. Oh well.

No, I gotta stick with what I have already said. Daniel identified Michael in the 12th chapter and I am sure he was speaking of him in the 9th chapter as well. I have outlined some pretty good reasons to think so too, which no one can find a flaw with. Next you will be telling me that Cyrus is...

Kaoticprophet, I was saying that Daniel, Darius and Belshazzar DID exist and that the release of the Jews occured in 536-535. How you came to the conclusion that I said the opposite is rather, well, kaotic. I am not sure how someone could read what I said and not understand that. By the way...

Unfortunately, that is just a misguided opinion. Most people at least understand that the time spoken of in Daniel 9 has to do with the Apocalypse, which is yet to come. People who think this event has already happened never cease to amaze me. This interpretation is probably worse than those...

If I might be so bold, I would like to interject a thought. Have you ever considered that those who end up in hell forever might be there because thats the way they want it? God may be just fulfilling their desire as He fulfulls the desires of all creatures. What is a living miserable hell to...

Each of the Seven Angels of Revelation is one of the Kings being referred to in these passages, because they are all going to be born on earth as men. The Eighth king is the False Prophet. All of this is future prophecy and has nothing to do with the past at all.

Michael is an Angel but he will be made into a man, just as Jesus was and risk the life God gives him in the fight against the Beast. This is the crux of what I am trying to show you. I have started another thread about the difference between Michael and Jesus and will try to explain it more...

In the prophicy of Dan 7, the actions of the Ancient of Days show this person coming at the end of the Apocalypse and throwing the Beast in the Fire. If you look at the two scriptures that I have provided, you will find that the Ancient of Days and Jesus are an exact match. Once you see this...

The eight kings of Revelation are the Seven Angels of Revelation and the False Prophet that rises after that supports the Seventh King, who is the Beast.

The key to understanding the prophisies concerning the Apocalypse, both in the Old and New Testament is the understanding that Jesus and Michael are two different people as per Zech 11. The first staff of Beauty being Jesus, as identified by Matthew in Matt 27:9, and the staff of Bands being...

I think the last part of your sentance makes it all clear. Dont ask if you dont want to know. After all, anyone who wants to understand why I think as I do can click on my name and see my posts which explain my thinking in detail But I learned a long time ago that although you can lead a horse...

Well thank you Dragonfly. I try to keep it right, even if it seems to disagree with the majority. As for Jesus being the Branch, I never saw seven women taking hold of him and calling themselves by his name anywhere in the Bible. It seems it would have been mentioned as a fullfillment of this...

Anyone who believes that the 70 weeks are not what God said they were, that is to say exactly 70 weeks, is incorrect. The day for year theory is not true.

Seems pretty straight forward. I think you guys are totally wrong on how you look at this and I am trying to show you whats right.