Search results

The OP claims it has it has Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture. Let's see if that might be so by looking at some of this per the following angle. And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them(Revelation 20:4) Let's start with...

Total nonsense and here is why. Apply escaping the 2nd death for all of eternity then tell us a bodily resurrection is not required to do that. You are reasoning these things in vaccuum here. You are not even factoring in that no one, including the saved that has already died, can escape the 2nd...

John 12:48 He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day. What I have underlined what do you take that to be involving? As to what the text plainly says, only one of the following options can...

Let's do some comparing then, right? Acts 26:23 That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles. Revelation 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them...

The first resurrection is? A) the bodily raising of saints B) being born again Obviouly, it can't be both. Amils have already decided it is meaning B). Premils have already decided it is meaning A). What have you decided it is meaning? Before you try and answer that, obviously one has to be...

But we are talking about the beast here not satan. Premils do not agree satan is currently in the pit but do agree the beast is in the pit until it is released. Then once it is released it fulfills it's 42 month reign. You don't perhaps think satan and the beast are one and the same, do you...

Apparently, you would have us believe that within a same literal 60 minutes, Christ is first going to raise the saved, billions of them, judge and reward each and everyone, one at a time, BTW, then within that same literal 60 minutes Christ is then going to raise all of the lost, billions of...

I don't see that being problematic for Premil, and one reason why is the following. Plus you already provided the solution when you said this--They are changed in a moment and caught up to be with Jesus in the air. 1 Corinthians 15:51 ehold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we...

Can you not understand that Amil has the beast in the pit the entire thousand years? As if it makes sense that while it is in the pit this is when one can be martyred for their faith by refusing to worship it. Here's an idea. Revelation 9:2 And he opened the bottomless pit; and there arose a...

You go first. First explain how there can be 2 sets of last days, one before Christ was born, the other after He was born. Meaning the last days recorded in both Isaiah 2 and Ezekiel 38. BTW, when was the last day of the last days pertaining to Ezekiel 38? When did that occur? You argue that...

I have noticed that myself. And IMO, what you have in red are meaning the martyrs under the altar during the 5th seal, and the ones you have in blue are meaning their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, after the beast ascends out of the pit. IOW...

Not if we apply 2 Peter 3:8 to the last day. If Christ returns within 2000 years, that would be involving 2 days based on 2 Peter 3:8. And if when He returns it is then the last day of the last days. and that the last day is involving the millennium, I don't see the issue when there is 2 Peter...

With that in mind as an argument, what about the following? Isaiah 30:17 One thousand shall flee at the rebuke of one; at the rebuke of five shall ye flee: till ye be left as a beacon upon the top of a mountain, and as an ensign on an hill. Using your logic that must mean this one thousand is...

It doesn't matter whether you think I understand Amil or not. This is not about that so much, this is about comparing the two accounts and then deciding whether or not Amils are correct to conclude what they do, or if they are incorrect to do so. It's called testing their theory Revelation...

Per Revelation 19 though, you do agree they are up in the sky first per that account, right? Obviously, the rapture precedes Christ and His army confronting the beast and it's armies. Not meaning a Pretrib rapture, though. Meaning a post trib rapture, that that rapture occurs first, thus no...

The first resurrection only involves a bodily resurrection. Not one single time does it involve a resurrection that is not bodily, including Revelation 20:4-6. How can we know for certain? Let's start with the following facts. John only mentions 2 resurrection events in Revelation 20. 1) the...

Why would the 2nd death be relevant in the here and now? The 2nd death involves the LOF and eternal death, regardless how one might interpret eternal death. We can't apply the LOF to the here and now. Therefore, when it has no power over someone and why it has no power over them is because they...

As to B), though. The context pertains to someone literally dead at the time. And the fact everyone dies, regardless, that means when Jesus said anyone that believes in Him shall never die, He wasn't applying the never die part to the here and now. The believing in Him obviously applies to the...

IMO, the first resurrection is a type of resurrection. It is a resurrection only involving the saved righteous. The 2nd resurrection is also a type of resurrection. It is a resurrection only involving the unsaved lost. The first resurrection began with Christ's resurrection. Even if there were...

Allow me to at least explain then what I meant by all of that. And what did I mean by that in context? I meant if we were all Amils it would mean John neglected to mention the most important resurrection event in Revelation 20, the bodily resurrection of saints. Because none of us would believe...