Search results

they disprove that God considers Israel and the Christian Church as two seperate entities... it's where the lower part of my sig comes from... in Christ's eyes, there are no differences.and I did... I did study it. I studied without using dispensationalism, or any other form of theology... and...

then prove me wrong without Bullinger's commentary. Prove that Ultradispensationalism is God's truth, because in all honesty, Romans 11, Galatians 3, and Ephesians 2 completely disprove it.I'm happy that you're not apologizing... but that's not what I'm suggesting. Anyone can claim that the...

I'm not telling you how to pray to God, Christina... I'm simply encouraging you to not rely on the interpretation of man and rely on the Holy Spirit for guidance.really? it bothers me?... okay... sure... next time I'm thinking about something, I'll just come to you since you supposedly know what...

that doesn't change anything... in fact, that harmonizes with covenant theology, and not hyper-dispensationalismin all honesty, it was hyper-dispensationalism that confused the crap out of me when I started reading the Bible... in fact, to be completely truthful to you and Christina, when I...

I studied alone before I came here as well, jordan...and honestly, you've done it in the past as well, so don't get a high and mighty attitude with me.I'm simply stating the obvious here... The Bible speaks of a unity in Christ, whether they be Jew or Gentile... dispensationalism says that there...

and yet you still use Bullinger's notes to guide you... a pre-trib rapturists believe that they have been led by the Holy Spirit to believe in a pre-trib rapture, and yet they still follow the notes of Lacunza, Darby, and Scofield... Christina, Jordan, ask yourselves these questions:"Am I...

christina, I could say the exact same thing... there are many people out there who have studied the Bible just as much as Bullinger did and came up with a different interpretation...so tell me something; what makes Bullinger so different than everyone else? did God give him some special kind of...

then why don't you stop listening to E.W. Bullinger, because he was also just a man

i agree, but the way you wrote it, you made it sound like they were contradicting each other

(precepts;62595) Christina's The papacy as "the Mother of Harlots" has already decieved the world by claiming to have an image of the living God! What about the so-called prayer shawl. The powers that be promotes these Anti-christ images and idealogy. The papacy is looked upon as the institution...

no, James is re-iterating the fact that faith does save someone, but that faith is meaningless if it doesn't change you from the inside... a professed Christian is going to call himself/herself a Christian and still live in sin and be a part of the world... a true Christian will have changed...

(Jordan;62597) More junk from men! just because Bullinger said so?wasn't E.W. Bulligner just a man as well?

no, it's not... James is actually strengthening what Paul said. The only way we come to the conclusion that it is through woks that we are saved is by taking what James said out of context.Those works prove that we have been saved by Christ because of the Holy Spirit working within us to change...

no."For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."

you're absolutely right, lastsecman... works cannot get anyone into heaven... it is the saving faith and grace of God that we recieve eternal salvation...however, just because we receive through grace and faith, does not mean we can go back to the lifestyle we once lived... we can profess to be...

(tomwebster;62169) ff, little off topic but I think you said somewhere that you were a Pastor, I was wondering if you were able to read any Hebrew or Greek? Just curious is all, I enjoy being able to at least check out the original languages as I study Scripture. I do the same thing... it helps...

on the issue on what stone said in the opening post ...that the Textus Receptus was God's preserved word in the original New Testament language. i personally believe that this is a load of hogwash. God will use a rock to spread His Word if necessary, and besides the NWT, all translations still...

(ffbruce;62163) The former.The reason I didn't respond to the second half is because it has nothing to do with the conversation at hand. actually, yes it does, ffbruce... if you actually sat down and read it.to say the KJV is the only text where it shows the Word of God is a joke at best.

(ffbruce;62156) And what does all this have to do with the KJV?You DO know, don't you, that the Textus Receptus was the work of one man - a Catholic priest by the name of Erasmus? So if you're going to bash the Roman Catholic Church, you're undermining your entire argument FOR the KJVO point of...

and all were made by a power hungry church who only read it in Latin to make it's own leader seem holier than everyone else...and if you REALLY want to get down to the basics, you can thank John Wycliffe who made the very first New Testament free from Catholic repression in 1384.