Search results

I don't know if he's here right now but @Hidden In Him interprets dreams.

This is speaking about an utter rejection of Christ after having been enlightened by the Holy Spirit. It's not talking about generalized sinfulness.

Disagree. Jesus never said "if you sin again your sins wont be forgiven" Thanks for your post

Ty sir

What light questions do you have for God? For me, I'd ask how many people will be saved and why that number specifically? Or, what is the purpose of our dreams when we went to sleep on earth? Casual thread. Blessings to you all in Christ.

But they have been forgiven. If you don't believe they have, then are you even believing the gospel?

As much as I agree with this statement, it comes off as you being a proponent of sinless perfectionism. I already mentioned why this is impossible.

So I've been encountering this position a lot lately, that Christ's once-for-all sacrifice at Calvary only covers the past sins of Christians. Such a position is held by a number of believers in Christ who seem to think that Christ's eternal sacrifice is in some way, shape or form, insufficient...

I don't see how it could be Nero. Nero never implemented a mark of the beast system.

I don't see how it could be Nero. Nero never implemented a mark of the beast system.

No, they really haven't. They haven't even come on the scene yet.

It says that they ascend from the pit, not that they were kicked out of heaven

Nowhere in Revelation does it state that the locust creatures released from the pit are fallen Angels.

The entire 7 year shebang is Jacob's Trouble

Do you realize that most pretribers believe in a literal, physical mark?

I think it says that only those who take the mark will be tormented like that. Not those without the mark

That's one of the reasons for pretrib. Christians go up, then during the Tribulation others come to faith, then we come down and Jesus judges the nations.

Then where do we descend from? We go up to heaven for a split second then come immediately back down? Doesn't make sense

If the blood of Christ doesn't cleanse future sins then is that because it is ineffective and in inefficacious? That's essentially what your saying. That the sacrifice of Christ, being infinite and existing outside of time, is insufficient to cover our sins.

Yes. In the past many Christians were put to death for their faith. So what? That verse doesn't talk about the future. The dead rise first. Then those who are alive and remain are then caught up. It happens immediately after the dead in Christ rise.