Search results

The entire sequence in the order it will occur: 1. Seven weeks (49 days), the first part of the 70 weeks. (Dan 9:25) 2. The First Woe, 5 months (150 days) (Rev 9:5) 3. 62 weeks (434 days), the second part or middle of the 70 weeks. (Dan 9:25) 4. The Second Woe, An Hour, day, month and year...

I took a look at that article and it does not deal properly with Isa 4. He makes a statement that it is about dealing with the haughty women of Jerusalem but fails to mention that the very next verse shows God approving of it. Now, once again, I will say that this seems to be a one time...

Sorry, Daniel calls Michael "the Great Prince" in Dan 12: Dan 9:25 Know 3045 therefore and understand 7919, [that] from the going forth 4161 of the commandment 1697 to restore 7725 and to build 1129 Jerusalem 3389 unto the Messiah 4899 the Prince 5057 [shall be] seven 7651 weeks...

I think you misunderstood me. I am saying that Belshazzer and Darius DID exist which is what you are having to disagree with if you say that the Jews were let go in 538. You are saying that Darius did not exist, not me. I am saying that Darius DID exist and that it was during 538 that the...

Well darn it Jerzy, I gotta say that I just cant buy (from a biblical standpoint, based on all the things I have shown you, which seem clear) that Satan is always a formless thought. You might oughta rethink that. :) Whether he is an Angel or something else, I'm not sure. I have pondered if he...

I have to disagree with that "Cyrus let the Jews go in 538" stuff. While it is all a bit hard to prove, it was most likely that this event occured in 535 which would put this whole thing right on schedule. Now it is widely circulated that there was no such person as Darius the Mede, who Daniel...

Ok, so just to be clear, do you think that Satan is in any way an individual personality or just simply a thought process, or perhaps both?

So Jerzy, who is Satan? Please do me a favor and try to answer plainly and not with another question. I may simply be misunderstanding something here.

Jerzy, I feel I am beating a dead horse here, but, just on the off chance you didnt catch what I showed you, Ill sum it up. In Job, it clearly states a conversation by two beings, one identified as God and the other one as Satan. In Matthew, it clearly states a conversation by two beings, one...

Hello Trekson. I know that few pay attention to the relationship of the 70 years of Jeremiah and the 70 weeks of Daniel. This is both a shame and an example of an event being done physically yet relating symbolically to another event, which then can be looked on as prophecy. There is a direct...

Trekson, what you are describing is Occam's Razor. It is a principle urging one to select from among competing hypotheses that which makes the fewest assumptions. In simple terms it means: The simplest explanation is usually the right one. Many interpreters of the Bible have left this...

Guys, Jerzy is just here to get you going. He makes no points and only questions everything while ignoring answers. Hmm, isnt that a good definition of what Satan is supposed to do?

I think that the main reason most people cant accept what I am saying here is simply because they misunderstand that Jesus and Michael are two different people and that the Anointed One (Messiah it is interpreted here, tho it is interpreted Anointed One in the other 30+ places this word is used)...

I cant believe I am even going to reply to this thread but I thought I would throw in some verses. Before I do tho, I should point out to Jerzy that any "proof' he shows here is simply some stuff from the Catholics. I think that should speak for itself. I mean, I like Catholics, but anyone who...

Heh, I thought that quote from Oscar Wild was hilarious. But getting back to being serious, and with the fear of hijacking this thread, I can provide many verses, with possibly one of the main ones being in Revelation 12 where it shows Michael and his followers, called his Angels, risking death...

So, if I am right and Michael comes first and fights the Beast on earth during the Apocalypse, and it turns out that he fulfills this prophecy, and the Beast, who will be doing his best to act like a good guy accuses him of evil in this matter, how will you act? Also I found this: Bigamy is...

So, just one question. If it turns out that I am right, would you guys condemn this fellow if he shows up in person as the Bible seems to present it?

Thanks for at least commenting Brother James. I have to reiterate tho that this seems to me to be an actual event. Not only that but it seems that this action pleases God. Lastly, it appears that it is directed toward a certain person known as the Branch. This particular fellow is presented in...

Well, I guess thats the answer. If you cant explain a passage in the bible, you ignore it. (Isa 4, the whole chapter)

Well, since I see no responce to my post, I must assume that no one has a decent explaination for Isa 4.